Friday, August 11, 2006

VISHWAMITRA II: This Time It's Personal

on the last two, of course: the jews deserve a place to live free and prosper like every single human being on god's earth, and the holocaust happened and was indeed a terrible tragedy.

but, that doesn't excuse every single action they now take against anybody else who was never even involved in their "holocaust" persecution forever and ever and ever and ever and ever...

for instance, if i got robbed a few years ago, do i have a right to go around robbing people?

that's asinine, it makes no sense, and that's what the "government" is doing to the "people" - propagandizing them into saying any criticism of the israeli government is "anti-semitic", and thus letting their government get away with anything they want.

it's just like anti-americanism: if i'm against torturing people, am i anti-american? or am i just a reasonable intelligent and compassionate human being? if i want people to "have a right to a fair trial" - or - ANY freakin' trial at all, does that make me anti-american? if i'm against nuking iran and syria and the rest of the middle-east into the stone-age, am i anti-american? if i'm against using depleted uranium to poison thousands of soldiers, millions of arabs, and billions of people around the world with the blowing particles of toxic dust, am i anti-american? if i'm into giving your soldiers healthcare and counseling (which your government doesn't - LISTEN to the soldiers complaining) and an actual "mission" to "accomplish" instead of training them to randomly grab arabs out of their houses and throw them in secret prisons - an act that dehumanizes both parties for no discernible reason with no evidence it's succeeding at doing anything, am i anti-american? if i'm against your "stop-loss program" that acts as a neverending draft until soldiers are either dead or deranged, amd i anti-american? if i'm against the patriot act and the hundreds of other police state measures that are destroying your beautiful and world-renowned american constitution and bill of rights, am i anti-american? if i'm against the most secretive and paranoid and evil government in american history (screw "where's waldo", where's cheney?) classifying "125 documents a minute" (NY Times) and refusing to answer more and more questions due to "national security", am i anti-american? if i'm into FINALLY securing your borders and ports to REALLY protect you against terrorists (which bush refuses to do) and illegal immigrants that are driving down wages for average americans and helping to destroy your economy, am i anti-american? if i'm into giving every american citizen guaranteed healthcare and pensions unlike your current administration, am i anti-american?

okay, if it's a choice between supporting your government brainwashing and sodomizing your own citizens and attacking the rest of the world or not... (sigh)... then okay, if you absolutely must insist, then i guess i am...

they're making normal and intelligent jews, americans and others into virulent racists, and yet if you actually talk to people with alternatives they make complete sense: take the billions of dollars used on bombing people and put it into generating healthy economies and healthy people. everybody wins and gets along, the richer nations with a huge head-start will still stay wealthier for years, the whole world benefits. and, just like the multi-coloured diaspora that is north america and many other parts of the world, when people are given a chance to do anything but fight or resist oppression: people will chill out.

i mean, there are 200 million muslims in india who've lived largely peacefully with the majority hindu's for years, i've been there several times, i've walked from hindu markets to muslim markets freely, and i've watched each culture operate with mutual respect for how they want to live their lives. when riots flared up there were usually only a few hundred at most killed, not bad for a country of over a billion people - especially when you see what happened in the former yugoslavia when they had their ethnic tensions inflamed. however, just like here, it's only when a racist, fascist regime like the BJP or "Hindu Nationalist Party" gets in power and gets the people angry at each othr for no good reason that people start to hate each other - and they've just gotten better, and better, and better at this over the years...

to wit part I: you'd have to agree that governments have massive amounts of control over our societies, and can pretty much do whatever they want - who's going to stop them?

to wit part II: there are no economic arguments that are relevant to governments - especially in western cultures. if they want they can just borrow money until our great-grandkids are screwed and loot the national treasury - as president bush has done in taking you from a $5 trln surplus to a $7 trln debt - and asking for more of YOUR money in removing all of your social improvement programs and gambling your pensions in the stock market.

to wit part III: if our societies are screwed up, it's not "our" fault, it's the government's fault. and that's that. whenever two people or groups are arguing with each other, it's best that they look above the fray and find out who put them in the position to "argue" in the first place. you have to understand that ALL the efforts that prevent us from criticizing them or prevent us from listening to their critics are specifically designed and engineered by them to allow them to grow as powerful and corrupt as they want. and that's that.

to wit part IV: the bush regime has spent over $1.6 bln on "fake news" (just Google it), and when the Government Accountability Office said it was illegal, he just said he'd do it anyway - like the torture, NSA spying, and the 750 other laws he's broken (Boston Globe) so far. when you see how effectively they hide their corruption from the general public even when it's been openly discussed in mainstream news articles which are often written but never repeated, then you can see exactly how much power and control they have over who we unfairly blame instead of them. the mainstream press has been infiltrated by intelligence agencies for years, see: Carl "Watergate!" Bernstein's article in Rolling Stone Magazine from the 1970's, or just ask anyone who knows anything about this at all, and when you see how little they do to help those who need it most it's only logical that they don't want that fact exposed much. they're "the government", so they grab headlines while we've got deadlines - so that's often all we see and dumbly repeat to each other in useless conversations that in no way improve our lives. and when their lies are exposed we too often miss it, or we're confused into ignoring obvious evidence of illegal activity far worse than President Richard Millhouse Nixon bugging the hotel rooms of his opposition - for which he was impeached. and that's that.

i'm not anti-semitic, i'm not anti-american, i'm not anti-canadian or against any "people" in the entire world. i'm not even against all the germans who took part in WW2 - or - by your logic - shouldn't their country have been nuked off the face of the earth? if they killed 6 million jews and maybe 20 million people in total, then why weren't they nuked at least once instead of japan being nuked twice?

how many of "our" people did japan kill?

don't make it up like people are making up the stupid fantasies around the threat of hezbollah: LOOK. understand that - as journalist Seymour Hersh has noted, Clinton was the first President since WW2 to bomb white people in Kosovo. now, he was no perfect little angel, but this FACT exposes just how racist your foreign policy has been - and still IS.

and if this "islamo-fascism" garbage was so much in style in the muslim world, then where the hell have hezbollah been for the last 5 years? why weren't they and the numerous other groups who hate american foreign policy working with and supporting al-qaeda? why haven't they been supposedly threatening us until a month ago?

the reason is simple: the CIA founded and funded al-qaeda to battle the soviets in afghanistan, and have since worked with "osama bin laden" or "tim osman" - his CIA code name - for the last 25 years.

and the reason he's getting a lot more publicity now while NEVER BEING CAUGHT is simple: bush sr. was the former CIA Director, the bush family have benefited massively off the bin laden family's investing in them, bush jr. has NO INTEREST IN CAPTURING HIM AND NEVER EVEN TALKS ABOUT IT, and now they're working together yet again to scare the crap out of the america.

once they do that, you'll support them until they have total military control over america, a country with 5% of the world's population that does 50% of the world's military spending. and, once they have that they can use the american military to attack the rest of the world.

(see: The World. Right. Now. Look. Again. Closely.)

and once they do that, who can stop them?

who's going to play "america" to cheney's "nazi germany?"

who can?

as for making you feel better, i'm sorry, but as you've said yourself you get a lot of that, and if you recall i tried to do a lot of that as well. i've also restricted myself on a minute-by-minute basis for years, and listened politely to bullsh-t arguments being bandied about by smart friends while smiling and nodding and pitying their ignorance.

i'm done picking and choosing when to make points like a leper instead of a leader, and i'm done letting smart people repeat stupid things until they become stupid themselves.

it's been frustrating and complicated, and it's not helping anyone i know feel happier when they're being made miserable by propaganda - or turning off from watching the (fake) "news" entirely since it's too depressing (on purpose) - which only leaves your government less and less and less and less accountable to public opinion.

they're addicting people to the "endless war" they've planned which will allow them to corrupt americans into supporting their imperialist ambitions, they're provoking countries into attacking them to justify their own "false flag/inside job" staged terror attacks, and while we're all scared and distracted they're secretly change "laws" that won't be there when we finally figure this mess out and need them - and this is happening all over the world.

no more.

you're a smart young man and this is a conversation, and if it bums you out then it should - what's coming next is even more of a bummer.

to wit: if i'm right, who's bumming you out more, me or your government? and, what's the bigger bummer, me talking about all of the concentration camps they're building or our governments dragging us into them?

i empathize - i've been wrestling with the issues of revealing what i know to people i know for a long, long, long time. in fact, i wish i'd spoken to you a few months ago when this stuff was less pressing, and when i was goofing off under massive pressure from friends who knew i'd be "leaving" to take on this fight full time. i know what they want, they want "fun-Vij!", he's an awesome guy, and he cheers people up everywhere he goes with his increasing charm, intelligence and wit.

in fact, i'll even give you another call and i'll let you chat with him.

but please, listen: i honestly thought i had until 2008, i was just going to finish doing this crap and then retire to a relaxing life of consulting part-time. when i first started i thought we were playing offense - i.e. i thought we had a decent system with some flaws, and i just wanted to fix the flaws. now with every day that passes it becomes clearer and clearer that we're playing defense against increasingly malicious forces behind the governments we've elected, WE KNOW THIS, that's why as much as we're "supporting" our governments, we're also completely "terrified" of them - just like in communist dictatorships.

we also all know politicians are corrupt, but i know who's corrupting them, and i know how little they think of us. they want an 80% population reduction among other horrible measures, they've been behind numerous sterilization and dehumanization efforts that have helped create a "Third World" - i mean how the hell did THAT happen over the last 50 years? and with the nutcases in control of your government, they're finishing the job of gaining total control over all of us right now at the barrell of many, many, many, many big guns.

here's a short video on "The Bilderberg Group", who are the richest and most powerful people in the world. they're not the CEO's of banks and big oil, they're the mostly the old-moneyed OWNERS of banks and big oil, and by extension governments and media. they're probably the biggest group behind this attack on the world. they've been secretly meeting since 1954 and admit they're discussing "policy", i did a story on them, but this guy's is better...

and here's a short video of the ending of a speech by President John F. Kennedy called "The President and The Press", it's a timely, timeless and terrific talk given before an audience of journalists asking them to hold him accountable while helping him expose the "secret societies" (just like President Eisenhower asked as well) that were trying to destroy the sovereignty of the united states. we didn't listen, and now they're closer to succeeding than ever before...

so, there's literally BILLIONS of people trained to speak "happy", and talk about "Paris Hilton's new video!" and "Brangelina" and buy and buy and buy and buy stuff - including products and propaganda, and i even made sure i still spoke the language to ensure i kept the "big tent party" approach - and to advise groups working on this issue how to avoid their own versions of "group think" that can render them unable to communicate their messages effectively to others. so yeah, i can talk silly for a while, and while it used to be days, it's now down to a couple of hours at most, and that "chill out man!" stuff which is so in-style in a world obviously getting worse is also why we're on the verge of total destruction: who do you think is selling us to "relax and chill out?" and telling us to tell each other "don't get all political?"

in successful countries they talk about politics until they get their politicians to fix their problems, and america used to do this too.

in modern day america, you're told to blindly support your "politicians" in being asked to support your "country". if you or anyone else anywhere in the world wants to support your "country", you sure as hell wouldn't support your "politicians", and in fact would support the people helping to hold them accountable.

so, i'm afraid i've got to come out more publicly and more consistently, and carry on the legacy of our great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great... (etc.) grandfather Vishwamitra, and point out to the people how power is pushing us around unfairly.

whether it works or not, who knows?

either way, i'm glad i'm giving it a shot...


Peace by playing your position...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

FYI - World War Three has started and they're going to kill some of us and stick the rest of us in camps. (This sucks, but...)

[Ed note: This'll suck a lot worse if we let it get worse, so check out the original article and the LINKS to stuff that makes you scratch your head. It's all documented, and it's all true. And, it all sucks. But, it'll suck a lot worse if we let it get worse...]

Red Alert For Staged Government Terror Attack

Terror alert a trial balloon for invasion of Iran, World War III

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | August 10 2006

Today's red level terror alert in symbiosis with escalation of conflict in the Middle East is the trial balloon for a massive staged false flag terror attack, blamed on Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda, that will light the blue touch paper for World War Three.

Radio host Alex Jones, who predicted a staged attack on the World Trade Center involving the use of Osama bin Laden as a fall guy in July 2001, has now gone on record with a second prediction that a staged government terror attack will occur before the end of October unless a gargantuan effort to prevent it is launched.

Only through a massively increased counter-propaganda effort on behalf of all truth activists can prevent an imminent cataclysmic horror show that will make 9/11 look like a walk in the park.

We have exhaustively documented that criminal elements in control of major western governments have carried out terror attacks and deliberately manufactured fake alerts for political purposes.

In 2002, then White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told the Washington Times that terror alerts were issued "as a result of all the controversy that took place last week," referring to political heat bestowed on President Bush when 9/11 prior knowledge evidence first surfaced.

From this point onwards smoking guns of government complicity in 9/11 became intrinsically linked with fake terror alerts.

In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bush’s approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administration’s black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America.

World Net Daily commented,

“Other sources within the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency said the administration is pressuring intelligence agencies to develop "something, anything" to support an array of non-specific terrorism alerts issued by the White House and the Department of Homeland Security…CHB reported that FBI and CIA sources said a recent White House memo listing the war on terrorism as a definitive political advantage and fund-raising tool is just one of many documents discussing how to best utilize the terrorist threat.”

Since those early admissions, every single major terror alert that the US, UK or Canadian government has issued has proven to be completely fraudulent and scripted.

Two months ago this website, in an article entitled 'Nexus Points Emerge For Potential Summer Attack,' predicted that, "Numerous nexus points have emerged that suggest major western governments are preparing for a summer terror attack that will come close to but not match 9/11 in scale and will provide the justification needed for an air strike on Iran before the midterm elections in early November."

Government mouthpieces in the US, UK and Israel are all hyping the inevitability of a Hezbollah nuke attack on a major western or Israeli city, which will provide the perfect justification for Neo-Fascist bloodsuckers to expand the war from Lebanon into Syria and Iran.

Developments today indicate that the governments of the US and the UK are engaging in a process of announcing the prevention of numerous terror plots, in order to prepare the groundwork for a real attack, under protest that they did all they could to defend the people, but that one attack slipped through.

Arrests in the US, the UK and Canada of supposed terror cells that in each case turn out to be low grade morons, victims of government entrapment, or outright fabricated evidence, are part of this conditioning process.

We have provided links to all our investigations of these staged terror alerts and more at the end of this article.

Watershed leaps in the public profile of the 9/11 truth movement directly correlate to the staging of scripted terror alerts. Each time a new national poll is released showing more people questioning the official story of 9/11, a terror alert or a high profile terror arrest is announced. Last time around it was the arrest of Al-Zarqawi - now it's a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a plot masterminded by admitted US government agent Ramzi Youssef.

The ramifications for the freedoms of all westerners and the very lives of thousands of Iranians and Syrians, as well as US troops, are too grave to even contemplate.

We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.

We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.

We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.


Seven Morons In A Warehouse

Sears Tower: US Government Creates Another Al-Qaeda Cell

Cooked Canary Wharf Terror Plot Recycled

Canadian 'Terror Plot' Begins To Unravel

Hyped Terror Raid Proves To Be Paper Tiger

Toledo Terrorists and Government Entrapment

Twenty-Three Intel Experts Say LA Terror Plot a Sham

Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot

NYC Subway "Plot": Just Another Fake Terror Alert









Peace by paying attention to "people"...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

EPILOGUE: "Each one teach one..."

here you go dood, the reason they're scaring the hell out of us right now is so they can start WW3, they're even openly bragging about it, and as long as we believe them then they're going to kill billions of people - including millions of us.

so yeah, sure, sometimes it's fun being a charismatic and knowledgable activist who hasn't been confused into hating the wrong people for bad reasons he can't seem to explain, but right now, it's certainly not.

after all, while i've known for a while that a small group of insane elite old-moneyed idiots want to brainwash some of us into wiping the rest out before they kill the people who helped them do it (see: Hitler's "Night of the Long Knives") so they can maintain control (see: what they just did and how little they cared when they lied to you and destroyed your economy), right now i'm afraid they're closer than ever to succeeding - and THAT sucks.

so yeah, it's the middle of the summer and i'm skippin' on the chix and flix and patio-kicks. bummmer.

anyway, check the links within the articles text for the head-scratching stuff, and spread the word before they create "free speech zones" that don't include your mind anymore...


Red Alert For Staged Government Terror Attack

Terror alert a trial balloon for invasion of Iran, World War III

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | August 10 2006



and this is where they'll put us...

(...) Concentration Camp Archive

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst; the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"

- The Gulag Archipelago, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


City mass evacuation drawn up

This Is London

Plans have been drawn up by the Government for a mass evacuation of London in the event of a terrorist attack, it has been reported. Leaked documents detail how residents could be herded into "rest and reception areas" in the Home Counties.

London could be evacuated if attacked


The Blair Government reportedly has secret plans to evacuate London and other big cities in the event of a terrorist strike or threat. They include herding Londoners into "rest and reception areas" in the country, and raise the possibility of rehousing the displaced for the medium or long term if an attack renders an area uninhabitable.

Camps For Citizens: Ashcroft's Hellish Vision

LA Times

Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political embarrassment to being a constitutional menace.

General Ashcroft's Detention Camps

Village Voice

Under the Justice Department's new definition of "enemy combatant"—which won the enthusiastic approval of the president and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld—anyone defined as an "enemy combatant," very much including American citizens, can be held indefinitely by the government, without charges, a hearing, or a lawyer. In short, incommunicado.

FEMA Preparing for Mass Destruction Attacks on Cities


FEMA, the federal agency charged with disaster preparedness, is engaged in a crash effort to prepare for multiple mass destruction attacks on U.S. cities - including the creation of sprawling temporary cities to handle millions of displaced persons, NewsMax has learned.

FEMA’s Plan for Mass Destruction Attacks: Of Course It’s True


Let me state for the record that FEMA is moving ahead with plans to create temporary cities that could handle millions of Americans after mass destruction attacks on U.S. cities.

Foundations are in place for martial law in the US


Recent pronouncements from the Bush Administration and national security initiatives put in place in the Reagan era could see internment camps and martial law in the United States.

Rights panelist foresees internment push

Miami Herald

A member of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission said Friday that he could foresee a scenario in which the public would demand internment camps for Arab Americans if Arab terrorists strike again in this country.

Vast quarantine role advocated for states

Detroit Free Press

In the event of a bio-terrorist attack using a deadly and contagious disease such as smallpox, public health officials want to be able to close roads and airports, herd people into stadiums, and, if necessary, quarantine entire infected cities.

Concentration Camps in Okanagon County?


Okanogan County Commissioner Dave Schulz says he's convinced his county is a designated home for a "concentration camp'' in case of civil unrest.


Alex Jones

All Americans to be under house arrest, public school children undergo practice drills where they are relocated to "secret locations" (FEMA camps). Red alert means you are the enemy!


Thursday, August 10, 2006

"It's crazy, on all of these new cop shows they're no longer reading us our Rights..." (Courtesy of The Monk on the Couch)


i'm with you, unfortunately these little wins aren't quite adding up to the losses (like the loss of life in Lebanon, etc.), but they are certainly a good sign. still, it's not like those Bushites and their Nazi gestapo tactics haven't been successful so far, so let's see how the press deals with Newt Gingrich calling the Republican's political oppostions "insurgents".

that's right. american citizens who disagree with the "policy" of starting WW3 are "insurgents". (see below blog.)

incidentally, my buddy told me that on all of those new police-drama shows like "24", "CSI" and the dozens of others, they're no longer reading us our rights when they arrest us. i clearly remember in the 80's and 90's watching tonnes of TV, and on all the cop shows whenever they arrested someone, they used to say: "you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law..." etc., etc.


they just say "shut up!" when a suspect complains, and often beat them to help shut them up. at this rate we'll soon forget we have rights, as too many of us have already... :(

anyway, enough of this stuff.

(oops, sorry, there's more.)

unfortunately since i know as much as i know i have to continue to try and stop it, but still it's not easy to be right about everything else (life, love, happiness, culture...) and yet still face opposition about this. the idiots in charge could just keep attacking countries until we feel the next fake "event" they pull off is logically justifiable, probably a small nuclear or biological weapon, and then they'll declare martial law and stick us in the Stadium (like the New Orleans Superdome) to starve us until we kill each other.

(sorry again, i was just covering the Prisoner's Justice Day protest at City Hall - this is the 31st Anniversary, and it was based on a prisoner dying at after he was in isolation and his "help" button was deliberately turned off. it was amazing display of 200 protestors watched by 100 cops, and there were even secret police there too: a couple of friends talked to them after they were pointed out by organizers, and they said impolitely and curtly "we're supporting whatever they're supporting". FYI - i've added notes from the talk i transcribed with a prison activist, and yes, this is more proof of an apartheid state with homeless people foraging for food in the urban wilderness of North America...)

we don't live in the world we think we live in, and that fantasy is catching up to us pretty fast. anyway, i've got to chop up some interviews i did, i'll see you soon...


p.s. oh yeah, WW3 has started, shitty...

Peace by pointing out the past made the present...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

[Ed note: the original contains LINKS to supporting articles, and there's a whole archive of fake terror, concentration camps, and all the other fun stuff they have planned for us at and as well.]

Terror Plot: How Long Before It Turns Into BS Like Every Other Example?

Prison Planet | August 10 2006

Government enforcers and frightened slaves are all hot and bothered about the latest supposed terror plot targeting UK flights inbound to the US. How long before the whole saga turns out to be hoaxed BS like EVERY SINGLE OTHER major terror alert there has been?

Ridiculous restrictions have been slapped on travelers, with mother's having to taste baby milk before they board planes and all hand luggage, including liquid drinks, being banned.

The new alert arrives with the 9/11 truth movement on the cusp of a wave of media exposure.

Evidence of government sponsored terror and how they use the fear of terror to control society is bursting out at the seams as editorials nationwide in the US are uniform in attempting to debunk research that questions the official version of 9/11.

Statistical analysis has proven that every time Blair and Bush sag in approval ratings, a fresh terror alert gives them a bounce back up the charts.

Every single major terror alert issued by either the US, Canadian or UK governments has proven to be either a manufactured facade, an entrapment sting or an outright hoax.

Recently, a supposed plan to hijack planes and fly them into London landmarks was exposed as a concoction of UK government lobbyists and news chiefs.

The July 2005 London bombings were a British intelligence operation. The alleged ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan, was working for MI5.

Here is a compendium list of other reports where the role of governments and security agencies in manufacturing artificial terror plots is exposed - within these stories are links to even more.

Seven Morons In A Warehouse

Sears Tower: US Government Creates Another Al-Qaeda Cell

Cooked Canary Wharf Terror Plot Recycled

Canadian 'Terror Plot' Begins To Unravel

Hyped Terror Raid Proves To Be Paper Tiger

Toledo Terrorists and Government Entrapment

Twenty-Three Intel Experts Say LA Terror Plot a Sham

Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot

NYC Subway "Plot": Just Another Fake Terror Alert









Wednesday, August 09, 2006

"Some have expressed concern over Newt Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency", while referring to Ned Lamont supporters in Connecticut." (Ta-daa!)

Here it is, ta-daa!

Fascism! :P

Y-ep, that's right, it's near, it's here, and it hates queers!

And anyone who disagrees with them fascistas is a lilly-livered queer "insurgent" terrorist scumbag who deserves to be put in camps and tortured until they see the light of day.

(Or maybe just leave 'em there to die, whatever...)

This is all classic incrementalism, just like the bird-flu crap they spring on us every few months - when it finally gets here we'll all be "smart" enough to say "See? I told you!"

Ye Olde Rapin' Rummy, the man (loosely defined) who sold Saddam bio-weapons also owns shares in Gilead, the company that makes Tamiflu, the alleged vaccine. He's already profited off the jump in stock price according to Forbes Magazine and CNN Money, among several others. (Google "rumsfeld tamiflu", or something like that.)

They even tried this crap back in the late 1970's with "pig flu", here's a bit of the BBC News breakin' it down...

"Previous small outbreaks of swine influenza proved false alarms. In 1986, a Dutch man suffered severe pneumonia after contracting a virus, and in 1977 a similar virus turned up in a handful of people in Fort Dix, New Jersey."


All of these potential "epidemics" or "pandemics" or "bullshitemics" of the 20th Century originate at U.S. military bases, and it's frequently soldiers who are experimented on until they produce the first victims - themselves. (Google "tuskeegee experiment", or talk to the millions of homeless Vietnam Veterans foraging for food in the urban wilderness of America.)

The U.S. military is a completely corrupted and compromised organization that hasn't had a point since WWII. Everything they've done since then has been a moral mistake meant to advance an evil imperial agenda - and here we are!

Their phenomenal propaganda machine has ensured that no one pays attention to how much money was spent building up the various war machines and tearing them down, and who loaned all that money to the governments involved:

He who controls the debt controls the debtor.

That's right, The Big Banks stole the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913, and then started all of these insane wars by funding the various combatants - who in turn advanced the agenda's of various corporations and still do today - ALL of them owned by The Big Banks. That's right. ALL of them.

After all, where do you or your company get and keep your money?

It's a giant scam, it's extortion, graft, bribery, murder, rape, theft, and everything else you can think of as ordered by the New World Order (Bush Sr.'s term used in a speech on September 11, 1991) and it's variant parties. Sure there's arguments within this giant pyramid scheme made by the various parties, but they're not the ones we make, and they're not the ones we hear.

People have been talking about this forever since it's been going on forever, and the more we dismiss people like former President John F. Kennedy and former war hero - the most decorated marine of his time - General Smedley Butler, the more trouble we'll be in.

The latter foiled the attempted Nazi-fascist coup against the social-democratic programs of President Roosevelt that he was asked to lead in 1933, and said:

Released September 11, 2001
The Wisdom Fund, P. O. Box 2723, Arlington, VA 22202
Website: -- Press Contact: Enver Masud

'War Is a Racket'

Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933 by General Smedley Darlington Butler, USMC. General Butler was the recipient of two Congressional Medals of Honor - one of only two Marines so honored.

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses...

There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.



So, cut it out.

Stop indulging in the economic and political nonsense being bandied about the mainstream media, it's just garbage meant to confuse us, and it's racist treatment of people overseas we never hear from or see has to stop before billions die - including us.

Billions of dollars are spent on justifications for objectively insane actions and consequences, and our talking heads and pundits act like our supposed "enemies" are faceless savages who want nothing more than to kill all of us - including apparently inventing all sorts of intricate geopolitical plots and schemes to work together to come and get us.

It's a lie. It's crap. All they want to do is chill out.

Everyone knows who's in charge, everyone's dealt with it for years, everyone knows they don't have the resources to start a fight, and everyone knows it sucks that the West won't help them. But, no one wants to pick a fight with the U.S., the U.K., Israel, or anyone else who can destroy them easily if they choose to - and nobody ever does.

Honestly, just like us, nobody cares.

Even all the tinpot dictators in the Middle-East are supported by the West - how the hell else are they in power? And why don't we see what the U.S. does with regimes it can't stand, like in Cuba, North Korea and formerly Iraq? Where's the embargoes?

The answer is there aren't any, and these puppets like all the others in the 20th Century are merely strung along until the U.S. wants to convince the public that they pose a threat, at which time the U.S. military gets another chance to practice sodomizing another country.

Basically, Daddy is teaching his 14 year old son how to rape his 6 year old son, and we're about to take on the role of the rapee.

Just like in hundreds of authoritarian regimes around the world, our intelligence agencies, cops and soldiers are being trained to hate and fear us, and they can't see the forest for the trees: once they're used up they'll be killed or jailed too, and replaced with a fresh crop of soldiers propagandized with no knowledge of the past.

That's why soldiers are more valuable than cops, they offer completely controlled young and impressionable minds, and can be tested, drugged and ordered completely at will to do just about anything.

(See: Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, Baghram, and the hundreds of others in the growing Secret Prison Industrial Complex.)

Or just ask the hundreds of cops fired in New Orleans.

Oh sure, many may have been corrupt enough as it is and allowed the looting and shooting to occur, but alas, they knew too much. So, they were simply let go in favour of soldiers who are stashed on bases and propagandized 24 hours a day by the army.

It's a beautiful system, since the local cops may live in your local neighborhood, have local friends, barbecue locally on the weekends and put their kids in local schools.

However, if you replace them with soldiers who have no local ties, and are either foreign troops or those returned home after being stationed overseas at any of the 700 U.S. military bases around the World, you can easily convince those soldiers to destroy that community in a way the police never would - and completely enslave the people they have absolutely no ties to. (See: The Rest Of The World.)

It's the classic Hitlerian "Night of the Long Knives" crap that even the most evil neo-con supporters have to be concerned about, and the way fascism works is a continual centralization of power, enslavement of people, and destruction of all free expression and thought until there are only a handful of scumbags left at the top running their toy soldiers like a videogame while laughing at their gullibility.

Then those at the top will just use a bioweapon kill everybody with their tight-knit cadre of personal private bodyguards and scientists, and chill out with some stem cells and virgin's blood to keep 'em young'n'fit. And that's that.

Anyway, we've got anywhere from 2 to 5 years before there is a total police state takeover of North America and Europe, and likely the rest of the World. It's happening all over the place, and the media's acceptance of the Republican's use of the word "insurgent" to describe anti-war dissenters is just the tip of the iceberg ramming into the unsinkable Titanic of Free Speech in America.


"Unsinkable", eh?

Progressive Daily Beacon /

Newt Gingrich Considers Political Opposition, American Citizens, to be an ''Insurgency''

A. Alexander / Progressive Daily Beacon | August 9 2006

Some have expressed concern over Newt Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency", while referring to Ned Lamont supporters in Connecticut. From a personal perspective, Gingrich was correct in obliquely referring to America's blogosphere and directly Lamont supporters, as being an "insurgency". Gingrich, of course, meant the term to be derogatory and a means of linking those that oppose Bush's war follies with terrorists. Still, Crazy Newt the serial divorcer was correct in more ways than he fully understands and, too, revealed the Neo-Conservative agenda in a clear and yet, unintended way.

That Gingrich would openly refer to those who oppose Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative madness as being an "insurgency" is, in a very real sense, the first public admission that the Bush regime and Republicans are at war with the American people. It is a blatant confession of the ultimate Neo-Conservative agenda, i.e. a deliberate and swift movement toward a very real Executive dictatorship wherein those who dissent or disagree are "the enemy" or members of an "insurgency". Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency" when referring to fellow Americans reveals in no uncertain terms the reality that the Neo-Cons recognize a movement forming that consists of the American people and that is designed to directly challenge their drive toward a nationalist imperialistic dictatorship.

Open and truly democratic governments don't view their political opponents as "enemies" whose opposition is looked upon as an "insurgency", and they certainly don't feel a need to be at war with the people they govern. For Gingrich, Bush, Republicans and the entire Neo-Conservative movement; however, the reality is that the American people are increasingly questioning their "right to rule" and are, therefore, considered enemies or, as Newt Gingrich more aptly said, an "insurgency".

The fact of the matter is that Newt Gingrich is right! There is no better way of defining and describing those American citizens who have formed and continue forming a direct and spirited opposition to the Neo-Conservatives' madness, as being anything other than an "insurgency". Bush and Republicans have busied themselves at the task of disregarding American laws; International laws; have committed war crimes; lied to the American people in order to engage in war with Iraq; unilaterally exempted themselves from the Constitution; committed treason by revealing an undercover CIA agent's name; undermined a free press; illegally spied upon American citizens; instituted a policy of merging church and state; stacked the courts with nefarious individuals that would knowingly and willingly support an Executive dictatorship; provided their crony pals with government appointments and large government contracts that have resulted in grotesque profits without services being provided; raped the nation's treasury; supported big oils' obscene profit taking at the expense of the American people; left New Orleans to rot and refused to help while more than 1,300 citizens perished, and through stygian deception refused to hold anyone to account.

Bush-Republican Neo-Conservatives have consolidated all the government's powers and have used that power as a tool to undermine America's democracy, to viciously assail any citizen who openly disagrees with their policies, and to cow their opposition. As such, the people have no effective systematic recourse or resources through which to oppose their government, other than through the formation of an internet "insurgency".

The Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative form of governance displays all the symptoms of tyranny and as such is deserving of being opposed in the most strenuous manner, including the formation of an internet-based political "insurgency". It is in fact the patriotic duty of every American citizen to directly confront and oppose the tyranny being imposed upon the United States of America by the Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative movement. Therefore, if Newt Gingrich wishes to expose once and for all, the fact that the Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative movement views the American people as their enemy and chooses to label the American people as being an "insurgency", he is correct in so doing!

What choice do the American people have, but to form an "insurgency" when the current government has consolidated its power in such a way that the people have no legal or Constitutional means through which to protect themselves and their civil liberties? If Gingrich chooses to label fellow Americans as "enemies" or being part of an "insurgency", I personally welcome his unintended honesty. If fighting for the American way of life, freedom, liberty, and the Constitution makes the blogosphere an "insurgency" the label should be worn with pride.


Peace by picking the propaganda out of my nose...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

A timeless, timely and terrific JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press (5 minutes on Google Video) from April 27, 1961

Google Video

JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press



Miller Center of Public Affairs - Scripps Library & Media Center

John F. Kennedy Speeches

"The President and the Press" (April 27, 1961)

Download Audio (mp3)

[Continued excerpt...]

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort, based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security-and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

That question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the Nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said-and your newspapers have constantly said-that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America-unions and businessmen and public officials at every level--will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to this same exacting test.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for, as a wise man once said: "An error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian law-maker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment--the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution--not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.


* JFK II: The Bush Connection *

(Bush Sr. helped kill John F. Kennedy when he secretly worked for the CIA. It's unbelievable, but I saw it, and now I believe it. The "official" evidence and testimony from those directly involved in the original investigation is overwhelming, and the conclusions are undeniable. A great film, and a great piece of the puzzle that helps explains how The Bush Crime Family have spent the last 50 years helping to ruin the world...)


Peace by proving powerful people paid the price to prove it...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Vanity Fair, The L.A. Times, The Village Voice, The New York Times, CSPAN and others are all trying to say 9/11 was an inside job.

The L.A. Times /

An indictment of Mr. Conspiracy

Some Internet sites say Oliver Stone's 'WTC' fails to address what really happened on 9/11.

LA Times | August 8, 2006

By Tina Daunt

Memo to Oliver Stone: Conspiracy theorists have a bone to pick with you.

The filmmaker's latest release, "World Trade Center," does not engage in any of the cloak-and-dagger mumblings that have made the rounds, particularly on the Internet, in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy. All this has conspiracy theorists very disappointed. They figured if anyone would be willing to — as they see it — challenge the "official" version of events, it would be Mr. "JFK" himself.

"Oliver Stone, having done 'Nixon' and 'JFK' and other movies that have been quite revealing, had a chance to use his power to ask a few very damning questions," said radio show host Jack Blood
, who is urging a boycott of the film. "Instead, what we have is an establishment movie that certainly condones and endorses the cover story that was given to us by the government on 9/11."

Stone has a simple answer: He wanted to tell the story of two Port Authority officers who tried to save lives that day but ended up fighting for their own. Politics wasn't involved.

Alex Jones, who has an Internet radio show on and
, said he doesn't fault Stone for making a movie that honors the heroes of 9/11. "He is allowed to make a movie about this microcosm that was such a big part of 9/11," said Jones. "We know that the police and firefighters were heroes, and I agree with that. But there is concern in the 9/11 truth community that the movie will be used to bolster the official story."

To be sure, there are plenty of alternate views on the events of 9/11.

Some believe the CIA was in on the attacks. Others wonder if bombs had been planted inside the towers. Still others think the U.S. government knew the attacks were coming but chose not to act. In March,
actor Charlie Sheen said in an interview with Jones that he too questions the "official 9/11 story."

"It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions." Sheen added: "There was a feeling, it just didn't look like any commercial jetliner I've flown on anytime in my life, and then when the buildings came down later on that day, I said to my brother, 'Call me insane, but did it sort of look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

Sheen also told Jones he wanted an independent investigation of the events leading up to 9/11. "It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families; we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Now with Stone in the mix, there's even more intrigue. Some theorists theorize: Maybe the director himself is part of the 9/11 plot.

"Was Stone used by the Illuminati as an unknowing pawn to whitewash the 9/11 conspiracy theories to the masses?" wondered blogger John Conner.
"Was he approached with the project and coerced into a commitment to occupy his time in attempts to thwart any other 9/11 angle from being used? Is Stone a pawn in the game? Perhaps Stone didn't know at the time, and found out too late. Perhaps production had begun, and he was already on board when he found the 9/11 rabbit hole."

The questions just add fodder to the debate.

"At some point you will see a Hollywood film that looks at alternative views of the official 9/11 story," said Jones. "It's just who's got the courage to do it."



The Village Voice /

Fakes on a Plane

Conspiracy buffs craft their own online WTC movies

Ed Halter / The Village Voice | August 8 2006

Editor's Note: This article wrongly refers to Alex Jones' latest feature film, Terrorstorm, as "Terror War". Terrorstorm can be downloaded and watched in full online at

Oliver Stone and Paramount are intent on getting out the message that World Trade Center doesn't traffic in fringy speculations about the 9-11 attacks—since the unabashedly liberal director's JFK (1991) stands as the most mainstream movie elaboration of conspiracy theory to date.
Paramount retained Creative Response Concepts—the same marketing firm responsible for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign and numerous other conservative causes—and Stone's talking point became "This is not a political film." (See J.Hoberman's review.) Studio reps screened portions of the film on Capitol Hill a few weeks ago in a preemptive strike against potential red-state congressional grumblers. And indeed, right-wing pundits have so far embraced the movie: "It is one of the greatest pro-American, pro-family, pro-male, flag-waving, God Bless America films you will ever see," Fox News' Cal Thomas gushed in his syndicated column.

But Stone's attempt at muffling his JFK rep has raised hackles within the burgeoning world of conspiracy theorists.
David Slesinger of—one of countless sites devoted to alternative explanations of the events of September 11—organized a "call to action" to his fellow "9-11 Truth activists."
Slesinger proposes staging nonviolent protests on the film's opening weekend by flyering and picketing "suburban mall theaters" that explicitly prohibit such activity, in hopes of garnering media attention through activist arrests., run by one "John Conner" (presumably self-styled after The Terminator's hero), denounces World Trade Center as "the biggest 9/11 whitewash in history."
Asks Conner: "Was Stone used by the Illuminati as an unknowing pawn to whitewash the 9/11 conspiracy theories to the masses?"
When lefty news aggregator the Raw Story posted a release linking to Slesinger and Conner, it drew so many readers that Conner's site temporarily crashed from bandwidth overload. Another site,, argues that advance clips from World Trade Center seem to include the sounds of bombs going off in the buildings. "Only when Oliver Stone's movie is rolled out nationwide," Prisonplanet writes, "will we be able to comb through it for more proof that Stone is clued in to the 9/11 truth movement and the complete fraud of the government fairy tale."

Thanks to this active online community, 9-11 Truth seekers don't need Stone to see their theories propounded in cinematic form. In the half-decade since 2001, as a loose congeries of varied political fringe groups and conspiracy hounds melded with a newly radicalized crop of Bush-burnt Americans to form a growing network of like-minded skeptics, the movement has fostered a robust filmmaking subculture of its own.
Nearly 20 feature-length videos have been circulating through its ranks, first on DVD, more recently for free through video services like Google and YouTube. Directors have become important figures within the movement. And the audience is out there—more than you might think. An oft quoted May 2006 Zogby poll found that 42 percent of Americans believed that "there has been a cover-up" about 9-11 on the part of the government and the 9-11 Commission.

With forthright titles like The Truth & Lies of 911, The Great Conspiracy, and September 11th the Con, the Conspiracy, the Cover-Up, these home-brewed affairs play like the audiovisual descendants of old self-published conspiracy books: cheaply made, but spiced with highly idiosyncratic, lurid aesthetics.
Their world-historical urgency is often endearingly undercut by an ill-lit, room-toned cable-access vibe, or the pasteboard rented-studio stiffness of a late-night infomercial. Their raison d'être, without exception, is the presentation of "evidence" that key parts of the standard narrative just don't "add up." The litany of examples changes, but is drawn from a common pool: The twin towers and nearby WTC 7 could only have fallen the way they did from a controlled demolition, key video messages from Osama bin Laden appear to portray a bin Laden impostor, no footage exists of a plane hitting the Pentagon, and so on. The conclusion, always, is that 9-11 was an "inside job." Though the skeptics don't agree on the perpetrators, most point to the Bush administration and neocon high-ups, and nobody seems to think Al Qaeda acted alone. On first viewing, some movies can be powerfully effective. For viewers already distrustful of Bush, they function as epistemological horror films, evoking fears that the state of the world may be even worse than it already is, due not to apparent hubris, negligence, and ineptitude, but rather a thrillingly brilliant cabal of evil elites: the perfect movie villains, and the inverse of the neocons' own terrorist demons.

A few conspiracy films include original interviews with witnesses (or more often, an echo chamber of fellow skeptics). The bulk of footage consists of the analysis of media artifacts found online: website pages of "buried" news stories, animated diagrams, tinny compressed video clips, and neo–Ken Burnsian digital zooms into pixelated photos. In this respect, these Truth movies feel like the birth of a documentary form uniquely native to the online culture: the DIY results of hours upon hours of Googling, blogging, and Photoshopping.

The most shoestring works, like Eric Hufschmid's Painful Deceptions, could barely be called movies, operating merely as multimedia slide shows with theorizing voiceover. Others, like BYU physicist Steven Jones's 9-11: Scientific and Ethical Questions, are little more than videotaped live PowerPoint presentations (though Jones's soft-spoken Midwestern timbre adds surprisingly powerful drama). The most extreme example of this info- centrism is 911 Stranger Then [sic] Fiction, in which a computer-generated voice reads scrolling text for two hours, occasionally interspersed with a flash of something grabbed from Google's image search. It's so sparsely experimental that one might mistake it for a work of video art. That is, until it begins railing against the "Zionist mafia"-—another unfortunate tendency of the genre.

Other directors have begun to uplift Truthie cinema. Austin, Texas, talk- radio host Alex Jones has pumped out a string of slicker productions, including Martial Law 9-11: Rise of the Police State, 911: The Road to Tyranny, and Police State III: Total Enslavement, in addition to earlier pre–9-11 videos about other conspiracies. A strident opponent of the "New World Order," Jones cuts a more Michael Moore–esque figure, inserting footage of himself "bullhorning" at protests, interviewing bystanders, and being subsequently harassed by police—and in his recent TerrorWar, briefly confronts Moore himself. Jones's preacherly theatrics have helped him rack up a few Hollywood connections. Charlie Sheen is an outspoken fan, and Jones has contributed animated cameos in Richard Linklater's films Waking Life and A Scanner Darkly.


22-year-old director Dylan Avery of Oneonta, New York, has emerged as the hot young star of the skeptic set with his 2005 'tude-filled feature Loose Change. Avery claims in a recent Vanity Fair profile that he's received over 50,000 orders for the Loose Change DVD and over 10 million viewings online, and says he's in talks with a number of studios to release an updated cut of the film on September 11, 2006. His name frequently pops up in Technorati's daily list of most searched-for keywords, and his MySpace profile boasts over 3,500 friends. By mainstream media standards, Loose Change remains ultra–low budget, but with Avery's casual, no-nonsense voiceover, tight editing, and hip-hop DJ'd score, it's by far the most accomplished and accessible example of 9-11 Truth cinema, though not free of the questionable fact-sourcing practiced by its peers (most egregious: "According to Wikipedia . . . ").

In true Internet fashion, Loose Change has even spawned a counter-video. Mark Iradian's Screw Loose Change takes on "911 deniers" by subtitling a running commentary over Avery's video, parrying and mocking his arguments as they unfold. William Lewis and Dave von Kleist's woefully titled 911 in Plane Site also generated a critique, Not in Plain Sight. In this case, the attack comes from within the movement: Not in Plain Sight's anonymous author claims that In Plane Site is so full of errors that it must be intentional disinformation created to mislead and discredit the movement. (Not in Plain Sight also includes the most wonderfully bizarre music of any of these works: looping, whoomping synth blurts that resemble discarded takes from the 1980 Flash Gordon soundtrack.)

Despite these limits, the 9-11 conspiracy docs will surely inspire further imitation, and their wiki-style muckraking is bound to dig up something important during an administration addicted to data-fudging and cover-ups. In a world that increasingly seems all fringe and no center, other radical and niche ideologies will undoubtedly embrace the no-holds-barred, blog-friendly, direct-to-YouTube format.
With any luck, we'll see a whole new batch three years from now, made by embittered, paranoid conservatives who have been voted out of power.


The New York Times /

NY Times Features Barrett's 9/11 Free Speech Fight

In the MediaA Skeptic on 9/11 Prompts Questions on Academic Freedom

By Gretchen Ruethling

The New York Times

August 1, 2006

The 9/11 skeptic-slamming Gray Lady of establishment journalism finally offers some cautious coverage of Kevin Barrett's 9/11 free speech battle in Wisconsin. Yes, they bounce blithely past Barrett's evidentiary case for US gov complicity and feebly try to associate him with Ward Churchill (to alienate 9/11 families?) and a Holocaust denier (to turn off everyone else?), but on the whole it's another useful little breakthrough moment exposing the inconvenient endurance of 9/11 truth. - Ed.

MADISON, Wis., July 26 — Sipping on a bottle of water and holding a book about the history and future of Islam, Kevin Barrett ticked off a few examples of what he saw as evidence that the Sept. 11 attacks had been an "inside job."

As children zoomed by on tricycles and shot basketballs at a community center near his home, Mr. Barrett, 47, described how some news orgainzations (the French daily newspaper Figaro and Radio France International, in fact) had reported that an agent from the Central Intelligence Agency visited with Osama bin Laden two months before the attacks. He also said fires could not have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers at free-fall speed, as reported by the special Sept. 11 commission.
"The 9/11 report will be universally reviled as a sham and a cover-up very soon," said Mr. Barrett, who has been a teacher's assistant or lecturer on Islam, African literature and other subjects at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, since 1996. "The 9/11 commission has its conspiracy theory, and we have ours."




9/11 and the NeoCon Agenda on CSPAN 1!

In the Media

Another breakthrough media moment! This weekend CSPAN 1, the main CSPAN channel, will broadcast a truly powerful panel discussion from the June American Scholars Symposium: "9/11 and the Neocon Agenda," and will air it three times in prime viewing slots.

Click graphic for more details.

This dynamic panel including Professor Steven Jones, Col. Robert Bowman, Professor James Fetzer, Webster Tarpley and Alex Jones, powerfully demolishes the government's official story of what happened on 9/11.

CSPAN's schedule now confirms that the L.A. panel discussion on 9/11 will be broadcast Saturday night, July 29, at 8:00 PM (EDT), 11:00PM (EDT), and Sunday, July 30 at 2:15 PM (EDT) .

Pass the word and crank up the VCRs... -- Courtesy of


Peace by paying attention to the press prepared to push back...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.