Thursday, November 16, 2006

DER PSYOP, MEIN FREUND: isn't training you to say mindless: "arrr, war... good! hulk... smash!" crap.

::: Help TerrorStorm Reach's Number One :::

DVD rankings zeitgeist for online consumers, give them a taste of 9/11 truth!

Prison Planet | November 15, 2006
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones

Terror Storm is gearing up for its final assault on the Amazon rankings after re-entering the top 25 last night! The Amazon charts are the equivalent of the New York Times bestseller list for DVD's and with your support we can reach an entirely new audience and give 9/11 truth a fresh lease of life.


Hi Dawg,

I totally agree, but the Democrats aren't promising us any forms of oversight or repeal, so we still have to push them, and learn from the people who know how. It's that simple, and we are more than ever, to quote the great Barbara Streisand, "People, people who need people, are the luckiest people, in the World..." ;-)

Peace, BK

heya [---]! :P

sorry dood, you're completely incorrect, but i accidentally just found you a t-shirt on michael savage's website anyway.

(see attached)

i don't mean to be mean, but we're running out of time, so...

i could take 100,000 words to say you're incorrect, and have, but let's just say you are dealing with habitual liars and torturers who blow stuff up and tell us brown guys did it so we go kill them, and never provide any proof or process for determining if any of this is true or any response is necessary. they are lying and running PSYOP's to get you to argue their case, and since they have no case, it's a good one.

the PSYOP isn't training you to say mindless: "arrr, war... good! hulk... smash!" crap.

they're smarter than that. that's their job.

we're not. it's not our job.

they are controlling both sides of the mass media debate to ensure the war will continue while we argue about temporal nonsense, and you'll ignore the hidden side i've researched for years and am now telling you, which is:



Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi
Jordanian Painted As Foreign Threat To Iraq's Stability

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 10, 2006; Page A01

"The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign."

"In a transcript of the meeting, Harvey said, "Our own focus on Zarqawi has enlarged his caricature, if you will -- made him more important than he really is, in some ways."

"The Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops (626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S. military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S. military term for propaganda work.

One internal briefing, produced by the U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, said that Kimmitt had concluded that, "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date."










anyway, if you still trust these guys to tell the truth when i'm telling you i haven't killed anyone and i've researched the hell ouf of this and swear they're lying, then it's 1936, i'm a jew, and you're a dude in small-town germany going "c'mon, what's so bad about hitler anyway? it's a sucky-sitch, but both sides have a point, so you should just relax and let the fuhrer do his thang homie!"

us jews haven't "beheaded" anyone on TV in a long, long, long time anyway, if that was even "real", and if that wasn't just faked by hiring some darkies who'd rather work than die, as is often the case with limited options we're giving them by never even trying to fix their country, and suppressing their oil production to keep prices high and gouge the public.

i'm afraid "beheadings" is stuck in your head as a paulovian response to crush logic and keep the war going, and the propaganda is creepy.

as for gandhi, he never lost 600,000+ people to carpet-bombing. plus they had no guns and he wasn't happy about, knowing it was "the blackest deed" in the history of British rule.

but historical interpretations can get fuzzy, so let's use some "the two sides are equally wrong" numbers and see what we get.

the vietnam war saw 58,000 American's killed and 2 - 3 million Vietnamese, a real "holocaust" kill-ratio of around 50 slopes per G.I.

now, it's 655,000 Iraqi's according to the British Medical Journal, obviously a conservative estimate also skipping future generations chock-full o' cancer and birth defects from D.U.

oh, and the other side?

around 3000 American soldiers.

it's a massive tragedy all-around, but c'mon, as you can see today with all the advances in technology: it's now a "super holocaust" kill-ratio of at least 200 ragheads per G.I., a vast improvement in the bodycount now totalling over 2.5 million iraqi's since 1990 for no good reason at all.

in the next 20 years of drone airplanes, bio and nuclear weapons which our Leaders of the Free World are dying to use, it could be even greater, and yes:

these are the people you are defending by arguing with me.

this madness needs to stop, not be artificially equivocated, and the information vacuum makes you forget common sense: we shouldn't be there at all, we know that by now, and we knew that 4 years ago.

what makes you think we're doing anything positive over there when you HAVEN'T HEARD OF ANY SIGNIFICANT RECONSTRUCTION EFFORTS IN 5 YEARS, and when unlike 1936, you've actually SEEN our CONCENTRATION CAMPS, mein freund?

as for mr. micro-credit, power to him and the people he's helping, i've heard of similar enterprises in india over the years and think they're a good thing from what little i know - UNLESS a good friend told me emphatically it was a scam after he'd researched it for years, in which case i'd listen.

however, the "nobel committee" gave kissinger a "peace" prize too, so their hands are plenty bloody, and as sy hersh says: "when he goes to sleep, i wonder, does he dream of dead and burned cambodian babies?"

our leaders are the most evil pricks in the world, and they're coming for us next dood.

seriously, that's why they're setting up the north american union and took away habeas corpus, so they can change more laws and create new departments to legally come get us and never tell anyone it ever happened ever again.

we're a few months away from "v for vendetta".

that's why millions are silently freaking out in the mainstream media vacuum of disinformation you consume to "equalize" the sides of this debate.

of course i know you want the war to end, but it's complicated, so let's judge the whole thing fairly, let's "support the troops" in their own depleted uranium poisoning and random brutalization of innocent people that will make them deranged psychopaths and serial killers (it's a hidden fact) when they get home, and as it continues into year 5 let's periodically check-in and go: "sure it's terrible, but so are beheadings, so maybe..."

they are the most evil people in the world.

exhibit a: The World

it's an accidental tragedy of history, but they are coming for "us" right now.

and if you think it's hyperbole then remember what they did to "them".

they actually did it. again. and again. and again.

and they're doing it now.

again. to us.

Peace, (NOW!!!)



Black Krishna Brand

MySpace -

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Stewart and Colbert show us they're lying and trying to dumb us down, to find out why and help Save The World, please Google for "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", "America: Freedom to Fascism" and "". Also, check the daily newswires at "" and "" -- and pass this info on to everybody -- NOW!!!

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

(Aw forget it, we lost.) FOX News - The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened"

O.J. Simpson speaks during an interview at the Fox News Channel in New York, in this file photo from July 25, 2000. Fox plans to broadcast a two-part interview with Simpson in which the former football star discusses the slayings of his former wife and her friend, for which he was acquitted. (AP Photo/Richard Drew-File)

Associated Press/Yahoo News!

O.J. Simpson to discuss killings

2 hours, 5 minutes ago

LOS ANGELES - Fox plans to broadcast an interview with O.J. Simpson in which the former football star discusses "how he would have committed" the slayings of his ex-wife and her friend, for which he was acquitted, the network said.

The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

Simpson has agreed to an "unrestricted" interview with book publisher Judith Regan, Fox said.

"O.J. Simpson, in his own words, tells for the first time how he would have committed the murders if he were the one responsible for the crimes," the network said in a statement. "In the two-part event, Simpson describes how he would have carried out the murders he has vehemently denied committing for over a decade."

The interview will air days before Simpson's new book, "If I Did It," goes on sale Nov. 30. The book, published by Regan, "hypothetically describes how the murders would have been committed."

In a video clip on the network's Web site, an off-screen interviewer says to Simpson, "You wrote 'I have never seen so much blood in my life.'"

"I don't think any two people could be murdered without everybody being covered in blood," Simpson responds.

Simpson, who now lives in Florida, was acquitted in a criminal trial of the 1994 killings of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson was later found liable in 1997 in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the Goldman family.

Messages left with Simpson and his attorney Yale Galanter were not immediately returned.

* Email Story
* IM Story
* Discuss
* Printable View



FOX NEWS INTERNAL MEMO: "Be On The Lookout For Any Statements From The Iraqi Insurgents...Thrilled At The Prospect Of A Dem Controlled Congress"

Source: Huffington Post

Huffington Post has obtained an internal Fox News memo written by the network's Vice President of news. The memo details Fox's game plan the day Democrats won control of both the Senate and the House.




Black Krishna Brand

MySpace -

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Stewart and Colbert show us they're lying and trying to dumb us down, to find out why and help Save The World, please Google for "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", "America: Freedom to Fascism" and "". Also, check the daily newswires at "" and "" -- and pass this info on to everybody -- NOW!!!

Gambling on People who need People.

Hi Folks,

I know I'm not allowed to do this, or "tell you something important", but that thinking is stupid, and a big reason we're nearing the point of no-return.

We've lost our minds in losing our trust in each other, and are playing perfectly into the "divide and conquor" mentality applied by the elite for thousands of years. Today they have more tools to sell it while we have more tools to beat it, and I'll be damned if I let us lose because our "gang-mentality" appreciation of "politics" makes it too "sensitive" a topic to discuss or understand: any dictator in history would love the hell out of our infighting and willful ignorance, and slavish loyalty to an obviously corrupt leadership on both sides of the spectrum.


There's so much bad stuff happening right now it's ridiculous, and we can't look to the people causing it or the media keeping us from understanding it for solutions. I know that if you're not fighting this you're not empowered, and have to think "everything will be fine soon" just to stay sane. But I'm afraid it's getting worse fast, and the more we lie to ourselves the more powerless we feel, though frankly our emotional stability is among the least of our pressing concerns.

I suggest checking the daily newswires at and for crucial and mostly mainstream news articles.

That's right: my favorite alternative news sites list hundreds of articles from mostly mainstream news sources for very good reasons, while adding their own analysis and giving hundreds of "whistleblowers" airtime and exposure: they are an endangered species who've already disappeared from our television screens.

The way the media works is very, very, very simple: if it's shocking and said "once", it's probably true; if it's shocking and "repeated over and over and over again until it's burned into your brain and friends who hardly ever watch or read the news are enthusiastically describing and parroting it", it's probably propaganda.

As a journalist, if I beg to work for weeks and weeks on an important story that exposes significant government or corporate corruption, of course they'll run it. Once. Then they'll never mention it again, and the rest of the corporate media will ignore it. There are good reporters out there, and they have a hell of a time doing their job.

In fact, their inability to cover "real" news often leads to journalists burning-out or selling-out, which is exactly what their corporate bosses want:

Weak critics or enthusiastic liars.


The Democrats barely campaigned and won thanks to the public's anger at the GOP, and yet them promising to do NOTHING even BEFORE the election is a bad sign. The public demanded the Republicans be held accountable and in-check, and Benedict Pelosi and others looking to "work together" after 6 years of being treated like dogs must be politically suicidal or totally controlled. It's the latter. Electronic voting ensures they can win if they promise to be ineffective, also guaranteeing them precious TV time unlike serious critics. Pelosi's pre-mature media coronation needs to end when Congress votes on a Speaker in January, with a healthy backlash from an awakened public.

Keep in mind no politician from any party Chairing any Committee or on TV is trustworthy: they are Chairing Committees and on TV to legalize corruption and sell lies to us.

The mid-terms had more e-voting fraud than ever, and with a media blackout and no "official" investigation despite 90% of Americans disapproving, this problem will worsen. The elite want us to accept this as "normal" from now on, allowing them to install candidates from both parties and keep us trapped in the false Left/Right paradigm. It's like ignoring "attempted murder" and saying "What's the problem? They didn't kill anybody!" (Yet) instead of putting the people responsible in jail. First of all they should be in jail for attempting to steal the elections; second of all they've already stolen the right to vote from 300 million sleepy sheeple.

Rumsfeld replaced by Bush Sr.'s former CIA Director is also a bad sign, and you have to understand that this is the same drug-running Iran-Contra crew of liars and war-profiteers from the 1980's, including James Baker now running Iraq for the oil companies.

The corporate media doesn't say that because these people make them rich.

The only way to win is to finally break the "racist and war-mongering myth" (Webster Tarpley) of the "War on Terror" that scares and solidifies Bush's base, allowing him to attack anybody based on vague threats and no proof: Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc. It's meant to dominate the 21st Century, and the plan is to scare us with both "terrorism" and "anti-terrorism", or with "the terrorists" and "our governments" response. As you can see, it's working. You can watch "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism" on Google Video to see all the DECLASSIFIED examples of Western governments doing this thanks to the good people at the NSA, CIA and other intelligence agencies, and how and why it's being done. It's the most important film in history, and if everyone sees it we'll stop this madness quickly.

We have even bigger problems with the drastic housing-market slowdown, and the U.S. dollar finally collapsing thanks to the greed of the privately owned Federal Reserve cabal printing money out of... nothing. You can watch the second most important film in history, "America: Freedom to Fascism" on Google Video for more about that colossal fraud, it's the source of 90% of the World's problems. The Fed is not even publishing their "M3" anymore, or the "total aggregate money supply", so we have no idea how much inflation to expect especially when countries start dumping their U.S. dollar reserves. A global recession is being forecast even in mainstream publications, and the elite supporting dictatorships and oligarchies in the Third World want to install one in America to maintain their control and attack the rest of the World.

To cut-off the money-supply fueling their growing police states, we need to have the courage and tenacity of the Spanish, and remember that half their country launched a series of general strikes after The Madrid Bombings, or "3/11", their 9/11-style "inside job/false-flag/total lie" event. And it worked! The Spanish government admitted their intelligence agency carried out the bombing, and then pulled their troops out of Iraq. That's why you never hear about "3/11" in all this "War on Terror" crap: it's the biggest example of the "people" beating it, and the corporate media doesn't want us to know that.

There are many solutions we need to implement immediately, including changing the way we think for the better, especially since most "people" would rather just get back to relaxing and enjoying their lives, myself included. This can't happen if we continue to ignore all the "laws" our corrupt governments are changing: it's ALL of them, and we have to wonder "why" as opposed to meekly accepting it. The myth of the 20th Century was "nationalism", which resulted in 500 million people enslaving another 6 billion for the first time in history. This is the final stage of the elites plan to rule the World, and another "year of fear" could finish us off.

People working on behalf of "people" analyzing "power" have done a tremendous job, and their tireless efforts need to be understood and appreciated. We know we don't listen to all the greatest religious and cultural and historical icons we've known, we know they'd be opposed to us endorsing the senseless slaughter and enslavment of billions, and we wouldn't dare talk half the nonsense we do if God dropped by for a cup of chai. As for God "saving us", a wise man once told me "God helps those who help themselves!", and I think he was right.

Corporations are soon taking away the internet and replacing it with the more restrictive and invasive "Internet 2", so we only have a few months to understand what millions of people are trying to tell us, a reasonable measure for paying attention in any sane World. The 5 corporations that control what we think have ignored or smeared the internet and independent media, and have too many people believing in killing "people" who hate "freedom" (that's just so stupid) instead.

We're also seriously on the verge of World War Three, and for over a year these idiots have talked about nuking Iran despite the fact that:

Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb
U.S. Intelligence Review Contrasts With Administration Statements

By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 2, 2005; Page A01

A major U.S. intelligence review has projected that Iran is about a decade away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, roughly doubling the previous estimate of five years, according to government sources with firsthand knowledge of the new analysis.


The biggest problem with being a "successful" member of the media is the corrupt paradox. Or, to put it bluntly: the more you lie the richer you get, unlike most professions. The $50 million estate left by the late ABC News anchor Peter Jennings can attest to that, as can Rush Limbaugh who sells "Club G'itmo" merchandise and "concentration camps" as "fun" for his $31 million a year salary:

Club G'itmo 4 Kids: Send your little jihadi to daycare in air-conditioned comfort! The food at Club G'itmo beats the taxpayer-provided lunches in the infidel's schools. Plus, we provide students with all the tools needed to worship the god of their choice, free of charge!

This is a big huge mess, and yet there are solutions.

However: to simply say "the media lies" is intellectually bankrupt nonsense.

After all: how much?

To finally replace the conjecture with the real: "Holy crap! The media tells us nothing we need to know!" empowering truth, I strongly recommend watching and promoting the brilliant film "Orwell Rolls in his Grave" by Robert Kane Pappas. Despite great timing and reviews in 2004, it was buried by the media while the unwittingly polarizing "Fahrenheit 9/11" was promoted, probably because it deals with the media's least favorite subject... itself. Former high-level journalists and producers from major networks and newspapers reveal hundreds of crucial insights as courageous whistleblowers, and expose that the most powerful lobby in Washington is... the media.

This whole genre of brilliant documentaries critical of the "system" as opposed to certain elements of it are often suppressed, and since any 2 minutes could fill a whole episode of 60 Minutes, and you may want to watch them more than once to take it all in. On my umpteenth viewing I noticed that "breaking news" is now just a talking head breathlessly announcing how their "investigative" team learned of some official pronouncement in advance. But they never challenge it. Basically a breaking story today is getting lucky enough to broadcast the official propaganda first, and getting us even more excited about the lies than we would have. Since that's the case, it's not a bad idea for increasingly secretive governments and corporations to leak a few stories either, and confuse the public on what "investigative journalism" is supposed to mean.

Orwell Rolls in his Grave (2004)



The Source of the Trouble

Pulitzer Prize winner Judith Miller’s series of exclusives about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - courtesy of the now-notorious Ahmad Chalabi - helped the New York Times keep up with the competition and the Bush administration bolster the case for war. How the very same talents that caused her to get the story also caused her to get it wrong.


Anyway, I'm in touch with a few thousand people so I hope you at least get in touch with a few dozen, as things start falling apart they'll probably thank you for it. Check out the truth for yourself, in a World chock-full of "official" lies it's like a glass of lemonade on a sunny day... :-)

Peace by peace...



Black Krishna Brand

MySpace -

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Stewart and Colbert show us they're lying and trying to dumb us down, to find out why and help Save The World, please Google for "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", "America: Freedom to Fascism" and "". Also, check the daily newswires at "" and "" -- and pass this info on to everybody -- NOW!!!

PDD-60 and 1990's GloBILLism: "A Nuclear Knife Aimed at America's Heart" (Joel M. Skousen)

A Nuclear Knife Aimed at America's Heart

Joel M. Skousen
March 25, 1999

In November 1997, President Clinton signed a top-secret Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-60) directing U.S. military commanders to abandon the time-honored nuclear deterrence of "launch on warning."

Ironically, this was done in the name of "increased deterrence." Every sensible American needs to understand why this reasoning is fraudulent at best and deadly at worst. First, some background.

The impetus to change U.S. strategic nuclear doctrine came on the heels of Clinton�s demand to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in early 1997 that they prepare to unilaterally reduce America�s nuclear warhead deployment to 2,500 in eager anticipation of the ratification of the START II disarmament treaty. This pact has yet to be ratified by the Russian Duma.

Gen. John Shalikashvili, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, responded that he couldn�t comply, since the U.S. military was still operating on a former Presidential Decision Directive of 1981 to prepare to "win a protracted nuclear war." A winning strategy couldn�t be implemented without the full contingent of current nuclear strategic warheads.

According to Craig Cerniello of Arms Control Today (November/December 1997 issue), "the administration viewed the 1981 guidelines as an anachronism of the Cold War. The notion that the United States still had to be prepared to fight and win a protracted nuclear war today seemed out of touch with reality, given the fact that it has been six years since the collapse of the Soviet Union."

Certainly, the apparent collapse of the Soviet Union is the linchpin in every argument pointing toward the relaxation of Western vigilance and accelerated disarmament. Indeed, it is the driving argument that is trumpeted constantly before Congress, U.S. military leaders, and the American people.

Almost everyone is buying it -- even most conservatives who should know better. However, the most savvy Soviet-watchers can point to a host of evidence indicating that the so-called "collapse" was engineered to disarm the West and garner billions in direct aid to assist Russia while inducing the West to take over the economic burden of the former satellite states.

But the most ominous evidence is found in defectors from Russia who tell the same story: Russia is cheating on all aspects of disarmament, and is siphoning off billions in Western aid money to modernize and deploy top-of-the-line new weapons systems aimed at taking down the U.S. military in one huge, decapitating nuclear strike.

Contrast this with the Clinton administration�s response. Incredibly, while still paying lip service to nuclear deterrence, Assistant Secretary of Defense Edward L. Warner III went before the Congress on March 31, 1998, and bragged about the litany of unilateral disarmament this administration has forced upon the U.S. military:

Warner noted the "success" the Clinton administration has had in recent years, which has:

# Eliminated our entire inventory of ground-launched non-strategic nuclear weapons (nuclear artillery and Lance surface-to-surface missiles).

# Removed all nonstrategic nuclear weapons on a day-to-day basis from surface ships, attack submarines, and land-based naval aircraft bases.

# Removed our strategic bombers from alert.

# Stood down the Minuteman II ICBMs scheduled for deactivation under Start I.

# Terminated the mobile Peacekeeper and mobile small ICBM programs.

# Terminated the SCRAM-II nuclear short-range attack missile.

In January 1992, the second Presidential Nuclear Initiative took further steps which included:

# Limiting B-2 production to 20 bombers.

# Canceling the entire small ICBM program.

# Ceasing production of W-88 Trident SLBM (submarine-launched missile) warheads.

# Halting purchases of advanced cruise missiles.

# Stopping new production of Peacekeeper missiles (our biggest MIRV-warhead ICBM).

"As a result of these significant changes, the U.S. nuclear stockpile has decreased by more than 50 percent," Warner enthused.

All of this has been done without any meaningful disarmament by the Russians.

The Clinton administration would counter this charge by citing the "successful" dismantling of 3,300 strategic nuclear warheads by Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus, and the destruction of their 252 ICBMs and related silos -- all paid for with U.S. taxpayer funds to the tune of $300 million per year. But the real story is otherwise.

Yes, Americans paid for the dismantling of these systems -- the oldest and most out-of-date in the Soviet inventory. They were scheduled for replacement anyway, so the U.S. taxpayer ended up saving the Russians over a billion dollars, allowing them to use this and other Western aid to develop and build new systems, coming on line right now. But that isn�t all.

What the administration doesn�t say is that they allowed the Russians to reclaim all the nuclear warheads, and paid them to recycle the usable material into new, updated warheads. We didn�t diminish the threat at all. We only helped them to transform it into something more dangerous.

Thus, the Russians still maintain a more than 3-to-1 advantage over the United States in both throw-weight and nuclear delivery vehicles. That disparity is widening dramatically with the Clinton administration�s unilateral disarmament while at the same time encouraging the Russians to proceed not only with the deployment of 500 new Topol-M missiles (which are mobile-launched and therefore difficult to target), but to put three MIRVed warheads on each missile instead of the treaty limit of one warhead -- for a total deployment of 1,500 warheads.

Not counting the presumed minimum 4,000 to 6,000 warheads in the current Russian inventory, these 1,500 new warheads would overwhelm a measly 200-interceptor ABM system in North Dakota -- which the Clinton administration is insisting should NOT be deployed before 2005. I wonder why?

With our 50 Peacekeeper ICBMs scheduled to be decommissioned in 2003, that gives the Russians or Chinese a wide-open window for attack, should they choose to exercise their first-strike, nuclear-decapitation option.

So much for the "new realism" of the Clinton disarmament team and their assertion that Russia poses no threat. Judging strictly by public data from establishment sources (which is always understated due to Moscow�s heavy shroud of secrecy) the Russian threat is much greater than it ever was, both in quantity and quality of strategic nuclear forces. This is thanks, in part, to ongoing technology transfers by IBM and other defense contractors with the knowing participation and encouragement of this administration.

Now let�s take a close look at this presumed "increased deterrence" the Clinton Department of Defense is promising. The administration claims its brand of deterrence is still based on the "mutual assured destruction" (MAD) concept -- a truly appropriate acronym.

This is the presumption that, since both sides have an overwhelming capability to destroy each other, that no sane leadership would engage in nuclear war. Let�s examine this closely. MAD could only stand as a viable assumption if:

# Both sides had sufficient weapons and delivery vehicles to inflict total devastation.

# Neither side had an effective anti-ballistic-missile system.

# Neither side had electronic jamming capability on its incoming ICBMs.

# Neither side had hardened shelters protecting its population and leadership.

These assumptions clearly do not exist today:

First, we barely have enough nuclear warheads to take out the Russian arsenal as presently constituted if we used them all at once (which no sane military commander could afford to do, leaving him with no reserves). Russia, on the other hand, has enough to devastate our entire strategic forces and still retain 60 percent of her weapons in reserve, for a prolonged conflict.

Second, we have no ABM system to protect against ICBMs at all. Our dumbed-down and slowed-down Patriots are theater weapons (built to conform to the flawed ABM Treaty) and can barely catch slow, low-flying Scud missiles, let alone ICBMs that coming screaming in from space at 6 to 12 kilometers per second. The Russians have (in violation of the same ABM Treaty) a nationwide system of ABMs tied to phased-array radars and satellite guidance systems.

Third, we have no electronic jamming on our missiles to help them penetrate the Russian ABM system, and the Russians claim their newest Topol-M missiles do have such a capability. Whether or not this claim is a bluff is immaterial. The fact is, they are building new, high-tech missiles and our technology is 10 years old and stagnant. We are not developing or building anything new. This aspect can only worsen as time goes on.

Fourth, our civilian population is totally unprotected, while a large portion of the Russian cities have public fallout shelter facilities. New bunkers are being constructed for the Russian leadership despite the economic hardships the people suffer. This should tell us something about Russian leadership intentions.

Is this Mutually Assured Destruction? Hardly. It equates to United States Assured Destruction! In every category of deterrence, we are disarming and stagnant, and the Russians are building and deploying. There is, in fact, only one type of deterrence that is capable of somewhat balancing the scales: the nuclear response doctrine of Launch on Warning.

Launch on Warning takes advantage of the fact that long-range ballistic missiles take time to arrive on target -- up to 25 minutes, depending on where the missiles are fired from. If the Russians were to launch a first strike, our satellites would detect and confirm that launch within seconds. In a Launch on Warning doctrine, our missiles (if on alert status) could be launched before the Russian or Chinese missiles hit our silos. There is also time to retarget our missiles so that they are not wasted on Russian silos that are now empty.

Thus, one of the great advantages for a Launch on Warning doctrine is that it allows the nation that launches second to have an advantage over the nation that launches first. The one to launch first wastes a certain number of its missiles on our silos that are now empty. By contrast, our missiles (utilizing real-time targeting data from satellites) strike targets that are still viable.

Now that is deterrence -- a deterrence that we presently do not have due to PDD-60.

Clinton national security aide Robert Bell proudly proclaimed to a group of disarmament advocates, "In this PDD, we direct our military forces to continue to posture themselves in such a way as to not rely on Launch on Warning -- to be able to absorb a nuclear strike and still have enough force surviving to constitute credible deterrence."

This is patently preposterous. Respond with what?

We have no mobile missiles to avoid being targeted. We have already unilaterally agreed to keep over half of our ballistic missile submarines in port at any one time, so they can easily be targeted. After all, we don�t want our Russian "allies" to feel insecure!

All of our Navy and Air Force strategic forces are incapable of withstanding a nuclear strike. Even the remaining Trident subs on patrol would be unable to respond when communication links and satellites are downed in a first strike.

PDD-60 removes all alternate submarine launch codes so that our subs cannot fire without direct communication with the president. Those vital communications links will assuredly not survive a massive first strike. When you tell the Russians we are going to absorb a first strike, you induce them to make sure they hit us with everything necessary to make sure we cannot respond.

This is not deterrence. This is suicide.

Joel M. Skousen is a political scientist by training and former chairman of the Conservative National Commitee. He is a specialist in security matters and consults nationwide on "Strategic Relocation" -- the title of his latest book. Visit his web site here.


Google Search: pdd 60

Results 1 - 10 of about 937,000 for pdd 60. (0.12 seconds)

The U.S. Presidental Decision Directive 60
The top secret Presidential Decision Directive PDD-60, signed by President Clinton in November 1997, replaces a directive signed by President Reagan in 1981 ... - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

A Nuclear Knife Aimed at America’s Heart
In November 1997, President Clinton signed a top-secret Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-60) directing U.S. military commanders to abandon the ... - 32k - Cached - Similar pages

Presidential Directives Endanger Americans
PDD 25 and PDD 60 are classified and the exact texts have not been made available even when requested by members of Congress, but from the "summary" of each ... - 6k - Cached - Similar pages

PDD 60 article - US Strategic Nuclear Doctrine
PDD 60 article. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Doctrine ... The new presidential decision directive (PDD), details of which were first reported in The Washington ... - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

PDD/NSC 60 - Nuclear Weapons Employment Policy Guidance
[Presidential Decision Directives - PDD]. PDD/NSC 60 Nuclear Weapons Employment Policy Guidance. November 1997. NOTE: the actual text of this document is ... - 5k - Cached - Similar pages

Global Beat: Miscalculated Ambiguity: U.S. Policy on the Use and ...
Two months earlier, the Washington Post broke the news of the new guidance, reporting that PDD 60 requires "general planning for potential nuclear strikes ... - 25k - Cached - Similar pages

The NPT Review - Last Chance?
As if this U.S. stance were not threat enough, PDD 60 also includes other provocative ... To our nation’s shame, the 1997 PDD 60 embodies their success. ... - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

NTI: WMD 411 - Chronology 1997
Nov 1997 [N] U.S. President Clinton signs Presidential Decision Directive 60 (PDD 60) on U.S. nuclear warfare policy. Under the directive, the U.S. military ... - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

[PDF] Western States Legal Foundation
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Although PDD-60 itself was secret, its existence and general focus were reported in the media. ... Presidential Decision Directive-60 (PDD-60), signed ... - Similar pages

Welcome to Adobe GoLive 5
Presidential Decision Directive-60 (PDD-60), signed by President ... PDD-60 also contemplates nuclear retaliation against chemical or biological weapons. ... - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

Result Page:



Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Plan BK: The Solutions - Gamble Until Checkmate.

Hi Folks,

In the 10 years before The American Revolution, "Committees of Correspondence" were formed where citizens shared concerns about the growing tyranny of the British Empire, and became the basis for throwing off the yoke of oppression. In the 10 months before corporations completely control the internet and lie to launch the restrictive "Internet 2", we have to counter the pressures of a busy World where our social circles homogenize and shrink with age and responsibility, and where our impressions of potential friends and enemies are largely formed by the corporate media on behalf of war-mongering fascists.

If we defend our "Rights" the way we defend our "Opinions", then we can have all the opinions we want: the system is designed that way, with the First Amendment of the trend-setting U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights helping protect "free speech" around the World. Our focus on "defending" freedom has been perverted into "attacking" freedom by deliberately infused tribalism sold to us by the corporate media, who get us to condemn things we don't have to while ignoring things we should as part of our socially assigned "gangs".

We have to establish for a fact that the bad guys who destroyed our earning power and standards of living are controlling these false debates, and their evil plans are worse than we could possibly imagine. Facing the truth will allow us to engage a "common enemy" once and for all, which is exactly how the elite look at "us". They've even written many of their psychotic ideas down in racist and genocidal musings, including the Big Pharma "population reduction" and "medical experiments" alluded to in Oscar-winning films like 2005's "The Constant Gardner", among hundreds of other examples of the insane fantasies of the elite.

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography
by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin

Chapter III - Race Hygiene: Three Bush Family Alliances

"The [government] must put the most modern medical means in the service of this knowledge.... Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children.... The prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over a period of only 600 years, would ... free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune."

"The per capita income gap between the developed and the developing countries is increasing, in large part the result of higher birth rates in the poorer countries.... Famine in India, unwanted babies in the United States, poverty that seemed to form an unbreakable chain for millions of people--how should we tackle these problems?.... It is quite clear that one of the major challenges of the 1970s ... will be to curb the world's fertility."

These two quotations are alike in their mock show of concern for human suffering, and in their cynical remedy for it: Big Brother must prevent the "unworthy"' or "unwanted" people from living.

Let us now further inquire into the family background of our President, so as to help illustrate how the second quoted author, George Bush [Sr.] came to share the outlook of the first, Adolf Hitler.


1. Phyllis Tilson Piotrow, World Population Crisis: The United States Response (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1973), "Forward" by George H.W. Bush, pp. vii-viii.

2.Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971), p. 404.


Congressman: American Concentration Camps "On The Books"
Texas Representative urges repeal of neo-fascist laws in America before it is too late

Steve Watson
Monday, November 13, 2006

Re-elected Texas Republican Congressman Ron Paul joined Alex Jones on air last week to discuss the fallout of the midterm elections and what he sees transpiring over the next two years. He ended by ominously warning that if something is not done soon to overturn legislation such as the Military Commissions act, the law officially allows for citizen concentration camp facilities.



You can see as evidence the case of the "Third World", who don't like coming in "Third" and aren't sure why they're never in the race. Despite the trillions in IMF loans smoothly cycled through their economies and back to Western corporations, the Third World has been left with nothing but crushing debts and corrupt dictatorships and oligarchies all heavily armed and politically and financially supported by Western governments. The Third World cell-blocks of the global "prison planet" have been completed: we're supposed to be next, and that's what this "War on Terror" nonsense is meant to scare us into.

Gates not expected to alter war on terror

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 (UPI) -- Pentagon officials have said U.S. Defense Secretary-designate Robert Gates is not expected to reverse military and terrorism decisions made by Donald Rumsfeld.



The mainstream media is just like many other organizations: it’s composed of mostly good people put into bad situations by bad people. Kind of like Guantanamo. They have hierarchies and cultures defined against the mostly cosmetic differences they have with their peers or competitors, and with their platforms of self-promotion can artificially inflate their own importance. Many good people are "just doing their job" as directed, absent any extra effort or creativity that could be perceived as "bias" or "editorial", or asking questions that could make them seem "crazy" or not "credible" in a respected and clique-y industry. It's too bad, but since they never ask about this stuff many journalists don't know about "Operation Mockingbird", the CIA's plan to infiltrate and control the media which is still in place today. Handsome and well-traveled reporter Anderson Cooper even works there, and his CIA training while attending Yale was confirmed by CNN to Radar Online magazine.

Radar Exclusive
Anderson Cooper's CIA Secret

Anderson Cooper has long traded on his biography, carving a niche for himself as the most human of news anchors. But there's one aspect of his past that the silver-haired CNN star has never made public: the months he spent training for a career with the Central Intelligence Agency.



Operation Mockingbird
The Secret History of the CIA by Joseph J. Trento

"...One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman) these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.



Every intelligence agency does this, and if you watch "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", you'll see former M1-5 (the British FBI) agent David Shayler discuss how his book with partner Annie Machon, "Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers", recently exposed two "journalists" working for the Sunday Telegraph newspaper were secretly M1-6 (the British CIA) agents, and forced them to resign.

Protecting the dirty secrets of the corporate-government relationship has always been the media's main job, and that’s why ownership rules have been lifted: in 1982 people were outraged that only “50” companies owned the mainstream media; now they’re indifferent about “5”. A plan was launched in America 40 years ago by wealthy "conservatives" (really "globalists") like Joseph Coors and Richard Mellon Scaife to dominate the Republican Party and subvert the Constitution to further this aim. They created "Think Tanks" like "The Heritage Foundation" to train "liars" posing as "experts", who relentlessly repeat baseless charges of "liberal bias" based on the possible personal preferences of some reporters, and despite the fact that most have as much editorial control over the content of their news organizations as fast-food employees do over the content of their McDonald's. The myth is maintained because it helps the wealthy dishonestly attack their critics, and promote policies that make them richer while robbing the unwitting middle-class and poor. It is echoed largely unchallenged by the media owned by 5 corporations, but as anyone can see even "establishment liberals" can't get on TV anymore: after calling him "The most important intellectual of the 20th Century", the AOL/Time Warner owned TIME Magazine somehow lost Noam Chomsky's phone number.

The news is increasingly afraid to call something morally "wrong" when dealing with "official" statements or actions, allowing "officials" to "officially" say or do or justify anything they want while destroying the public's sense of appropriate moral outrage. As the elite brainwash us and change enough laws and institutional practices to implement full-blown fascism, the public who refuse to kick their addiction to the mainstream news will become totally ignorant and powerless. We've been fooled into celebrating or condemning nonsense, and are kept paranoid by being emotionally exhausted and intellectually distracted from the "real" issues in an increasingly dangerous World.

Peer pressure ensures journalists deal with specific issues in specific ways, and the many blindly defending what they choose to ignore is really just self-defense: it helps them justify lying and not trying. Not being "allowed" to cover "real" news often leads to burning-out or selling-out, fulfilling the chief goals of their corporate bosses: weak critics or enthusiastic liars. The mass media’s overall affected arrogance is a vain attempt to bolster their faltering credibility in an awakened online World, and while news divisions are scared of losing their entire audiences, the corporations who own them don't mind taking a $10 million hit on their disappearing nightly audiences in exchange for the $10 billion in oil profits they secretly cleared.

And of course, the sales of old TV on DVD.

Those "waking up" must do a lot more "speaking up", as angry demands for viewer-loyalty by fascist broadcasters emulating "Fox News" and “right-wing radio” tactics galvanize and frighten the ignorant masses, and artificially harden opinions against the alleged but never investigated lies of the independent media and other fake enemies of the public trust. The burdens of proof offered and accepted by the corporate media and their fans is a thinner gruel of "simple-speak" than any serious "conspiracy theorist" can afford to serve anyone, least of all their peers. The recognition of the true dangers we face and the need to work harder for credibility leads to most of us working harder for credibility, and a staggering amount of work is being produced that can bring everyone else up to speed if it’s seen and respected.

The powers of propaganda make the corporate media exceptionally dangerous in a World where we've learned to accept the simplest reasons for killing people; and reserve the "Right" to avoid thinking about it. This paradox should encourage more murder over the coming "100 years" or "Long War" the elite are preparing us for, and before the institutions that can implement or stop it are completely bribed or brainwashed, we need to expose it for a fraud.

The rise of anything-goes "public relations" means anyone pitching anything from anywhere is good business, including "experts" secretly or publicly paid for their punditry or speaking engagements based on the "face-time" they can get on network television. They are often sponsored by the same corporations who make their most trusted liars our most trusted media stars, leading to a parasitic relationship. You've got to feel bad for the decent people trapped inside this morally shaky house of cards: to get rich they have to become confidently, charismatically and criminally negligent, and it can work fantastically as the $50 million estate left by the late ABC News anchor Peter Jennings proves. One can only hope journalists are using their talent as whistleblowers in some fashion, perhaps grabbing aliases and helping to deconstruct the brainwashing they are supporting for the benefit of the public and independent media.

ABC anchor leaves estate of $50m

US news anchor for ABC, Peter Jennings, who died of lung cancer in August, left an estate valued at more than $50m (£28.5m) in his will.


To say "the media lies" is intellectually bankrupt nonsense.

After all: how much?

To finally replace the conjecture with the real: "Holy crap! The media tells us nothing we need to know!" empowering truth, I strongly recommend watching and promoting the brilliant film "Orwell Rolls in his Grave" by Robert Kane Pappas. Despite great timing and reviews in 2004, it was buried by the media while the unwittingly polarizing "Fahrenheit 9/11" was promoted, probably because it deals with the media's least favorite subject… itself. Former high-level journalists and producers from major networks and newspapers reveal hundreds of crucial insights as courageous whistleblowers, and expose that the most powerful lobby in Washington is… the media.

This whole genre of brilliant documentaries critical of the "system" as opposed to certain elements of it are often suppressed, and since any 2 minutes could fill a whole episode of 60 Minutes, and you may want to watch them more than once to take it all in. On my umpteenth viewing I noticed that "breaking news" is now just a talking head breathlessly announcing how their "investigative" team learned of some official pronouncement in advance. But they never challenge it. Basically a breaking story today is getting lucky enough to broadcast the official propaganda first, and getting us even more excited about the lies than we would have. Since that's the case, it's not a bad idea for increasingly secretive governments and corporations to leak a few stories either, and confuse the public on what "investigative journalism" is supposed to mean.

Orwell Rolls in his Grave (2004)



The Source of the Trouble

Pulitzer Prize winner Judith Miller’s series of exclusives about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - courtesy of the now-notorious Ahmad Chalabi - helped the New York Times keep up with the competition and the Bush administration bolster the case for war. How the very same talents that caused her to get the story also caused her to get it wrong.



Like a lot of good ideas, neither the "media" nor the "conservatives" are what they were meant to be, and corporations have been especially focused on destroying their original value-systems. Once we figure out how complete the corruption of our preferred "gangs" and “mainstream news” sources are, which shouldn't take long since "Orwell Rolls in his Grave" is about 1 hour and 45 minutes, we can see the elite are infinitely more dangerous to us than we are to each other. Once we establish that "we" are inherently more trustworthy than "them" and their salesmen on television, we can safely gamble on the questions we decide to ask as individuals that could benefit the entire World. Whether the questions are considered good or bad or sane or crazy depends on the familiarity with the subjects introduced, and as long as they are focused on the fascists they should be respected: because the fascists are crazy. The existence and expansion of "G’itmo" and the "Club G'itmo" T-shirts and merchandise for sale on Rush Limbaugh's website means they are capable of anything, including selling their fascist followers that "concentration camps" are "fun".

Club G'itmo 4 Kids!

Send your little jihadi to daycare in air-conditioned comfort! The food at Club G'itmo beats the taxpayer-provided lunches in the infidel's schools. Plus, we provide students with all the tools needed to worship the god of their choice, free of charge!


The global elite are playing "chess" with their "boiling frog effect", and using a series of carefully calculated moves to divide us, weaken us, dumb us down, and distract us from their true intentions. To win we have to play "chess" back by announcing what their plans might be, and anticipating and cutting off the moves they are planning on making. While cynics will attack us for what "doesn't" happen after we say it will, they need to realize that a big reason it "doesn't" is because we are making sure enough people know who should really get the blame if something blows up. Remember: these neo-fascist idiots were talking about being attacked by "terrorists" on a regular basis, so while we're not out of the woods yet, our “anti-terror taskforce” is certainly having a positive effect.

If you're not prepared to fight and want to remain sane in the World we live in, I understand that you have to have skepticism over how bad the situation is and a generic optimism: what choice do you have? Much like cheering for Kerry in '04, Pelosi in '06, and Clinton in '08, you're going to have to believe one of these fascist puppets will save us despite having no evidence to support that conclusion. It's a dangerous and willful blindness, and to seriously deny the critics of these war-mongering savages is categorically nuts. If you’re not in the game you’re not in control, a less-empowering position, and if you’re expecting “G-d” to save you then you’re forgetting one of his favorite sayings: “G-d helps those who help themselves!”

Besides, leave Him alone, He just got “Lost” on DVD and is dying to know what all the fuss is about.

For years the elite have been fomenting infighting based on the alleged "credibility" of peers within various groups opposed to them. However, with the massive amounts of evidence most deep-researchers can present thanks to the advances in technology, including priceless documentaries which organize their work into comprehensive narratives for a semi-literate public, we need to accept and gamble on the value of all the warnings and evidence coming from fellow citizens attacking the "establishment". As long as their claims are represented by peers, persistence and proof, and are aimed at the fascists and not at each other, we have to refuse to adopt our natural cynicism, and accept and promote as many possibilities as possible to counter their attacks on every facet of our society - the majority of which we don't have time to investigate.

It doesn't matter if someone is "wrong" or “mistaken” as long as their views don't attack any peers or keep movements from moving forward, and we can sort the mess out later when we have formal investigations. This policy ensures that nice guys finish first, and can help minimize the impact of government snitches sent to disrupt peaceful assembly. In an “open source” environment, anyone suppressing anyone else can be quickly identified and dealt with, hopefully constructively. As Mahatma Gandhi remarked to a follower who asked him what to do about government agents in their midst, he calmly replied: “Tell them everything.”

Though it's a force of habit, if any of us knows anything more than common-knowledge about anything at all, and all of us do, we have to avoid hypocritically using mainstream justifications to deny the value of the investigations of others as a part of rebuilding trust. While we all act like “experts” at times, we also all reflexively cheat towards "mainstream opinion" when ignorant and fearful of accepting something new or controversial, acting just like the people we get frustrated trying to reach. Even informal discussions with friends and family are tough when you aren’t “believed” despite obviously having looked into a given issue more, something that we’ve greatly suffered from over the last 6 years of internal “Red/Blue” state polarization, another brilliant “divide and conquer” tactic. Perhaps pointing out that attacking people on their knowledge of their “job” is just as silly as being attacked for your research, or perhaps even less so since they often haven’t “studied” their job.

We have to look deeper at issues than the leading pundits on the "Left" or "Right" encourage us to, and realize they are only "leading" because they work for corporate interests who sell them as our "leaders", and represent the same controlled-dissent conditions we’d encounter in their shoes. I wouldn't write them all off though, as many use their resources and intelligence to do a decent job of pointing us in the right direction: Noam Chomsky convinced me that Western governments and corporations are hypocritical and brainwashing mass-murderers; and Alex Jones showed me “why”. If we're smart we can build on the body of evidence put forth by everyone from Arundhati to Oprah, and look closer at the issue than they are allowed to until we see the moves being made that can mobilize entire communities.

Stopping the expensive and dangerous anti-terror "drills" that could go "live" as the brilliant Webster Tarpley enthusiastically endorses is key, and many cities have successfully shut them down. In a World of "official" lies we need to gain confidence in our collective worth by promoting our collective intelligence to each other, condemning the failures of our establishment "experts", and using our respective specializations to help chase their evil plans around the chessboard until we say checkmate before they do. Or, if that metaphor bricked, perhaps it's more like roulette, and the more numbers we place our bets on the better odds we have of winning.




STOP - ?

TARPLEY U: Join the Fightin' Tarpologists!

Audio and Video Links:

* mp3 download 911 interview pt1
* mp3 download 911 interview pt2
* Transcript of Guns and Butter Interview


All of this aiming-blame at each other needs to stop for our own safety, and to avoid the domestic police state being set up while we're busy arguing with people or ideas that represent - at worst - a fraction of the danger we're in.

We also have to be concerned about the poor young men and women from the "poverty draft" who make up the troops: the rich chicken-hawks who lied them into the Middle-East don't care about us, and don't care about them either here or there. They have been demoralized by pointless and immoral missions, with no clear objectives and no serious reconstruction efforts to win the "hearts and minds" of the people. They are in serious emotional and physical trouble, many are mentally or physically ill, some have committed suicide, and right now most have pulled back to Baghdad in retreat. They could be encircled and wiped-out especially if Iran is attacked, the totally unprovoked nuclear bombing pushing millions of Iranians into attacking American troops. This could also be part of a neo-fascist plan to destroy any local National Guard units who may resist a martial law takeover, which is probably among the biggest reasons they were created.

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

- The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

The Iraqi "people" or "insurgency" is rising in strength after over 600,000 have been killed (British Medical Journal), and with millions more possibly sickened for generations by depleted uranium causing cancer and birth defects, they have nothing left to lose by fighting the illegal occupation and theft of their land. Everyone is being screwed by the old story of the most powerful military the World has ever seen deliberately waging a failing war to: secure the drug trade, addict the troops, demoralize Americans at home, enrich defense contractors, enrich oil companies, increase Pentagon budgets, and enable tons of other corruption. Veterans benefits are being cut and denied, and all the money wasted on "Support The Troops" propaganda and signs should really go to… well, the troops.

The American Gulf War Veterans Association (AGWVA) was established with one goal in mind: To obtain treatment for those service members and their families who experience symptoms collectively known as the "Gulf War Illness". However, there is more to this issue than meets the eye.



What you don't know about your government could kill you...

Department of Defense documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act expose the horrific underworld of the disposable army mentality and the government funded experimentation upon US citizens conducted without their knowledge or consent.

Chemical & Biological Exposures
Radioactive Poisoning
Mind Control Projects
Experimental Vaccines
Gulf War Illness
Depleted Uranium (DU)


The absence of the "war" on TV means it could easily be far worse than Vietnam, and based on the "torture" that's been "officially" sanctioned and echoed in our pop-culture, it probably is. All the Pentagon reports of "sectarian violence" are told by proven Pentagon liars who've promised "cyber attacks" on "bloggers" and other sources of "disinformation", or anyone else who disagrees with the claims of nobility made by mass murderers and torturers. They squeeze out a handful of lies in press conferences, and tactfully "leak" a few more to their friends in the "embedded" media as part of the psychological operation (PSYOP) being run on us. These "civil war" reports are just like the reports of "Zarqawi", their "most successful PSYOP to date" according to The Washington Post. In his keynote speech to the ACLU, Seymour Hersh noted in July 2004 that Zarqawi was a Jordanian, not even an Iraqi, and the idea that he was “controlling” the insurgency was laughable. The truth is we have a total blackout on “truth”, and our leaders are bravely refusing to “talk” to the "insurgency" or "people" because that might end the war. They can’t disrupt the Bigger Bombs Business, and the opportunity to Balkanize and control Iraq as a launching point for wars on the rest of the Middle-East and Eurasia. That’s what they want to do: and if they want to “do” that, they’ll “say” anything…

Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi
Jordanian Painted As Foreign Threat To Iraq's Stability

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 10, 2006; Page A01

"...The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign."



US plans to 'fight the net' revealed

By Adam Brookes
BBC Pentagon correspondent

A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations" - from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.

Bloggers beware.



"Al-Qaeda" is a fictitious CIA and MI6 contractor on-call for anywhere they need false-flag or destabilization efforts: Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Tanzania, Yemen, Bosnia, Chechnya, Jordan, Afghanistan again, Iraq, and apparently Iran, Syria, North Korea, Egypt, Venezuela, Idaho, New Brunswick and anywhere else the U.S. wants to use “terrorist threats” as an excuse for meddling. The confusing emphasis on "Al-Qaeda" and preventing a "civil war" demonizes the Iraqi people as infighting savages infiltrated by “freedom-hating” (that’s just so stupid) “jihadists”, while conveniently ignoring all the evidence of Coalition "false flag" operations. British troops disguised as Arabs were caught faking "sectarian violence" and freed by British forces from a jail in Basra; bombings of Mosques never happen when only Muslim's fight each other; hostages are being held in exchange for a suicide bombings; arms and legs are being tied down to gas pedals in cars; and so on. To take the Pentagon seriously at this point is to forget all the lies they've told so far, committing the same intellectual suicide as those who assume that Bush definitely lied all the time before and after 9/11, but for two months or so he told the truth: it’s asinine. It's also time for this nightmare to end before Dick Cheney goes nuclear to get his Christmas Wish.

UK soldiers 'freed from militia'

Two British soldiers whose imprisonment prompted UK troops to storm a Basra police station were later rescued from militia, the Ministry of Defence says.

Brigadier John Lorimer said it was of "deep concern" the men detained by police ended up held by Shia militia. Basra governor Mohammed al-Waili said the men - possibly working undercover - were arrested for allegedly shooting dead a policeman and wounding another.



British Special Forces Caught Carrying Out Staged Terror In Iraq?
Media blackout shadows why black op soldiers were arrested

Paul Joseph Watson | September 20 2005

In another example of how the Iraqi quagmire is deliberately designed to degenerate into a chaotic abyss, British SAS were caught attempting to stage a terror attack and the media have dutifully shut up about the real questions surrounding the incident.

What is admitted is that two British soldiers in Arab garb and head dress drove a car towards a group of Iraq police and began firing. According to the Basra governor Mohammed al-Waili, one policeman was shot dead and another was injured. Pictured below are the wigs and clothing that the soldiers were wearing.



"If a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?"

- The Cheney's 2003 Christmas Card

The rest of the "people" or "insurgency" the Coalition of the Killing are attacking are being armed by Russia and China among others to keep America and Britain (basically NATO) from taking control of a strategic fuel source to wage World War Three. The entire World is watching our descent into ignorance and madness, and the possibility of this escalating anytime is real: the elite want a controlled-release of another World War to finish setting up the police state in America, and to use the United Nations to create a “One World Government” to save the World from us. They just need the right story to sell, and as long as we keep making enemies we’ll probably keep begging Big Government to keep us safe: a Big Mistake.

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive."

“The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."

"A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on Earth... and what no just government should refuse."

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."

- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States

Since the locals in Afghanistan and Iraq are overwhelmingly unhappy with the occupation, the lack of reconstruction, and how it's being brutally managed, more and more are joining the "insurgency" in self-defense against the corruption of a largely lawless and privatized military engaging in random acts of murder and torture. Even soldiers "officially" charged are returning to duty a few months later, a slap in the face to Muslims around the World. The war is being managed as a drunken game of "Risk" into a bloody failure by the fascist chicken-hawk Straussians widely known as "The Crazies" when working under the Bush Sr. and Reagan administrations, according to 27 year CIA Analyst Ray McGovern, who says Bush Sr. knew to keep their insane dreams at arms length. The racist and evil plans to totally Balkanize and control the Middle-East according to the Bernard-Lewis Plan didn't need to be botched this badly, and as the weakest and dumbest President in history, Bush has sold-out to far too many greedy interests far too fast to manage this effectively, unable to keep track of the mess or veto even one bill.

That's a Harvard MBA for ya.

The dunce

His former Harvard Business School professor recalls George W. Bush not just as a terrible student but as spoiled, loutish and a pathological liar.

By Mary Jacoby

..."I don't remember all the students in detail unless I'm prompted by something," Tsurumi said in a telephone interview Wednesday. "But I always remember two types of students. One is the very excellent student, the type as a professor you feel honored to be working with. Someone with strong social values, compassion and intellect -- the very rare person you never forget. And then you remember students like George Bush, those who are totally the opposite."



Once we stop questioning each other instead of "them", this frees up our minds from needing to question each other, and we'll feel better when we realize who the real enemies creating our fake enemies are. Once we're not enemies we can freely gamble on the worth of each other's information by seeing who we are accusing, and elevate all the ideas that shed light on the systemic changes we can finally make. Instead of chasing the works of leaders beholden to powerful interests, we need to take their leads and focus higher up the food chain of power until we can choke off the negative decisions at their sources, the only way to truly affect significant change. We need to identify the source of "crimes" against humanity like the 40,000 people a day dying needlessly from poverty, and ask why the power-brokers don't structure the economy to counter-act this.

This includes everyone on earth sharing the half-dozen valuable pieces of the puzzle we independently learn each week in any ways they can with everyone they can. We need to tell each other about valuable information sources, gain confidence in our ability to spot and promote them to sympathetic audiences, and avoid shrinking from responsibility and getting depressed over general apathy. It's never going to get easier than this, and despite all the negative hype around "spam" and getting "political", there is simply no easier way to reach, empower and enlighten people than email, the internet and DVD’s. The brainwashing will continue to intensify as they finish their endgame, and if you think it's hard to understand what's happening now, just wait for the effects of another year of fear.

Ability to Wage 'Long War' Is Key To Pentagon Plan
Conventional Tactics De-Emphasized

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 4, 2006; Page A01

The Pentagon, readying for what it calls a "long war," yesterday laid out a new 20-year defense strategy that envisions U.S. troops deployed, often clandestinely, in dozens of countries at once to fight terrorism and other nontraditional threats.



The financiers who've ruined the World's economy are the hidden factor here, the robber-barons of London and Wall Street who should take the biggest hit from the coming depression. We need to pressure them to alleviate the burden on the rest of us instead of trapping us in a police state, and as Webster Tarpley says: "If you're not in some way fighting a finance oligarch, then forget it.” The elite have arranged for us to work on lesser issues that avoid their culpability, and if we don’t pay attention they will continue to set up the police state regardless of our blissful ignorance and compartmentalized good works.

Trial ties up Senate? Don't worry; Congress is irrelevant

Copyright 1999 by Robert B. Reich
(President Bill Clinton's former Secretary of the Treasury)

...The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress have become increasingly irrelevant. The nation's business will go on, regardless of whether there's a long, drawn-out Senate trial.

In case you hadn't noticed, America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Board. Their decisions about interest rates are determining how many of us have jobs and how many of us get a raise.

When the Fed's Open Market Committee decides to lower the rates, unemployment drops and wages rise. When they raise rates, it's just the opposite. When they decide to hold rates steady, as they did last week, the economy continues to move in whatever direction it was already going.

Congress is out of this loop. Every so often, some senators or House members politely ask Greenspan to visit and talk about the economy. He obliges by riding up to the Hill and muttering convoluted sentences that no two people interpret in quite the same way. Then he goes back down to the Fed and runs the country.

America's foreign policy, meanwhile, is now being run by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), with some coaching from the Treasury Department. Their decisions are determining the fate of much of the Third World. The giant bailout they just engineered for Brazil, with lots of strings attached, will decide whether Brazil slips deeper into recession and brings most of the rest of Latin America with it.



The documentary "America: Freedom to Fascism" explains how The Federal Reserve and Central Banking systems Worldwide have been printing money from nothing, and how the inherent corruption in this massive fraud is finally leading to it's collapse. Wealthy economic interests have been using their "experts" at "think tanks" to rationalize horrible social and economic policies in magazines and on television, and convince us that our interests are the same as theirs despite radically different benefits. Sometimes they pat us on the head as they make issues too complex to understand; sometimes they do the opposite and change words like "estate tax" to "death tax" to get grassroots support for a tax break that only benefits estates valued at $2 million or more. Despite the hype and people getting outrageously “offended” by a horrible “death tax”, none of the tax-breaks benefited the poor or middle-class in any way.

"[Jim] Martin is credited with having brought the "death tax" coin back into wider circulation in 1993. He gained an ally in political mastermind Frank Luntz. Luntz, who conducted focus groups for conservative caucuses and politicians, understood the importance of language. He even wrote a rhetoric primer for conservative politicians with the Orwellian name "Language for the Twenty-first Century."

Luntz's message research found that "death tax" kindled voter resentment in a way that "inheritance tax" and "estate tax" didn't. Luntz shared his findings with Republican leaders and included the phrase in the GOP's 1994 "Contract with America."

In a strategy memo to GOP lawmakers, the media-savvy Luntz suggested that legislators stage press conferences opposing the estate tax "at your local mortuary" to dramatize the issue. "I believe this backdrop will clearly resonate with your constituents," advised Luntz. "Death is something the American people understand."10


Between the desire of the World to avoid total financial collapse, the total aggregate U.S. dollar supply, the easy removal of taxes on small businesses and a simple bearable tax on the banks, we could ensure a decent $25/hour minimum wage to offset the brunt of the recession and dollar devaluation, which despite what you might think isn't really that much. If you watch TV you can see how much stuff the rich have built for how many rich people, and it's a hell of a lot for not a hell of a lot. That's where the old "one-job easily supports a family" to the new "two-jobs barely supports a family" difference in the fruits of our labor went over the last 50 years, when the income for the poor and middle-class grew by single-digits, at the top incomes grew well over 100%.

The wealthy can help compensate for devaluation in deals with foreign creditors that could save all our skins, and we need to get their attention by bringing them to the table to negotiate by using a series of general strikes. This is what 50% of the Spanish did after The Madrid Bombings (3/11), which helped expose their very own 9/11-style "inside job" and get their soldiers safely home and out of the illegal War in Iraq. The best way to shut down the finance oligarchs is the strike at their money-supply, and the source of it is ultimately our labor. They are fairly well-hidden though, and even Forbes Magazine downplays the influence of the richest family in the World:

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws."
- Meyer Amschel Rothschild, banker (1744 - 1812)

Twenty Most Influential Businessmen
Meyer Amschel Rothschild Staff 07.21.05, 12:00 PM ET readers and editors rank Meyer Amschel Rothschild as the seventh most influential businessman of all time. ( Read more to find out how ranked them.)

Meyer Amschel Rothschild helped invent modern banking by introducing concepts such as diversification, rapid communication, confidentiality and high volume. The superlatively discreet foreign-exchange banker diversified from the very beginning, selling antiques and procuring loans. Remarkably, Rothschild was willing to cut into his own profits in order to secure future business. And, earlier than most, he understood that time and information meant money, and he pulled out all the stops to remain in constant contact with associates across Europe. That network came in handy when he helped finance England's war effort during the Napoleonic Wars. Rothschild institutionalized his bank with a far-sighted will that ensured the continuation of his business.

Considered a founding father of international finance, his banking empire--thanks to his five sons--had expanded to London, Paris, Vienna and Naples at the time of his death.


PRISON News Archive: The Bilderberg Group

130 of the most powerful people in the World have been meeting in secret to set the following year’s agenda since 1954: want to know about it? It’s 2006, it’s now or never…


The Democrats winning the House is a good sign. Or not.

With "hackable electronic voting machines" who knows what really happened, and whether the Republicans decided to throw the fight and put controlled "Democrats" in to help us go to sleep. They’ll all probably avoid fixing the problem, especially since most Democrats haven't stood up for the American people in 6 years. Pelosi's suicidal pre-election promise to avoid impeaching Bush shows they're obviously controlled: what Democrat in their right mind would say that before an election with Bush's approval ratings at 30%? It has since been echoed as a Bush "loyalty oath" by Howard Dean and John Conyers, and the Democrats early eagerness to "compromise" instead of "fight" is a sign of a "representative democracy" in total decay.

But, it’s possible that this may have woken people up, and the vote to make Benedict Pelosi the Speaker doesn't happen until January, so despite the mainstream media's premature coronation you need to let everyone know there is still a chance to dethrone her:

Impeach for Peace, a Minnesota-based impeachment group, has researched a method for impeaching the president using a little known and rarely used part of the Rules of the House of Representatives ("Jefferson's Manual"). This document actually empowers individual citizens to initiate the impeachment process themselves.

(Thanks to Causal from my blog.)


Polls show half of America wants impeachment proceedings or oversight hearings, and the spineless Democrat leaders aren't going to bother if they get the wrong people organized into supporting the fascist agenda. This is embarrassing either way: the Republicans treated the so-Demized-o-crats like dogs when they had power, refusing to listen to them, threatening the "nuclear option" of eliminating the filibuster, and even forcing John Conyers to have Congressional hearings on the Downing Street Memo in the basement. Without crucial oversight hearings there's no way to “officially” learn or stop what's happening, and with the leaders on the "Left" acting like wimps while the leaders on the "Right" act like bullies, simply defending establishment positions is suicidal.

Someone like Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean is boxed-in by the powers-that-be, and toes the party line to keep his job despite his natural activism and energy. Despite echoing Pelosi's anti-impeachment stance, in the past he's loudly mused about President Bush having foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, and appeared with the wonderful Bev Harris from to explain exactly how Diebold software is easily hacked in "Votergate: The Movie". Incidentally, check with Bev for the latest reports of election fraud, it's more rampant and less publicized than ever.

After all: we got the result we wanted right?

An utterly toothless and useless "separation of powers"?

For Dean and other Democrats or even Republicans to take on the electronic voting issue and gamble on the many others that can stop this fascist takeover, they need to have their grassroots supporters move beyond echoing their publicly watered-down and weakened rhetoric, which is often softened to avoid getting bashed by the controlled corporate media. Their followers need to embrace more radical and ultimately more "truthful" ideas to give them the political cover-fire they need to bring them up publicly, giving them an educated “base” with which to take up the fight.

Look at the "Left" (or “Right) as a spectrum, and understand that Jon Stewart probably watches more than just his show to get inspired. He and others research positions more radical than they publicly espouse, and translate what they can get away with to be “cutting edge” for their audiences. Look for "Fuel Spectrum Dominance", or the opportunity for harder-core information to inspire, enlighten and “fuel” the evolution of your current position into a more effective one, and to help you bring your preferred leaders along. If there is going to be any Congressional revolt or Constitutional Crisis, they need to see a mass-market for truth that can finally end the reign of the neo-con war-salesmen.

Using the "official" rhetoric won't work: it's designed to be limiting, and even the simplified anti-war messages play perfectly into the Republican "Talking Points" in the mass media. We've got to stop the North American Union (NAU), the police state anti-terror "drills" that could go "live", the old FEMA and new Halliburton concentration camps, the forgotten environmental destruction, the looting of pension, healthcare, social-security and other funds, and the hundreds of other tragedies accelerated over the last 5 years, and engage communities and the media in more open and constructive ways. While they are all "compromised" in some way, more and more prominent people are speaking up on behalf of their children and grandchildren, and we need to embrace the newfound realizations and courage of even the people who helped Bush steal the election in 2000:

Former top judge says US risks edging near to dictatorship

• Sandra Day O'Connor warns of rightwing attacks
• Lawyers 'must speak up' to protect judiciary

Julian Borger in Washington
Monday March 13, 2006
The Guardian

SOURCE -,,1729396,00.html

The big problem is the Anglo-American elite are racing to finish their endgame before it's completely exposed: the "War on Terror". This will lead to the growth of private-prison slavery in North America, a manufacturing and war-machine bulwark against the collapsing U.S. dollar and a means of production to attack the World. This "racist and war-mongering myth" is legitimized by both sides of the Left/Right debate, it's the basis for Bush's blank-check to wage war, and as Webster Tarpley warns: "if you share in the propagation of this myth you will share in the degradation of the ruling elite". Or more and more Fallujah's and Guantanamo's, including domestically thanks to Halliburton and others.

If you're in the media and promoting this "myth", grab an alias and your talent and help break down the lies before another nation dies. We're all on the “detainee” list of the One World Government the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Tri-lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group and others planned, and it's only a matter of time before they choke off our ability to expose this. Since 9/11 is the key to the entire “War on Terror Myth", exposing it is the easiest way to abolish it, and we can finally get back to looking at all the "normal" problems we've forgotten about. There are ways to reach everyone and people worth introducing them to:

::: The Top 10 Reasons to Support 9/11 Truth :::

The 9/11 Families: you can't get mad at me for mentioning them, I actually listened to them unlike the corporate media who told you to get mad at me.

Professor David Ray Griffin: with over 30 books on Christian theology, you can't knock his Christian Cred like he can knock yours. Jesus is down.

Webster G. Tarpley: has "the strongest approach to truth" Robert Steele's ever seen, and he's reviewed over 700 non-fiction books for

Charlie Sheen: with everything to lose he went for conspirastreet-credibility while adding the conspirasexy, hopefully inspiring more celebrity courage.

Alex Jones: the guard dog of liberty has been attacking tyranny with a multimedia assault, and airtime for hundreds of brave whistleblowers.

Dylan Avery: a 21 year old kid with a laptop, some hip hop and some creative common sense has reached millions. It's time to get "Loose".

Carole Brouillet: has been working for 5 years on exposing 9/11 Truth with grace and compassion, and continues to tirelessly inspire everyone else.

Janice Matthews: is the Executive Director of the “best” site for 9/11 Truth, it was even featured on the activist’s T-shirt in a recent South Park episode.

Professor Steven Jones: he lost his job teaching at BYU to Save The World, and has proven that “controlled demolition” is the obvious answer.

Hugo Chavez: as the first leader to call for an international investigation into the crimes of 9/11, he’s once again proving that he’s “for real”.

The classic "evil outside threat" to our "perfect society" storybook stuff is what the Nazi's did to focus the people on their simplistic war-mongering propaganda, and these guys are even creating domestic "sectarian violence" using fake internal and external enemies to hide investigations into their own crimes. If they succeed in solidifying the "War on Terror" myth and making any actions taken against "terrorism" normal, you'll see "V for Vendetta", where the police can grab anyone for any reason. Police and soldiers aren’t safe either, as being drugged, surveilled, chipped and totally corrupted by that point, they will be nastier than we've known them: just like the Guantanamo guards.

VeriChip wants to chip every US soldier

Posted Aug 24th 2006 5:43AM
by Donald Melanson

Despite some pretty significant security concerns, everyone's favorite futurific company VeriChip is looking to get its chips under the skin of the largest group of people yet: the entire US military.



No one will be "happier" under this arrangement, as it keeps constricting individual freedom and trust. It's like that now in much of the World thanks in part to graduates of the (torture) "School of the Americas" at Ft. Benning, Georgia. You can Google it, and Susan Sarandon even narrated a documentary about it a few years ago.

SOA Watch Updates & Actions

Converge on Fort Benning: November 17-19, 2006
Commemorate the Victims and Celebrate the Resistance

This November 17-19, civil rights movement leaders, torture survivors, grandmothers, war veterans, faith communities, union organizers, families, puppeteers and social justice activists from across the Americas will converge on Fort Benning, Georgia, to speak out against the SOA/WHINSEC and to change oppressive U.S. foreign policy. At the same time, social movement activists will gather in Central and South America, calling for an end to U.S. intervention and the closure of the SOA/WHINSEC. Together, and in numbers too big to be ignored, we will take a stand for justice, peace and accountability and against the racist system of violence and domination that is represented by the SOA/WHINSEC. Repressive militaries are not the answer to the problems of our day and age.


If we finally find out we're supporting it overseas we can stop it, but it will be a completely different matter when it's completely "legal" and "normal" and a central tenet of "democracies" under Western Civilization.

Reporter: "What do you think of Western Civilization?"
Gandhi: "I think it would be a good idea."

The elite’s back-up plan is World War Three, including regular "Global Guardian" thermo-nuclear drills renamed "Global Hawk", and regular saber-rattling between the U.S. and Russia and China since 1999 over the unprovoked bombing of Kosovo and bombing of the Chinese embassy in Serbia. While we may have an information vacuum in North America, the information being gathered around the World has coalesced into a simple idea: "Madmen have taken control of America, we need to prepare for what they might do next." The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) helps facilitate that, as Russia and China head a coalition of Asian countries and invited guests to discuss what to do about America going nuts, including their own NATO-style alliances.

As part of their panic attacks on us, the "peak oil" thing is a fraud to help sell us higher gas prices, and has been sold to the public every few years since the 1970's. While there are normal improvements to be made along the supply-chain, there are no shortages with so many areas still not fully surveyed, and when great powers rush to grab oil it's not about shortages: it's about gearing up for war. I even asked at prominent "peak oil theory" proponent: "Is there a lot of oil?", he said "Oh no!", I said "Well if there's only a small amount what's the point of fighting?", he said "Oh no, there's more than that", I said "So if there's as much oil as there was before, what's all the fuss about now?", and he couldn't answer because despite being a peak oil proponent he had no clue how much oil there was. However: it will help pay your rent, so it might be worth it to study the propaganda and squeeze out an article or two. The simple truth is the gas companies are making 400% more money while we're paying 50% more money for the same gas, so there's no "supply chain" issues either.

Oil industry awash in record levels of cash
But a smaller portion of profits is going to find new oil discoveries

By John W. Schoen
Senior Producer
Updated: 9:12 a.m. ET July 21, 2005

When major oil companies report their quarterly profits next week, they're once again expected to post record numbers. With crude trading around $60 a barrel, the oil industry is enjoying one of the biggest windfalls in its history. But as the industry looks for places to put that cash, it's finding it harder and harder to put funds to work finding new deposits of oil and natural gas.

By just about any measure, the past three years have produced one of the biggest cash gushers in the oil industry’s history. Since January of 2002, the price of crude has tripled, leaving oil producers awash in profits. During that period, the top 10 major public oil companies have sold some $1.5 trillion worth of crude, pocketing profits of more than $125 billion.


If I sold your restaurant plastic forks for 5-cents each, and one day I came in and said they're now 10-cents, you'd say what's the matter? Is plastic more expensive? Manufacturing? Transportation? Are we all taking the same hit on the rising costs? If I said no, I just want to make twice as much money, you’d probably hit me. The gas (oil) companies can say whatever they want, but in reality they're just profiteering in all the confusion:

Bush Didn’t Bungle Iraq, You Fools
The Mission Was Indeed Accomplished

Published by Greg Palast March 20th, 2006

… Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep a lid on Iraq’s oil production - limiting Iraq’s oil pumping to the tight quota set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.

There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil - not to get more of Iraq’s oil, but to prevent Iraq producing too much of it.

You must keep in mind who paid for George’s ranch and Dick’s bunker: Big Oil. And Big Oil - and their buck-buddies, the Saudis - don’t make money from pumping more oil, but from pumping less of it. The lower the supply, the higher the price.



The so-called Bush Doctrine of "pre-emption" is what’s allowing them to simply declare countries a “threat” and attack them without providing any “proof”. The Nuremberg Trials called unprovoked wars of aggression "the supreme crime" when indicting the Nazi's, especially in the nuclear age, and the rest of the World knows it. This could be a neo-con red-herring designed to get us focusing on them and their very public Project for the New American Century plans, as opposed to the European puppet-masters ready to save us all from those damn Yankees. It’s not guaranteed, but it plays into the big picture nicely, and can be added to the list of possibilities.

The whole rationale behind this foreign policy is the "War on Terror", an issue that if it was actually "real" the local police and foreign aid would solve: just arrest the crazies and get the rest of the people food and jobs. That solves everything. The reason the Israeli government is treating the Palestinians like rocks is to maintain their power and control over the Israeli people, so basically their government is full of scumbags just ours. I had a discussion with a friend of mind about the use of that and other derogatory terms for politicians, but frankly if you can't call mass-murderer's the worst words in the book, then what the hell are they meant for? Stubbing your toe?

According to filmmaker Aaron Russo, his former friend Nick Rockefeller said if he joined the New World Order he could get an RFID chip that would say "KMA" when a cop stopped him, or "Kiss My Ass", allowing him immunity from any prosecution. That's the World the ruling elite want for themselves, that's where they are taking us, that’s what we have to resist, and understanding how all the fascinating pieces work together is key.

The elite are gambling on us being too stupid and distracted to notice all the ways they are trying to enslave us, and as long as we gamble on ALL the people trying to expose them, we may win this one yet.

Good night, and good luck.

Peace, (NOW!!!)



Black Krishna Brand

MySpace -

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Stewart and Colbert show us they're lying and trying to dumb us down, to find out why and help Save The World, please Google for "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", "America: Freedom to Fascism" and "". Also, check the daily newswires at "" and "" -- and pass this info on to everybody -- NOW!!!