Friday, July 28, 2006

C-SPAN to Air Historic 9/11 Exposé: July 29th at 8PM (EST), and then air it again for the West Coast at 11pm EST (10pm CST).

C-SPAN to Air Historic 9/11 Exposé

9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda Panel Discussion to Run on Saturday, July 29th at 8PM (EST)

Infowars | July 27, 2006

C-SPAN has confirmed that their coverage of the 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda Panel Discussion will air on C-SPAN 1 on July 29th at 8PM (EST). The panel features incredible presentations by 9/11 Scholars for Truth founder James Fetzer, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones, President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Filmmaker and Radio Broadcaster Alex Jones, and Terrorism Expert Webster Tarpley.

The appearance of this discussion on the nation’s premiere public affairs cable network is an incredible boon to the 9/11 Truth Movement. None of the 9/11 Truth events that C-SPAN has covered in the past are as hard-hitting as the 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda program. This panel discussion cuts to the heart of the issue and exposes the events of September 11th, 2001 as a complex premeditated plot carried out by criminal elements within the U.S. Government as a pretext for launching the endless “War on Terror” in which the globe is currently embroiled. C-SPAN’s coverage of this pivotal information will bring considerable national attention to the 9/11 Truth Movement. It will also lend further credibility to the Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the premiere organization within the movement for peer-reviewed scientific research on 9/11 issues.


If you don't have cable, you can watch online by clicking here

See the four-camera Infowars coverage of the Panel Discussion right now by becoming a member of

Each member of the panel brought their own particular perspective and expertise to the discussion while each maintained throughout their comments that 9/11 was an “inside job.”

Alex Jones, a progenitor of the 9/11 Truth Movement introduced the panel and acted as moderator. Professor Steven E. Jones, an expert in Physics, re-capped his vital new research which has conclusively proven that demolition incendiaries were used to bring down World Trade Center and could have only been placed there in advance of 9/11.

As a Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota and a former Marine Corps officer, James Fetzer cut through the myths surrounding the 9/11 hijackers. Former Air Force Interceptor Pilot Robert Bowman brought up the lack of air defense on the day of 9/11 and shed light on the slough of drills conducted on 9/11 to distract the military and prevent Flights 11 & 77 from being shot down.

Finally Author and Historian Webster Tarpley tied all of the information together to paint a picture of 9/11. He described the drills, Bush’s actions and the blow-by-blow details of that fateful day that revealed what could only be called the horrible truth of a conspiracy fact.

It is crucial that everyone see this historic panel discussion on C-SPAN. Tell your friends and family, email colleagues, and post links on message boards. This is an incredible step in spreading the truth about 9/11.

The program will air on C-SPAN 1 at 8PM EST (7PM CST) on Saturday, July 29th and then air again for the West Coast at 11pm EST (10pm CST).



Peace by paying attention to public broadcasting proof...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


P.S. Watch "TerrorStorm" on Google Video!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

BONUS: Don't get it twisted, the same people who are selling you "terror", "war" and "security" as an overly complex conversational noose of lies that normalizes fundamentally radical decisions leading to domestic police state measures and World War III... are selling you this.

A friend told me he heard a famous liberal radio host interviewed about "what the Shia would do" in the region, and that he found it quite enlightening.

Well, first of all, if you want to know what "the Shia" would do, ask "the Shia", and don't just be another old white guy talking about the mainstream's rehashed mess of tired old arguments told by tired old white guys.

Second, I already know what they'll do: if they're hit, they'll hit back.

I know what my 5 year old cousin would do: if he's hit, he'll hit back.

I know what the Quebecois, B.C. and Ontario would do: if hit, they'll hit back.

There's no need to anthropologically separate them like discussing primitive tribes, and there's no need to make these conflicts as intransigent as they seem.

This is one big political lie.

Here's the simple truth, when you bomb the hell out of people without even trying to talk to them, and kill thousands of innocent victims: they get very angry.

When you lie and tell your own citizens they're angry because they want to attack "The Homeland" as opposed to because you're bombing the hell out of them without talking to them: they get very angry.

Then you can spin the whole mess in a web of political gobbledygook that justifies some great, big, stupid "Risk" style boardgame theorizing. This completely distracts people from the people who actually benefit from these events and often help engineer them. We avoid talking about major financial beneficiaries and their obvious roles in either allowing stuff like this to happen by assuring shareholders it will improve profits and power, or lobbying effectively to influence the process to ensure they'll benefit.

This is the root of all political decision-making, and all the rhetoric about what the "islamo-fascists" will do is bunk: whoever there will do the same thing humans have done since the dawn of time - fight back. The problem with those of us concerned over here is that we have the wrong discussions about who's responsible since many of us still trust the mainstream media, and thus we get trapped in the same useless conversations as everyone else. The only way to break this cycle is to transcend it with something sexier, more practical, and more tangible.

Basically, the money behind the means.

Basically, the money behind the mean.

Basically, I also think the story below is crap, and I think they found a patsy to carry out the shootings and ramp up the police state by scaring people, and that you won't hear much about him after this. Or you will. But he won't be saying much.

But, it's only 13 minutes old, so we'll see.

Just remember that while the police may or may not be your friends, the police state being built will enslave everybody, so it's best that everybody work together to calm down and figure out why our governments are trying to scare and anger us - and as "corrupt" politicians (naturally) who's pulling their strings...

Yahoo! News

6 shot, 1 fatally at Seattle Jewish center

By TIM BOOTH, Associated Press Writer 13 minutes ago

SEATTLE - A man walked into a Jewish organization Friday afternoon and opened fire, killing one person and injuring at least five others before he was arrested, officials said.

The gunman, who employees said claimed to be a Muslim angry at Israel, forced his way through the security door at the Jewish Federation after an employee had punched in her security code, said Marla Meislin-Dietrich, a co-worker who was not at the building at the time.

Staff members said they overheard him saying "'I am a Muslim American, angry at Israel,' before opening fire on everyone,"
Meislin-Dietrich said. "He was randomly shooting at everyone."

Police would not confirm the account.

David Gomez, an FBI assistant special agent in charge of counterterrorism, said investigators believe the gunman targeted the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle.

"We believe at this point it's a lone individual acting out antagonism toward this particular organization," Gomez said.

* Email Story
* IM Story
* Discuss
* Printable View



Israeli aggression on Lebanon, July 2006


Do you know what kind of weapons causes this damage?

As-Safir Newspaper

July 21st, 2006

I left the office early last night ; at midnight.

There was only one devastating picture yesterday : that of two people who were killed in air strikes on Akkar,(the poorer area) in the north, late Wednesday night.

Both corps were black, both were dismembered , both were "weird". I don't think it matters anymore to try to prove that Israel is using unconventional , forbidden weapons .. that would only prove that it should have used "allowed" weapons. Who cares, people are dying anyway. And whatever weapons are being used , the pollution they're creating will kill the survivors from cancer later.

The rest of the pictures were less devastating, conventional : demolished houses, wiped out villages and towns, more refugees , some of them starving, lovely babes on board of US marines ships and colored people from poor countries lining up in front of embassies hoping they will get them out of this hell.

The really devastating pictures will came later , much later, some day when all this will stop maybe we'll be able to visit the ruins of whole villages. But even then it might be too late : how long does it take corps buried under rubbles to disintegrate and vanish ?



Post a Comment

<< Home