Wednesday, August 09, 2006

"Some have expressed concern over Newt Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency", while referring to Ned Lamont supporters in Connecticut." (Ta-daa!)

Here it is, ta-daa!

Fascism! :P

Y-ep, that's right, it's near, it's here, and it hates queers!

And anyone who disagrees with them fascistas is a lilly-livered queer "insurgent" terrorist scumbag who deserves to be put in camps and tortured until they see the light of day.

(Or maybe just leave 'em there to die, whatever...)

This is all classic incrementalism, just like the bird-flu crap they spring on us every few months - when it finally gets here we'll all be "smart" enough to say "See? I told you!"

Ye Olde Rapin' Rummy, the man (loosely defined) who sold Saddam bio-weapons also owns shares in Gilead, the company that makes Tamiflu, the alleged vaccine. He's already profited off the jump in stock price according to Forbes Magazine and CNN Money, among several others. (Google "rumsfeld tamiflu", or something like that.)

They even tried this crap back in the late 1970's with "pig flu", here's a bit of the BBC News breakin' it down...

"Previous small outbreaks of swine influenza proved false alarms. In 1986, a Dutch man suffered severe pneumonia after contracting a virus, and in 1977 a similar virus turned up in a handful of people in Fort Dix, New Jersey."


All of these potential "epidemics" or "pandemics" or "bullshitemics" of the 20th Century originate at U.S. military bases, and it's frequently soldiers who are experimented on until they produce the first victims - themselves. (Google "tuskeegee experiment", or talk to the millions of homeless Vietnam Veterans foraging for food in the urban wilderness of America.)

The U.S. military is a completely corrupted and compromised organization that hasn't had a point since WWII. Everything they've done since then has been a moral mistake meant to advance an evil imperial agenda - and here we are!

Their phenomenal propaganda machine has ensured that no one pays attention to how much money was spent building up the various war machines and tearing them down, and who loaned all that money to the governments involved:

He who controls the debt controls the debtor.

That's right, The Big Banks stole the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913, and then started all of these insane wars by funding the various combatants - who in turn advanced the agenda's of various corporations and still do today - ALL of them owned by The Big Banks. That's right. ALL of them.

After all, where do you or your company get and keep your money?

It's a giant scam, it's extortion, graft, bribery, murder, rape, theft, and everything else you can think of as ordered by the New World Order (Bush Sr.'s term used in a speech on September 11, 1991) and it's variant parties. Sure there's arguments within this giant pyramid scheme made by the various parties, but they're not the ones we make, and they're not the ones we hear.

People have been talking about this forever since it's been going on forever, and the more we dismiss people like former President John F. Kennedy and former war hero - the most decorated marine of his time - General Smedley Butler, the more trouble we'll be in.

The latter foiled the attempted Nazi-fascist coup against the social-democratic programs of President Roosevelt that he was asked to lead in 1933, and said:

Released September 11, 2001
The Wisdom Fund, P. O. Box 2723, Arlington, VA 22202
Website: -- Press Contact: Enver Masud

'War Is a Racket'

Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933 by General Smedley Darlington Butler, USMC. General Butler was the recipient of two Congressional Medals of Honor - one of only two Marines so honored.

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses...

There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.



So, cut it out.

Stop indulging in the economic and political nonsense being bandied about the mainstream media, it's just garbage meant to confuse us, and it's racist treatment of people overseas we never hear from or see has to stop before billions die - including us.

Billions of dollars are spent on justifications for objectively insane actions and consequences, and our talking heads and pundits act like our supposed "enemies" are faceless savages who want nothing more than to kill all of us - including apparently inventing all sorts of intricate geopolitical plots and schemes to work together to come and get us.

It's a lie. It's crap. All they want to do is chill out.

Everyone knows who's in charge, everyone's dealt with it for years, everyone knows they don't have the resources to start a fight, and everyone knows it sucks that the West won't help them. But, no one wants to pick a fight with the U.S., the U.K., Israel, or anyone else who can destroy them easily if they choose to - and nobody ever does.

Honestly, just like us, nobody cares.

Even all the tinpot dictators in the Middle-East are supported by the West - how the hell else are they in power? And why don't we see what the U.S. does with regimes it can't stand, like in Cuba, North Korea and formerly Iraq? Where's the embargoes?

The answer is there aren't any, and these puppets like all the others in the 20th Century are merely strung along until the U.S. wants to convince the public that they pose a threat, at which time the U.S. military gets another chance to practice sodomizing another country.

Basically, Daddy is teaching his 14 year old son how to rape his 6 year old son, and we're about to take on the role of the rapee.

Just like in hundreds of authoritarian regimes around the world, our intelligence agencies, cops and soldiers are being trained to hate and fear us, and they can't see the forest for the trees: once they're used up they'll be killed or jailed too, and replaced with a fresh crop of soldiers propagandized with no knowledge of the past.

That's why soldiers are more valuable than cops, they offer completely controlled young and impressionable minds, and can be tested, drugged and ordered completely at will to do just about anything.

(See: Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, Baghram, and the hundreds of others in the growing Secret Prison Industrial Complex.)

Or just ask the hundreds of cops fired in New Orleans.

Oh sure, many may have been corrupt enough as it is and allowed the looting and shooting to occur, but alas, they knew too much. So, they were simply let go in favour of soldiers who are stashed on bases and propagandized 24 hours a day by the army.

It's a beautiful system, since the local cops may live in your local neighborhood, have local friends, barbecue locally on the weekends and put their kids in local schools.

However, if you replace them with soldiers who have no local ties, and are either foreign troops or those returned home after being stationed overseas at any of the 700 U.S. military bases around the World, you can easily convince those soldiers to destroy that community in a way the police never would - and completely enslave the people they have absolutely no ties to. (See: The Rest Of The World.)

It's the classic Hitlerian "Night of the Long Knives" crap that even the most evil neo-con supporters have to be concerned about, and the way fascism works is a continual centralization of power, enslavement of people, and destruction of all free expression and thought until there are only a handful of scumbags left at the top running their toy soldiers like a videogame while laughing at their gullibility.

Then those at the top will just use a bioweapon kill everybody with their tight-knit cadre of personal private bodyguards and scientists, and chill out with some stem cells and virgin's blood to keep 'em young'n'fit. And that's that.

Anyway, we've got anywhere from 2 to 5 years before there is a total police state takeover of North America and Europe, and likely the rest of the World. It's happening all over the place, and the media's acceptance of the Republican's use of the word "insurgent" to describe anti-war dissenters is just the tip of the iceberg ramming into the unsinkable Titanic of Free Speech in America.


"Unsinkable", eh?

Progressive Daily Beacon /

Newt Gingrich Considers Political Opposition, American Citizens, to be an ''Insurgency''

A. Alexander / Progressive Daily Beacon | August 9 2006

Some have expressed concern over Newt Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency", while referring to Ned Lamont supporters in Connecticut. From a personal perspective, Gingrich was correct in obliquely referring to America's blogosphere and directly Lamont supporters, as being an "insurgency". Gingrich, of course, meant the term to be derogatory and a means of linking those that oppose Bush's war follies with terrorists. Still, Crazy Newt the serial divorcer was correct in more ways than he fully understands and, too, revealed the Neo-Conservative agenda in a clear and yet, unintended way.

That Gingrich would openly refer to those who oppose Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative madness as being an "insurgency" is, in a very real sense, the first public admission that the Bush regime and Republicans are at war with the American people. It is a blatant confession of the ultimate Neo-Conservative agenda, i.e. a deliberate and swift movement toward a very real Executive dictatorship wherein those who dissent or disagree are "the enemy" or members of an "insurgency". Gingrich's use of the term "insurgency" when referring to fellow Americans reveals in no uncertain terms the reality that the Neo-Cons recognize a movement forming that consists of the American people and that is designed to directly challenge their drive toward a nationalist imperialistic dictatorship.

Open and truly democratic governments don't view their political opponents as "enemies" whose opposition is looked upon as an "insurgency", and they certainly don't feel a need to be at war with the people they govern. For Gingrich, Bush, Republicans and the entire Neo-Conservative movement; however, the reality is that the American people are increasingly questioning their "right to rule" and are, therefore, considered enemies or, as Newt Gingrich more aptly said, an "insurgency".

The fact of the matter is that Newt Gingrich is right! There is no better way of defining and describing those American citizens who have formed and continue forming a direct and spirited opposition to the Neo-Conservatives' madness, as being anything other than an "insurgency". Bush and Republicans have busied themselves at the task of disregarding American laws; International laws; have committed war crimes; lied to the American people in order to engage in war with Iraq; unilaterally exempted themselves from the Constitution; committed treason by revealing an undercover CIA agent's name; undermined a free press; illegally spied upon American citizens; instituted a policy of merging church and state; stacked the courts with nefarious individuals that would knowingly and willingly support an Executive dictatorship; provided their crony pals with government appointments and large government contracts that have resulted in grotesque profits without services being provided; raped the nation's treasury; supported big oils' obscene profit taking at the expense of the American people; left New Orleans to rot and refused to help while more than 1,300 citizens perished, and through stygian deception refused to hold anyone to account.

Bush-Republican Neo-Conservatives have consolidated all the government's powers and have used that power as a tool to undermine America's democracy, to viciously assail any citizen who openly disagrees with their policies, and to cow their opposition. As such, the people have no effective systematic recourse or resources through which to oppose their government, other than through the formation of an internet "insurgency".

The Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative form of governance displays all the symptoms of tyranny and as such is deserving of being opposed in the most strenuous manner, including the formation of an internet-based political "insurgency". It is in fact the patriotic duty of every American citizen to directly confront and oppose the tyranny being imposed upon the United States of America by the Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative movement. Therefore, if Newt Gingrich wishes to expose once and for all, the fact that the Bush-Republican Neo-Conservative movement views the American people as their enemy and chooses to label the American people as being an "insurgency", he is correct in so doing!

What choice do the American people have, but to form an "insurgency" when the current government has consolidated its power in such a way that the people have no legal or Constitutional means through which to protect themselves and their civil liberties? If Gingrich chooses to label fellow Americans as "enemies" or being part of an "insurgency", I personally welcome his unintended honesty. If fighting for the American way of life, freedom, liberty, and the Constitution makes the blogosphere an "insurgency" the label should be worn with pride.


Peace by picking the propaganda out of my nose...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Check the and newswires for 5 minutes a day, and buy the DVD to distribute copies or watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video! NOW!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.


Post a Comment

<< Home