Friday, December 11, 2009

Great Find Dood: F--k Suzuki With A Zucchini


WEARECHANGE Ottawa Confronts Suzuki and Trudeau about the Man Made Global Warming Hoax


FYI, about a year ago when I was having winter meetings at my place to plan for truthing season, I started piggybacking a mass email blast to reach the leaders of truth movements across Canada. The goal was to see if people reacted to options they received by doing stuff; or suggesting more options; or if they didn't bother doing anything. I mentioned at the time that if we didn't act on our beliefs on behalf of others, that I was going to be a whistleblower on behalf of all Canadians to let them know what the problem is. Consider this a head's up. With previous anecdotes and a year's worth of hard-evidence, some of my analysis is below.

In 2010, I'm planning on destroying the Canadian "conspiracy theorist" movement. Most truthers don't feel like doing anything, and even most truther leaders and celebrities aren't pushing much for us to take action. People want something like a "pat on the back" for doing nothing, but the cowardice, apathy, eugenics and Orwellian double-think of people who focus on feeling better by cussing out the general public who don't know better -- because we don't tell them -- is ridiculous. Canadians with knowledge of what's happening have an obligation to do something about it before we're all dead. Our conspiracy culture isn't doing that.

So: it must be destroyed before Canada is.

Then: people who can view our problems practically must be found.

And: work on figuring out what to do about them instead of just figuring out what they are.



Thanks dood. No response yet. I haven't written it. I did run the idea by Mark 6x though. The fact that he let me tells me it's probably a good idea. Plus I ran it by other truthers. This is something we can all sit at home and email out in the cold weather. With all this stuff happening there's no off-season, even in cold Canada, just new things to think of doing while we have time.

Essentially, I want to create a 500 - 1000 word .pdf document titled "Climategate vs. Copenhagen: What's In It For Canadians?" (e.g.) explaining there are 282 TTS Members, 800 CAP Members, 100+ other Cdn. Truth Members, 1000+ who signed the Climategate petition, plus others across Canada who believe the information here is worth checking out. That's enough reason to.

It'll be footnoted with links, but otherwise a smooth read. I'll start with Climategate vs. Copenhagen, then move towards some simple health and wealth info, then invite them to contact us if they'd like. It's going to take some time and concentration to write it perfectly, I just have to find it. We can either make this a TTS effort, or have it co-signed by other groups across Canada.

We don't realize that -- with hundreds publicly and thousands privately agreeing -- we could be forming effective lobby groups to approach other Canadians or Canadian groups and suggest they check stuff out. That's all we have to do. If we decide to be loners who have isolated random conversations, then that's what we'll be. If we can work together, we show we're doing better than most.

Anyway, I'll get it done by Monday, I'm 2 years behind and stuff takes time.

Regardless, if I have to do this by myself, it'll get messy before we win.

However, if we try to work together soon, we can win fairly easily.



Great Find Dood. F--k Suzuki With A Zucchini.


great find dood. f--k suzuki with a zucchini. we've gotta have the "who's funding them?" arguments ready to stop the commie greeniac legions, otherwise they won't "know" sh-t and just "believe" whatever they want. the foundation-role in 100 years of conspirashit isn't discussed much because most conspiracy theorists are distracted and mind-controlled into ignoring it. they're the real source of social engineering and why we have to compete against tons of fake charities sucking up the energy of good people.

once more of us start using logic to "follow the money" to "find the crime" we'll be fine. the alien crap and most other stuff is so masturbatory that it leads to most conspiracy theorists just j-rking off over what they find for themselves. that's why the global government we've feared for years is finally here -- and -- many of us can't react in any way. we're so used to "fighting the new world order" by just "learning random crap for ourselves" that we now can't help ourselves or anyone else. canadians have to know this.

nobody has to do everything, but everybody has to do something. if they can't, they aren't worth anything to themselves or anyone else. just like the general public, once conspiracy theorists see how they've been brainwashed into being useless against the new world order -- no matter how much they learn -- they can finally "wake up" and realize it. just like the general public, many conspira-sheeple won't be able to realize it. the rest have to push through all the conspira-cobwebs and figure out practical things to do.

with almost no "production" from most conspiracy theorists, the value of their knowledge or analysis is never really tested. people can argue about random crap they find, but since the goal is to wake up more people and beat the new world order before they beat us, just surfing different websites and agreeing to disagree leaves "truthers" nowhere near "truth" at all. the "truth" is our research is only as valuable as what we can achieve with it. the fact that most "truthers" don't want to achieve anything is making us useless.

there's lots of evidence of this online and offline. if the people who try to figure out "conspiracy theories" can't or won't apply their knowledge in any way, or just settle for the least they could do, then we have to figure out what happened to us, how to fix it and how to make sure the next people we wake up don't fall into the same trap. from there, we have to do what ALL self-help books suggest: have a goal, have a plan, think positive. without goals or plans to validate our positive thinking, we can clearly see the problem.

we're also sold the "hope" vs. "information" dilemma. we can see "religion" and/or "god" is now mostly used as an "insurance policy" by willfully lazy people, including conspiracy theorists. in the old days people used to "act" on religious principles to improve their society. now, they just ignore the fact that "god" helps those who help themselves. or, instead of just vaccinating your child and hoping "god" makes sure everything is alright, perhaps you can look into the issue more and have "god" help you figure it out.

conspiracy theorists are trapped in the same paradigm of "hope" without doing much to earn it. just like obama fans, most conspiracy theorists "hope" lots of people are waking up by saying it like it's a fact. even if it's true, if less people are doing stuff, or if more people are "waking up" and a smaller percentage are "acting" on it, then it's probably part of the NWO "masonic revelation of the method" plans to tell us everything anyway, and then laugh at us for doing almost nothing about it. that's where we're going.

unless this is wrong, there's no escaping it. if some of it is wrong, there's no escaping the rest. people have to wonder why "they" aren't doing anything instead of just lazily pointing the finger elsewhere. it's cheap like racism to just slag people for not knowing stuff. if you just try and tell them and they don't listen, you can get personally frustrated. if you do something significant like write a book, make a film, work with a group, etc., even if they don't "believe" you, they might respect you, and that will end your frustration.

we'll also finally respect ourselves for what we "do" instead of just what we find. it's the only thing that's ever worked. unless we actually "do" stuff, we don't really have respect for ourselves, or our abilities, or our voices. random conversations show no real effort on our part to take our issues seriously. the vicious cycle continues as we do little, succeed little, do less, succeed less, and eventually give up. as we can see from our conspiracy culture, we have to break this cycle for our own sakes and the sake of our country.

let's be what happens.




People who deny the reality of human-caused global warming are wetting their pants over the illegal theft and release of emails from scientists at the East Anglia Climate Research Unit. In their desperation, the deniers claim the emails point to a global conspiracy by the world’s scientists and government leaders to… Well, it’s hard to say what they believe the conspiracy is about. A letter to a Vancouver newspaper some time ago indicates the way many of them think. The writer claimed that people working to address global warming “are ideological zealots pursuing a quasi-religious socialist agenda to command and control western economies”.

It would be funny if it didn’t echo the thinking of so many people – even some in influential positions in government and industry – and if the situation weren’t so critical.

Sadly for the deniers and for all of us, the emails don’t show that global warming is a grand hoax or conspiracy. They do nothing to diminish the decades of overwhelming scientific evidence that the Earth is not only warming largely because of emissions from burning fossil fuels but that it’s worse than we thought. Recently, 26 scientists from Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, Canada, the U.S., and Australia released a report showing that the impacts of global warming are occurring faster and are more widespread than other reports from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had projected.

The report, titled The Copenhagen Diagnosis, summarized the most recent research from around the world, which shows that Arctic sea ice is melting faster than we thought, that both Greenland and Antarctica are losing more ice than predicted, and that sea levels are rising more quickly than anticipated. The scientists conclude that the Earth could reach several “tipping points” if we keep pumping emissions into the atmosphere at the same rate.

The report also quashes the myth of “global cooling” that has been “promoted by lobby groups and picked up in some media.” The report’s authors conclude that “even the highly ‘cherry-picked’ 11-year period starting with the warm 1998 and ending with the cold 2008 still shows a warming trend of 0.11 °C per decade.”

It’s astounding that those who deny that climate change exists or that it is human-caused, either out of self-interest or ignorance, are willing to see some grand conspiracy in a handful of stolen emails but are unwilling to see the undeniably clear evidence of the impacts of climate change already occurring around the world.

Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence, world leaders are dragging their heels in the lead-up to the Copenhagen climate summit this month. As University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver notes, in abandoning the idea of reaching a binding agreement in Copenhagen, world leaders are essentially saying that they don’t believe they owe anything to our children and grandchildren.

Unfortunately, Canada has a poor record on climate change and international negotiations to address the problem. Our government argues that the economy takes precedence over the environment. It’s incredibly short-sighted to think that a healthy economy can be maintained when the health of the planet is failing. And it’s absurd to pin our economic hopes on extracting limited supplies of dirty fossil fuels in a world that is increasingly switching to cleaner forms of energy.

Our prime minister wasn’t even planning to attend the Copenhagen summit until U.S. President Barack Obama announced that he was going. Canadians citizens can take some credit for the prime minster’s about-face. He is said to have reconsidered in part because of a recent Angus Reid poll that indicated most Canadians want him to attend.

Beyond the poll, hundreds of thousands of Canadians have told the government that we must work toward an agreement that is fair, ambitious, and binding. And 3,000 scientists recently sent an open letter urging the government “to negotiate an outcome that will rapidly and adequately address climate change”.

One of the strongest messages came from a coalition of representatives from the developing world, Commonwealth secretary-general Kamalesh Sharma, former U.K. international development secretary Clare Short, climate scientist Saleemul Huq, and British environment and development groups. They argue that Canada should be suspended from the Commonwealth for ignoring the impact of climate change on the world’s poorest countries.

Our leaders have a historic opportunity in Copenhagen to address the most serious crisis that humanity has faced. As citizens, we have the responsibility to let them know that we expect them to act.

Learn more at

* Meanwhile, let us take a look at some of his funding: *

- Rockefeller Brothers Fund (Page 23)
- NM Rothschild (Page 21)

Employee charity
Giving programs
These programs allow employees
to donate a portion of their salary
to the David Suzuki Foundation.
4Charity Foundation Inc.
Adobe Systems Incorporated
ADP Canada Co.
Ahuja Family Charitable Giving
All Charities Campaign –
Province of Manitoba
AMD Matching Gift Program
Bell Canada
Bentall Employee Group
Bird Family Fund at Strategic
Charitable Giving Foundation
BMO Employee Charitable
Canadian Association
of Chain Drug Stores
Canadian Tire
Corporation of the City
of Kitchener
EJC Charitable Fund at Strategic
Charitable Giving
Helping Hands of WorksafeBC
Hydro One Inc.
IBM Employees’ Charitable Fund
Investors Group Matching Gift
London Life Employees’
Charity Trust
Mary Maitre Fund at Strategic
Charitable Giving Foundation
Microsoft Matching Gifts
OPG Employees’ & Pensioners’
Charity Trust
Provincial Employees
Community Services Fund
Sun Life Financial
TD Waterhouse Private Giving
The Hydrecs Fund
Travel Underwriters

This man is WELL-FUNDED!


Toronto Truth Seekers (TTS)


Thursday, December 10, 2009

The 6th Column vs. 48 Hours Until Saturday's Meet-Up vs. 2010 Truthing (TTStify! ;-)



Jesse Ventura Explains 9/11 To Larry King




The 6th Column vs. 48 Hours Until Saturday's Meet-Up vs. 2010 Truthing (TTStify! ;-)


Hello TTS Family & Friends,

While it's cold as all-get-out, we're still contending with the "global warming" greenwashing during the Copenhagen Climate Change Summit December 7 - 18th. Their goal may be to get us to accept a UN world government in control of the worlds energy. Some say this is part of a totalitarian scheme by a handful of murderous oligarchs to create a scientific dictatorship to kill 85% of the worlds population. Some say they've already started and are ramping up efforts with fake "pandemics" to sell deadly "vaccines", etc.

Since this is happening in slow-motion for many of us, we can see it. Since we can see it, we can explain it to others. Since we can explain it, others can understand it and help resist it. Most people need more than just random conversations they forget later to be convinced. That's like always talking about how you "want to be an actor" or whatever and then never getting around to actually doing anything about it. People won't believe we're serious if we don't take what we say seriously. Hypocrisy is annoying.

Conspiracy Theory: It's entirely possible that "conspiracy theorists" were created by the CIA to be a "6th Column" that works for the New World Order. Our job may be to neutralize any serious resistance by them teaching us to accept that just "learning" about the New World Order and not "thinking" of doing anything serious to stop them is a "normal" and acceptable response. Worshipping conspira-priests for what they "know" instead of what they "do", or just copying intellectual masturbation, will finish us off.

Dictionary: fifth column

n. A clandestine subversive organization working within a country to further an invading enemy's military and political aims.

Caveat Emperor: Of course there are lots of good people doing good stuff, but that's often said just to make us feel good, like we're cheering for a sports team. As long as we follow the NWO's global script of vicariously experiencing thrills by just cheering for others, we'll never come close to realizing our own potential when it comes to what we can each do. This is likely by-design. Alex Jones and other Infoworkhorses don't selfishly enjoy praise; they're only logically impressed by people "taking action" as best they can.

When it comes to current (not old) "conspiracy theories" that prove (as best we can) that current government and corporate corruption is harming all of us and threatening the future of the world, just learning about them without any purpose seems irresponsible. Nearly everyone says more people are "waking up", but if less people are "doing stuff", that's the worst possible scenario. Then everyone knows what's up and nobody says or does much. Then it becomes "normal" and we all learn to live with it. That's that.

Nobody can get away with just saying "What can we do?" unless they spend at least 5 whole minutes thinking of possibilities. Most conspiracy theorists don't, won't or can't do this. Instead of just "recycling" facts and anecdotes, if we took "thinking" more seriously, within 2 minutes we'd start to come up with ideas. If we seriously discussed them with others, we'd come up with even more. Since all this seems difficult for a lot of us, it sounds like NWO conditioning is at work. We need to see the obvious and deal with it.

The Planifesto: 2009 Survival Strategy

This document should take about two hours to read and may improve your life or others' in some way

Regardless of what happens, after a year of careful agitation and investigation in conspirienced circles across Canada, I'm going to make sure that more ordinary Canadians know exactly why we're in the trouble we're in. They have to know many veteran conspiracy theorists supposedly "fighting" the New World Order for years often just do it by having random conversations. The problem is they don't work. I know. I'm good at explaining this stuff and have checked back. A week later, most people have forgotten most of it.

The basics of what we have to do have been known for years, or "wake up more people", so we just need to work on more "plans" to do this and execute them. More complex ideas can be developed later. Even moderately successful options can't logically be argued with unless the argument contains a better option. Otherwise lazy people will just tear down all possibilities without replacing them to make themselves feel good about doing nothing. Some people are smart enough to pull this scam off. It doesn't mean they should

Finally, the biggest problem with our "truth" seeking "conspiracy culture" is that everyone thinks everyone else is lying, or flakey, or un-(trust)worthy in some way. This paradox will persist in alienating people unless more people actually prove their character by doing stuff. Even then it'll be hard because nobody trusts anybody doing stuff. But hey, whatre you gonna do? With 48 hours left until the TTS street action, 2010 in two weeks and a number of aforementioned "doing stuff" options, we should start working on what we should.





Black Krishna Brand

Twitter -
Philosophy -
Music -
MySpace -
YouTube -
Radio -


Toronto Truth Seekers (TTS)


If you only listen to one thing this week...

Well, that's silly.

Just download and listen to this soon, okay? :-)


Wednesday, December 09, 2009

CKLN Radio 88.1 FM Rude Awakening: Climategate vs. Copenhagen, December 7, 2009



EPA Threatens “Command-and-Control” Economy to Push Climate Change Agenda

Kurt Nimmo
December 9, 2009

The Environmental Protection Agency’s recent declaration that the life-sustaining gas carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant is part of an effort to establish “command-and-control” role for government. EPA boss Lisa Jackson declared carbon dioxide dangerous prior to her scheduled appearance at the Copenhagen climate summit in Denmark.

Command-and-control is a military term defined as the exercise of authority and direction by a designated commanding officer over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. In the case of the EPA, the mission is to impose the globalist climate change agenda on the United States.


Greenhouse Gases on VOA's In Focus

VOA's Vincent Makori reports on how Lisa Jackson, an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, declares greenhouse gases are a threat to public health.


FYI, this is an MP3 of Monday's show courtesy of Danny Liberty, thanks a million, it's shrunk to 13 MB's for easy download. I'm trying to get copies from our radio-logger, but for now, but if anyone out there has a PVR or TiVo system and Rogers Cable channel 947, or some way of recording the show automatically from 6 - 7 am at, please let me know. I'd like to start posting the radio shows at 7 am as soon as they're done, that way people can use them to get a jump on the day's propaganda. Details are below.



CKLN Radio 88.1 FM Rude Awakening

Climate Change vs. Copenhagen

December 7, 2009

CKLN Rude Awakening is a morning news radio show hosted by Black Krishna (BK) on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays from 6 - 7 am. It can be heard on 88.1 FM or Rogers Cable 947 in Toronto, or streaming at online. This episode takes place on December 7, 2009, on the first day of the Copenhagen Meeting taking place until December 18th. With 192 countries attending, the stated goal is total UN control and regulation of the world's energy emissions to stop "global warming" or "climate change" which, combined with other international agreements, would effectively create a world government. While many had legitimate questions about the man-made "global warming" or "climate change" theories, it was finally and conclusively proven to be a giant fraud when thousands of emails and data from the top UN climate scientists at the University of East Anglia (UK) showed they know they're lying, get paid millions to lie, and discuss how to lie better and suppress any credible questioning by individuals or groups. Climategate vs. Copenhage plus the days news and other real issues are discussed, music is played, and clips from Alan Watt's "Cutting Through The Matrix" (dot com) radio show and "The Alex Jones Radio Show" ( featuring Paul Joseph Watson are shared to help explain all this. We have many problems, reactions and solutions, to explore them more, is one recommended source. Please share or use this public domain show if you'd like how you'd like.


FYI, pubic domain CKLN Radio interviews with veteran climate scientist Professor Timothy Ball on the global warming/climate change issue are below.


GLOBAL WARMING: Black Krishna and Professor Timothy Ball Explain

March 23, 2007

45 mins


PROFESSOR TIM BALL: Climate Changing Your Mind and Global Warming Your Soul

November 5, 2007

120 mins




Black Krishna Brand

Twitter -
Philosophy -
Music -
MySpace -
YouTube -
Radio -


Toronto Truth Seekers (TTS)


If you only listen to one thing this week...

Well, that's silly.

Just download and listen to this soon, okay? :-)


Tuesday, December 08, 2009

"...we need a lot more people to just straight up say "good job" so that people continue doing stuff..."


Knight Flyerer



thanks [redacted], we need a lot more people to just straight up say "good job" so that people continue doing stuff, plus people like me have more room to say "we can do even better" and how. otherwise there's no balance and i may come across like an a--hole. i'm not, but if people can find a way to feel that way, then they have an excuse to ignore me or be lazy on their own, so it happens.

i suggest keeping track of our efforts so we can leverage them beyond squeezing a few seconds into the mass media. that works, but it can work better if we can show others how we worked on it later. otherwise most people watching mainstream TV anyway will quickly jump back into their ELF radiation bath and the next chunk of propaganda will boot the facts out of their heads again.

while it's fun to play "tag" with the media and slip some "truth" in, it's not going to work on it's own outside of satisfying us. in this little game of anti-NWO chess, all they have to do is make us happy enough to stop thinking to beat us. they can do that to both civilians and the conspirienced. yes we can be happy, but we have to think about how to make more of an impact with our time.

we should also always be making suggestions and helping each other improve each others efforts. for years i've been discussing how we're all being turned into children who need "approval" for everything we do, or unconditional, un-critical and un-thinking love. see all the people who need to get their individual (fashion, relationship, etc.) decisions validated by others to feel okay with them.

the problem is eventually we all get so thin-skinned that constructive criticism makes us cry. you can see it happening now. we have to realize that we get hundreds of things right and wrong each day with all our small decisions, so it's no big deal. a mistake doesn't make you a bad person, etc. when it comes to beating the new world order, either we'll get better and do it, or we won't.

imho, more people need to start posting on this listserve. there are 200 of the 281 on the mailing list, enough to warrant a few emails a day. we're all taught to hate "spam" more than child poverty, but if we think emails that help us work on beating the new world order are "spam", then maybe we signed up to the wrong listserve. seriously. we don't have to post right now. but soon.

we should avoid our trained pavlovian 'angry' response to lots of emails. it's what killed all the "9/11 truth" and other forwards years ago that could've saved us by now. i remember getting emails with the "folded US $20 bill" or "building 7" clips, they were pretty popular until "spam!" became public enemy # 1. right now, too many are too scared to communicate for fear of offending others.

toronto truthseekers who listen and speak wisely should work to change that. instead of just forwarding a random link with nothing else, why not try describing it in a sentence or two so others are inclined to look at it. we should also have an articles section so people can organize their thoughts, especially their local ones about the city that we're trying to get people awake enough to save.

finally, if people are having trouble getting motivated to work on stuff, we know why. the new world order is sapping our strength in a million ways, but if we give up now, soon we won't have any left. people often ask where i get my energy, so i put my philosophy into a document that's based on my research plus a lot of advice i've given that's worked for years. please check it out if you'd like.

The Planifesto: 2009 Survival Strategy


fyi, from [redacted] last i checked, the website where i found it and the article are below.

there's no doubt in my mind that the thousands of flyers and dvd's we gave away helped.

if there's any doubt in anyone else's mind, tell them to come up with a better solution.

unless they can, then we know what to do right now while always thinking of more.

H1N1 pandemic ending with a whimper, not a bang

By Sharon Kirkey, Canwest News Service
December 4, 2009

Pic: A masked girl sits with a classmate at a kindergarten in a residential estate in Hong Kong on Jun. 11, 2009.

With H1N1 poised to enter history as the least deadly of four global flu pandemics, some experts are calling for an end to Canada's mass vaccination program.

Nature is already achieving what we would hope to achieve by vaccinating, they say.

H1N1's "reproductive number" — the number of people each infected person passes the virus to — was above one when the epidemic began, which led to the explosive initial increase in cases.

Now it is less than one, because many people have become immune, and each old case is making less than one new case. When the reproductive number falls below one, the epidemic can't sustain itself, and fades away.

The drop in cases suggests Canada has hit the critical fraction of the population that needs to be vaccinated to control the pandemic, says Dr. David Fisman, a University of Toronto expert in infectious disease dynamics.

Fisman can't understand the rational for continuing mass vaccinations. He said that for a virus as contagious as H1N1, fewer than 30 per cent of the population needed vaccination to reach a critical level of immunity.

"I'm sure that the vaccine has prevented some deaths. I'm sure that there are people who are alive right now who would not have been alive if we hadn't vaccinated," he says. But the pandemic was already peaking, and then subsiding before the vaccination was rolling out in force.

"That's nobody's fault, that's just how long it took to make a vaccine against a brand new virus. Those were the cards we were dealt," says Fisman, an associate professor of infectious diseases epidemiology at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health.

Despite that view, Canada's top doctor this week pleaded with Canadians to get vaccinated if they have not already done so. Chief public health officer David Butler-Jones said that, while 30 per cent of the population is now immune to H1N1, either because they have been vaccinated or because they have already been infected, "millions" of people are still at risk of infection.

Someone vaccinated today may be protected against infection two weeks from now, "if there is still enough of (H1N1) kicking around," Fisman says. But the benefit diminishes the further into the future we go, and he says other public health programs have suffered as staff and resources were redeployed to the H1N1 campaign. In some jurisdictions, breastfeeding support programs, sexually transmitted diseases clinics and other usual activities were cancelled or postponed as public health was forced to bear the brunt of delivering the largest immunization program in Canada's history.

"At this point, in terms of saying everybody must get vaccinated because there is a pandemic abroad, it's kind of done," Fisman says.

H1N1 will likely die out with a death rate lower than that for regular seasonal flu.

Harvard University infectious disease expert Marc Lipsitch is pegging H1N1's case fatality rate — the proportion of people infected with a disease who die of it — at less than 0.1 per cent, placing human swine flu in a category 1 pandemic, the lowest level of severity for a worldwide disease outbreak. Swine flu's case fatality rate is less than what was seen for the three worldwide flu outbreaks in the 20th century: 1918, 1957 and 1968.

Unless the virus mutates, and there is no strong sign H1N1 is becoming noticeably different, "it's almost certainly going to be the mildest of the four (pandemics) that we have good data on," says Lipsitch, a professor of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health.

When the World Health Organization declared the pandemic in June, officials warned the rogue virus threatened all of humanity. The reality is so far proving strikingly different from what was expected.

The world agency, and Canada, had done their pandemic planning with a different flu virus in mind. They spent five years watching H5N1, or "bird flu," which kills up to 60 per cent of those it infects.

We got off lucky when the real pandemic hit, WHO says, but the public doesn't always understand that.

"Adjusting public perceptions to suit a far less lethal virus has been problematic," WHO said in a statement Thursday, issued in response to media reports that ties with the drug industry among expert advisers may have influenced WHO's policy decisions related to H1N1.

"Given the discrepancy between what was expected and what has happened, a search for ulterior motives on the part of WHO and its scientific advisers is understandable, though without justification.

"WHO has consistently assessed the impact of the current influenza pandemic as moderate. WHO has consistently reminded the medical community, public and the media that the overwhelming majority of patients experience mild influenza-like illness and recover fully within a week, even without any form of medical treatment."

But some critics say WHO set itself up for blame.

"They had been talking for years about the possibility of some kind of reprise of the 1918 pandemic," says Philip Alcabes, author of Dread: How Fear and Fantasy Have Fueled Epidemics from the Black Death to the Avian Flu. "A huge amount of money and person power was devoted to preparing" for the next outbreak, he says.

But, "there was never any evidence, not from Day 1, and not anytime since, that this strain of flu was going to be a particularly dangerous strain, either in terms of its capacity to make people sick or its capacity to kill people," says Alcabes, associate professor in urban public health at Hunter College's School of Health Sciences in the City University of New York.

"Yet that's the story that's always been told, almost every single day since it appeared in April. 'We don't know what's going to happen.' Essentially, 'the sky might fall.'"

Lipsitch, of Harvard, says that when the first reports were coming out of Mexico, the case fatality rate estimates were as high as four per cent, which is twice the rate for the 1918 Spanish flu.

"If you don't know how bad your enemy is, you plan as if it's bad, and you hope that you're over-planning. In this case, that's exactly what was done," he says.

"I think the response has been appropriate for what we knew at each stage, but what we know has changed, because the data gets better."

© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service


Toronto Truth Seekers (TTS)


COPENSLAVEMENT TEMPERMENTAL: To Be Free or Not To Be? (Good Question!)



where and when meng. that'll do. maybe even consult a couple of us to decide first, then post an official meet-up. i like the spirit and energy and it's great working with you, but i'm not going out in the cold unless i see a game plan worth braving it for.

note: this is not a "diss" or anything that any neurotic crapanalysis can configure out. those who fail to plan, plan to fail. this is in any endeavour, including taking on a 1000 year conspiracy to enslave and kill everybody. we can take 5 minutes to plan.

at times i've noticed a tendency to just yell randomly and then get frustrated and give up quickly when no one responds. as someone who yells very carefully while no one responds, i can only say get used to it until you get better. then people will respond.

it's the same thing with making flyers. the first one you design may not be good enough for people to bother commenting on. however, that's no reason to give up and let your soul die. instead, make a second or third version. you'll see they're better.

speaking of which, i have thousands of "climategate" and "detox" flyers i'm dropping downtown tonite starting at 7:30 pm after i leave work at queen and bathurst. if anyone wants to join me they're welcome. hell, maybe i'll post a meet-up with details.

the "7.7.7" meet-up yesterday for the week may have been misconstrued. i always assume that conspiracy theorists who read tons of info will read the meet-up messages before trying to figure out what they mean. no worries, i'll simplify the next one.

either way, it's time for people to decide if they're serious or if this is all a big joke. we can all prioritize other things, but conspira-sheeple have blamed "sheeple" for doing that forever. so, it make no sense for us to hypocritically do the same thing now.

world government is being formalized at copenhagen from december 7 - 18th, or right now. while aspects were in place long before, this is the global sales-pitch to convince everyone it's a good idea. if we don't respond soon, we may have to go along with it.

nobody really wants what we think is happening to happen, so we're good. then again, if it's all a big joke, then f--k it, let's go' t-tty bar. first rounds on me. then again, if it's all not a big joke, then let's start firing all our guns in the infowar. first rounds on me.




great ideas guys, keep 'em coming and start organizing for us. we should all keep track of our efforts on this, including our efforts to bug the media. having a good resume and the courage to act on your convictions will be enough to convince most people to at least listen to you, which means our efforts at battling world government in the next 10 days will reflect well on us.

assuming this is what we do.

if we don't do stuff, then other people won't. if the people who know stuff don't do stuff, then other people won't see the point in knowing stuff. if the people who know stuff do stuff, then the people who don't do stuff will have to respect that stuff is getting done. then if they feel like doing stuff, then can see the stuff that got them to do stuff and do it too, or do other stuff.

either say we got stuff do to.

we should also share what we're doing with others, none of us can beat world government on our own, but if we keep doing stuff and telling people what stuff we're doing, eventually we could see more people do more stuff. the reason people don't do stuff now is most of the time they don't see or hear of much stuff being done. doing stuff they see will definitely change that stuff.

let's make some stuff happen.



they're awake to a lot, but their solution is not making waves and just getting more political power within the system however they can, and then pushing for more global governance over our governments and corporations. they're not interested in the "facts" for the "right" or "best" solutions that we need, just the best ones they can compromise to finally get.

me'n'doc met an ex-banker greenie who he was running for mp against in north bay. as they see it they're basically pragmatists who try to get in power to then effect change later. this is just like most young people and most "green" (i.e. "new") politicians in general who eventually get beaten into shape by the system as they try to conform to climb the rungs of power.

me, steve and jake hit up a provincial green party event and "wrchang'd" their leader frank dejong with questions, plus i recorded a city councilor candidate saying he knew about DU and corruption but still supported the war in afghanistan, it's mind-boggling stuff. anyway, they can say they're principled because they're "green" and the best shot we've got, but it's a crock.

fyi, on the eve of world government, here's the con-frontation and a new vid...

Green Party on Climate Change Taxes

On the Eve of Global Government...


hey [redacted],

no worries, [redacted] now agrees because fox news is now telling more truth than the "liberal" media. that's how it works: when the right is in charge their media lies more while their fans mindlessly cheer for their "winning" side. when the left is in charge the opposite happens. fox is so discredited that they can tell the truth and the "left" won't believe it, so they often do these days. this keeps us fighting without listening to each other. it's a brilliant trick played for centuries on us since the roman "senate" and other "democracies" enslaved people.

however, none of the mainstream media outlets tells the truth consistently enough to be "good", so they're still "bad" like the rest. both the "left" and "right" fake ideologies and supporting machinery work for the same people at the top who support both parties and the "system" the control. this way they make sure we choose between their two puppets and exclude any other possibilities for something better. this was revealed by professor carroll quigley in his book on the council on foreign relations called "tragedy and hope". a friend has a copy. he was bill clinton's mentor at georgetown law school and a CFR historian.

btw, all this copenhagen crap this had nothing to do with the environment. that's why they're worried about "carbon dioxide" instead of the many real toxins killing us and the earth. this is about using a UN world government to control every aspect of our lives using phony environmental laws that will lower our living standards, steal our property, spy on us, take our rights, control every aspect of government, set up communist-style community councils, tax us to death and more.

for example, the use of 1/3 of farmland for failed bio-fuels that cost more energy to produce also doubled world food prices in the last year. that's bad for us, but it killed lots of people in the third world. the people in charge don't mind doing this, just see the 20th century and the conditions of the world's population and what they're doing about fixing it, which hasn't been and isn't much. putting the same people in charge of a world government just means they can bypass our elected representatives and enslave or kill more people, which may be their plan.

btw, do you believe in "over-population"? it's not true, but that's their doing. the people who rule over us have similar elitist mentalities that see us as "human resources" to be used like a farmer uses sheep. they've been recycling the need to "cull" populations for centuries using wars, famines, taxation, etc. in reality the whole world could live in australia with a home and some land to grow their own food and share it with others. if you don't believe me, just take the world's population and the square footage of australia and see for yourself.

in fact, just read anything i've written or anything i send you on this subject, it sounds like you never have. i've included the article i sent you in the last email one more time below, the link is there or the entire thing is copied. this complete inability to understand anything i'm saying may continue happening forever, but it's not a good sign. the media talks to us like children and we don't talk much about serious issues, so the result is a weakening of our cognitive abilities.

it's too bad, but i can't let it bother me much. everyone who carefully listens to what i say understands it, including people who believe in mainstream nonsense. you can theorize about what might happen, but there are rare facts available that can improve your theories. it's cool, the [redacted] can't believe it either, but he's heard my show and he knows i'm not wrong, so he's in a tough spot just like you are when it comes to liking me but not believing me for whatever reason.

it doesn't matter anyway, it's not your responsibility as a [redacted] to figure this stuff out, you should do whatever you want at this point, you've paid enough into the system and the system should let people like you relax. however, there are men out there who have the capacity to deal with this, once we find more we're in business. if you're ever in the mood to learn what's really going on, see, it's what i've been saying for the last few years because it's true. the quality of the news and analysis is better, which is also one reason why mine is.

btw, if he's lying then it's no big deal, but my research says he's not.


Who Will Stand Up Against the Coming Global Climate Tyranny?

Adam Murdock, M.D.
December 6, 2009

This week, President Obama and the leaders of the world are to meet to determine the fate of humanity. This meeting, to be held in Copenhagen, has as its’ mission to bind the nations of the world under a climatocracy, or rather a climate regulatory scheme devised and operated by bureaucrats and elitists. The members of this climatocracy will profit while the rest of humanity will sink into darkness. There will be nowhere to hide; no oasis to be found in the desert. Indeed, after the discussions have concluded will our freedoms also be concluded? Will humanity be plunged into a global tyranny governed by a state of climate fear or will we be able to stop them before it is too late? There have never been greater stakes for the freedom of mankind.

Over the past couple decades globalists like Al Gore and Maurice Strong have used the cloak of pseudo climate science as their veil. Now that ‘climategate’ has removed the curtain and shone the light on the slithering cockroaches within the backrooms of climate cookbookery, there is no longer any debate about the science. The only thing that now exists is laid bare before our eyes – a deliberate attempt to subjugate the people of the earth to global governance under the guise of science.

As the newly ‘elected’ EU President Von Rompuy puts it:

“2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”

This goal as stated by the EU President was made prior to the recent revelations about the padding of the climate data by key climate scientists. Yet, what has been the response of the very leaders now proceeding on with the conference? Have they toned down their rhetoric or better yet admitted the charade that the conference represents? Unfortunately, they have done the exact opposite. They have continued their relentless course toward the “global management” of our planet as if nothing has happened. It is as if they are willing to deny that the sun is shining at noonday when it is clearly visible. I can fathom no other reason for these leaders to do this, unless climate change is not really the goal but only a means to an end. Now that their desired end is so close it appears that they are not about to let some emails or real science get in the way of global progress.

It appears that although the fraud has been revealed, the deck may have been stacked against humanity. Indeed, the stacked deck may have already been dealt. My only hope is that the clock has not already struck midnight on our freedoms.

Now is the time to make your collective voices heard. Once the treaties have been signed and freedom has been lost there will be very little we can do to rescind such agreements. Call your local, state, and federal representatives wherever you live. Do it for your children, do it for your country, do it for your freedom to live and breathe as you see fit.

A life of regret will not make up for inaction at this time. Let us hold up a flag of liberty to everyone around us and rally them to the cause of freedom at this crucial moment in our history.

Adam Murdock, M.D. is founder of The Freemen Institute,


Learn more here:


Monday, December 07, 2009

COPENSLAVIN' SUPPLEMENTAL: What Will Canadians Who kNWO Do About This?




COPENSLAVIN' SUPPLEMENTAL: What Will Canadians Who kNWO Do About This?


do any conspiracy theorists want to fight world government?

can learning all this stuff also help us think of solutions?

hey now, i'm just saying, this is probably the time.

otherwise there isn't much point in doing stuff.

even karmically we lose by doing the least.

we can show we are what we say we are.

this week will probably tell the tale.

will we try to save our country?

were we lying about trying?

perhaps we will see.

it's not that hard.

so. let's. go.

then again...

being reasonable...

and just hypothetically speaking...

let's assume we're right about all this stuff.

and it's a very real possibility given all the evidence.

with knowledge comes power; with power responsibility.

canadian children will judge us on how (if) we resisted slavery.

it seems the next few years will be hell if we fail; so we shouldn't.

meanwhile, somebody should say something before none of us can.

we have more than enough leadership and experience to figure this out.

after 6 months at dundas square, plus-plus, we're in the best shape to move.

most canadians won't have a chance to help save their country unless we tell them.

the opportunity to speak to people who "need" to hear us is finally here for us all to enjoy.

we should use this chance to finally expose the world government before it cracks down on us.

once lots of people know exactly where we're coming from, and how many of us there are, they won't.



incidentally, after decades of intensifying propaganda and shortening attention spans, if we don't get to people now, their heads will be filled with so much green gobbledygook that they'll be impossible to reach later. if you try to fight science with science, they'll just get really frustrated and demand the simple answer of all of us being told what to do so we're all equal. people believe us selfish children have been bad for using too much stuff, so now we have to use a lot less forever to save the earth.

check out the cover of the toronto star today. like i said, this is the beginning of our total immersion into world government gaia-worship mind-control taxation-hell. so many people will be making money off this that we won't be able to stop them. if we miss this opportunity to piggy-back the mass media's coverage and share alternative ideas while people are interested in the topic, then later when everybody's made up their minds and moved on, nobody will want to hear them. let's move on this.

Star joins global climate crusade

As the Copenhagen summit kicks off today, 56 newspapers in 45 countries have united to demand action.

Today 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial. We do so because humanity faces a profound emergency.

Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage our planet, and with it our prosperity and security. The dangers have been becoming apparent for a generation. Now the facts have started to speak: 11 of the past 14 years have been the warmest on record, the Arctic ice-cap is melting and last year's inflamed oil and food prices provide a foretaste of future havoc. In scientific journals the question is no longer whether humans are to blame, but how little time we have left to limit the damage. Yet so far the world's response has been feeble and half-hearted.

Climate change has been caused over centuries, has consequences that will endure for all time, and our prospects of taming it will be determined in the next 14 days. We call on the representatives of the 192 countries gathered in Copenhagen not to hesitate, not to fall into dispute, not to blame each other but to seize opportunity from the greatest modern failure of politics. This should not be a fight between the rich world and the poor world, or between East and West. Climate change affects everyone, and must be solved by everyone.

The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global emissions to peak and begin falling within the next five to 10 years. A bigger rise of 3-4C – the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow inaction – would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea.

The controversy over emails by British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which these predictions are based.

Few believe that Copenhagen can any longer produce a fully polished treaty; real progress towards one could only begin with the arrival of President Obama in the White House and the reversal of years of U.S. obstructionism. Even now the world finds itself at the mercy of American domestic politics, for the president cannot fully commit to the action required until the U.S. Congress has done so.

But the politicians in Copenhagen can and must agree on the essential elements of a fair and effective deal and, crucially, a firm timetable for turning it into a treaty. Next June's UN climate meeting in Bonn should be their deadline. As one negotiator put it: "We can go into extra time but we can't afford a replay."

At the deal's heart must be a settlement between the rich world and the developing world covering how the burden of fighting climate change will be divided – and how we will share a newly precious resource: the trillion or so tonnes of carbon that we can emit before the mercury rises to dangerous levels.

Rich nations like to point to the arithmetic truth that there can be no solution until developing giants such as China take more radical steps than they have so far. But the rich world is responsible for most of the accumulated carbon in the atmosphere – three-quarters of all carbon dioxide emitted since 1850. It must now take a lead, and every developed country must commit to deep cuts which will reduce their emissions within a decade to very substantially less than their 1990 level.

Developing countries can point out they did not cause the bulk of the problem, and also that the poorest regions of the world will be hardest hit. But they will increasingly contribute to warming, and must thus pledge meaningful and quantifiable action of their own. Though both fell short of what some had hoped for, the recent commitments to emissions targets by the world's biggest polluters, the United States and China, were important steps in the right direction.

Social justice demands that the industrialized world dig deep into its pockets and pledge cash to help poorer countries adapt to climate change, and clean technologies to enable them to grow economically without growing their emissions. The architecture of a future treaty must also be pinned down – with rigorous multilateral monitoring, fair rewards for protecting forests, and the credible assessment of "exported emissions" so that the burden can eventually be more equitably shared between those who produce polluting products and those who consume them. And fairness requires that the burden placed on individual developed countries should take into account their ability to bear it.

The transformation will be costly, but many times less than the bill for bailing out global finance – and far less costly than the consequences of doing nothing.

Many of us, particularly in the developed world, will have to change our lifestyles. The era of flights that cost less than the taxi ride to the airport is drawing to a close. We will have to shop, eat and travel more intelligently. We will have to pay more for our energy, and use less of it.

But the shift to a low-carbon society holds out the prospect of more opportunity than sacrifice. Already some countries have recognized that embracing the transformation can bring growth, jobs and better quality lives. The flow of capital tells its own story: last year for the first time more was invested in renewable forms of energy than producing electricity from fossil fuels.

Kicking our carbon habit within a few short decades will require a feat of engineering and innovation to match anything in our history. But whereas putting a man on the moon or splitting the atom were born of conflict and competition, the coming carbon race must be driven by a collaborative effort to achieve collective salvation.

Overcoming climate change will take a triumph of optimism over pessimism, of vision over short-sightedness, of what Abraham Lincoln called "the better angels of our nature."

It is in that spirit that 56 newspapers from around the world have united behind this editorial. If we, with such different national and political perspectives, can agree on what must be done then surely our leaders can too.

The politicians in Copenhagen have the power to shape history's judgment on this generation: one that saw a challenge and rose to it, or one so stupid that we saw calamity coming but did nothing to avert it. We implore them to make the right choice.


STOP WORLD GOVERNMENT WEEK: December 7th @ 7 am @ 7 pm @ Whenrever We Can! :-)


'Climategate' Shadow Looms Over Copenhagen Summit


Announcing a new Meetup for Toronto Truth Seekers (TTS)!

What: STOP WORLD GOVERNMENT WEEK: December 7th @ 7 am @ 7 pm @ Whenrever We Can! :-)

When: December 7, 2009 @ 7:00 PM

City Hall
100 Queen Street W
Toronto, ON M5H 2N2

NOTE: We're not meeting here, we're doing things together and independently for a week.


STOP WORLD GOVERNMENT WEEK: December 7th @ 7 am @ 7 pm @ Whenrever We Can! :-)


Hello TTS Family & Friends,

As many of us know, in the next 11 days from December 7 - 18th, Canada and 192 countries worldwide are supposed to sign the Copenhagen Agreement to create a global governance structure to put the worlds energy use under the control of the United Nations. This is worse than other bad trade deals and can't be escaped. This can be confirmed by quotes from the new head of the European Union and a respectable British Lord below.

Problem + Reaction = Solution is often how the establishment herds us along. They create and define our problems, and unless we expose them, they could have billions of people cheering for the global governance solution being offered. Canadians are being made to feel guilty and sacrifice to stop "global warming" or "climate change", except if we give up all our stuff, there's no guarantee the people in charge now will ever give it back.

Greenpeace activists scale roof of Parliament Buildings

Toronto Sun | December 7, 2009

OTTAWA - A group of Greenpeace activists has created a major security breach on Parliament Hill this morning, climbing on to the West Block roof to bring attention to climate change. The group are now being confronted by police at the scene, although there has been no effort made to force them down.

'Dirty' image puts Canada in climate doghouse at Copenhagen

Eric Reguly and Nathan Vanderklippe | Globe & Mail | December 7, 2009

The country “is the dirty old man of the climate world,” according to a recent Guardian article. Another prominent article published ahead of the Copenhagen climate-change summit called it a “corrupt petro-state.” Various diplomats and scientists have rallied for its expulsion from international organizations. China? Venezuela or an oil-stained African state? Try Canada.

Who Will Stand Up Against the Coming Global Climate Tyranny?

Adam Murdock, M.D. | Infowars | December 6, 2009

... There have never been greater stakes for the freedom of mankind.

... As the newly ‘elected’ EU President Von Rompuy puts it: “2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

4 mins + 4 million views

On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

One reason most Canadians don't know about our descent into (a very bad) global government is because the small percentage of Canadians who do know aren't trying very hard to tell the rest. People can just hope that others will look into these things. But that's just not practical. Canadians deserve a chance to defend their country against world government by learning that it exists, that it's been a long time coming, and that it's here.

Canada's Kyoto legacy

Jill Mahoney | Globe & Mail | December 4, 2009

... “We forget that it was the Kyoto Protocol that actually, for the first time, brought climate change to the national agenda in Canada,” said Meinhard Doelle, an environmental law professor at Dalhousie University.

Global Warming Petition Project

31,486 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs

"We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind."

Scientists sign petition denying man-made global warming

Graham Tibbetts | London Telegraph | May 30, 2008

The 31,000 academics, including 9,000 with PhDs, claim that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane are actually beneficial for the environment. The petition was created in 1998 by an American physicist, the late Frederick Seitz, in response to the Kyoto Protocol a year earlier.

The "Climategate" leaked or hacked U of East Anglia emails scandal revealed conclusive proof that top UN scientists tasked with blaming man's output of "carbon dioxide" for "global warming" or "climate change" know they're lying, get paid millions to lie and discuss how to lie better and destroy any credible questioning. We should really tell people about this. Below the articles is a flyer option, please regionally adapt and share it.

EDITORIAL: Media complicity in Climategate

Washington Times | December 7, 2009

A tale of destroyed documents, fraud, conspiracy and the misuse of millions of government dollars would seem to have all the juicy ingredients of a scandal that journalists would kill to cover. However, the mainstream media apparently doesn't think that Climategate is news. ABC News hasn't deemed the story newsworthy. Neither has CBS nor NBC. If Americans only got their news from the networks, they would not know about the global-warming fraud or would merely think there was a simple misunderstanding about what scientists meant in some vague e-mails

Never mind that two major universities have at least temporarily removed prominent academics from heading major climate research facilities. Never mind that there are real questions raised about the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) controversial assessment report that the Obama administration and global-warming advocates have continually hyped in order to advance their case for new global regulations to curtail purported global warming.

Climategate; The Supporting Cast - Thought Police Anyone?

Professor Tim Ball | Canada Free Press | December 7, 2009

... The big change came when computer modelers took over climate science. I knew modeling global climate was impossible; apart from the inadequate surface and upper atmosphere database computer capacity was and is still inadequate. At conference after conference I watched modelers bully everybody. Models are the most corrupt part of the CRU and IPCC fiasco, an exposure yet to emerge. They produced the ridiculous ‘predictions’ of disaster used to promote control through fear.

Don't let ‘Climategate' melt down your portfolio

Avner Mandelman | Globe & Mail | December 4, 2009

... This, in effect, is what's happening now: global warming has become a near-religious test of civic virtue, just as being invested in Internet stocks became a test of investment savvy in 2000.

Copenhagen: climate change sceptics have been outmanoeuvred. For now.

Will Heaven | London Telegraph | December 7, 2009

Just half of Britain believes in man-made climate change, a Sunday Telegraph poll has revealed. The figure didn’t surprise me in the least.

From December 7 - 18th, the Canadians that know what's happening in Copehagen should let others know so that we can work together to resist it and protect our country. These flyers are 6 to a page, double-sided. For 3-cents per page or 6-cents double-sided at a small printer, plus $1 per cut at Kinko's if they can't cut them. You can make a high-quality glossy master copy, then print thousands, flyer cars, drop them in mailboxes, etc.

Featuring the David Dees "Church of Climatology" on the front and "CLIMATEGATE: IT'S OVER" plus text on the back.

PwrPt -


We can easily provide others enough evidence to blow the lid off the whole global governance carbon-taxing scam. However, if we don't care, then they won't care. Or, if the New World Order sees that lots of Canadians know but won't do anything, then they'll just laugh at us and move ahead with their plans. It's happening right now. Before government, corporate and foundation propagandists overwhelm us all, we all need to fight back.

Finally, this is just one idea meant to help produce more. Instead of rallies where like-minded people just blow-off some steam and go home; or instead of individually writing our politicians who already ignore us; we should find ways to reach out to ordinary Canadians concerned about their future. Many have some idea of what's happening, so as long as those who've researched it more give them a few details they can share, then we can win.



Learn more here: