SEE??? Even corrupt-ass Judges are calling them Nazi's!!! ("Go on, it's okay, you can call them Nazi's...")

[Ed note: Alex Jones just said "I hate to say it folks, but we're all going to die." I also hate to say it, but I believe him, and believe it's possible that it may happen sooner than we think. As he just said now in response to emails saying Q: "Why do you also keep 9 year old cable-access shows on the air?" A: "Because - while I'm proud, I'm also really sad that we haven't stopped it, but everything I said 9 years ago has happened, and the Globalists are just carrying out their plans."

You go Infowars.com, you go give us all hell until we realize that it's actually here on earth...]


(...)


"Time alone - oh, time will tell:
Think you're in heaven, but ya living in hell...
Think you're in heaven, but ya living in hell...
Think you're in heaven, but ya living in hell...
Time alone - oh, time will tell:
Ya think you're in heaven, but ya living in hell..."

- Bob Marley and The Wailers, "Time Will Tell"


(...)


I spoke with a very well-respected lawyer and law-professor a while back, an extremely intelligent man who helped take cases against the U.S. government to the war crimes tribunal at The Hague, among other noble causes.

He, in extremely clear and erudite language, made it obvious to us that judges are fundamentally corrupt. That, in their ivory towers politikin' with rich and powerful peers, they were totally detached from the reality of what the average citizen goes through and what punishment the average criminal deserves. A bunch of sexless hermits smooth-like-a-G.I. Joe under their robes isolate themselves from the public trust, believe their infallibility based on the dusty diatribes of ancient tired texts'n'tomes, and arbitrarily affect racist stereotypes in disaffecting entire cultural groups with prison terms.

I argued for parallel actions within the system, gumming-up the works, class-action suits, mass-mobilization with a legitimizing street-credibility to ensure average people have confidence in the possibility of shaking up the establishment.

He was disgusted with my ignorance.

Sympathetic.

But disgusted.


(...)


The sweet-spot of humanity in the Western World has been moved.

It used to be the white-middle-class, who reacted to their kids being prosecuted for experimenting wtih marijuana and given criminal records with outrage, nearly forcing a dramatic change in the laws to allow for legalization. Up until that point the darkies and protestors had been targeted, but no more: it was time for the white-middle-class to fight back against persecution of their own. At one point, even President Jimmy Carter said he supported the posession of marijuana for private, personal, and recreational use.

It all ended when that ex-CIA crack-dealer George Bush Sr. stuck his hand up Reagan's ass and ran the world into the ground.

(See: The documentary Grass on DVD. It's narrated by Woody Harrelson. It's awesome.)


(...)


The sweet-spot is now the elite.

Those who control information and how we think, how we love, how we live, and how we feel we are no longer in control of our society in any meaningful way.

And make no mistake: they know what they are doing.

I spoke to a friend yesterday and mentioned that watching the news with her I could deconstruct every single lie in every single story, or every single bias that is designed to make us feel powerless due to their authoritative arrogance in telling us what is "news" and how to feel about it.

She said: "That's why I take everything with a grain of salt."

I said aside from needing a pillar of salt the size of the Tower of Babylon, what we consistently fail to understand is they are smarter than us when it comes to their business, and they clearly know what they are doing.

How could they not?

How could they not be aware of how their customers feel?

How could they continue to make us feel this way?


(...)


What is now clear is that even the most isolated and elitist circles of power are feeling the crunch of eroding freedoms, the "boiling frog" effect, where to cook a frog you turn up the heat in the pot slowly so the frog doesn't jump out, and thus the frog passively accepts being cooked to death.

For the last year or so I've seen us get a lot dumber and more paranoid.

I find that sad.

I also know that WE are all peers.

I know that if WE saw the same information we'd believe roughly the same thing, while confidently arguing over nuances and solutions.

I remember a world like this, where the balance of information was agreed upon and shared, and collective intelligence could be applied in a way that was widely accepted and constructive. Debates had common first principles, and while ignorance still existed as it always has, it did not dominate the way it does now.

That world no longer exists.

And...

Even the people who helped destroy it are now finally regretting it...

Infowars.com

Judges liken terror laws to Nazi Germany

London Independent | October 16, 2005
By Marie Woolf, Raymond Whitaker and Severin Carrell

A powerful coalition of judges, senior lawyers and politicians has warned that the Government is undermining freedoms citizens have taken for granted for centuries and that Britain risks drifting towards a police state. One of the country's most eminent judges has said that undermining the independence of the courts has frightening parallels with Nazi Germany.

Senior legal figures are worried that "inalienable rights" could swiftly disappear unless Tony Blair ceases attacking the judiciary and freedoms enshrined in the Human Rights Act.

Lord Ackner, a former law lord, said there was a contradiction between the Government's efforts to separate Parliament and the judiciary through the creation of a supreme court, and its instinct for directing judges how to behave. He cautioned against "meddling" by politicians in the way the courts operate.

"I think it is terribly important there should not be this apparent battle between the executive and the judiciary. The judiciary has been put there by Parliament in order to ensure that the executive acts lawfully. If we take that away from the judiciary we are really apeing what happened in Nazi Germany," he said.

Lord Ackner added that the Government's proposals to hold terrorist suspects for three months without charge were overblown. "The police have made a case for extending the two weeks but to extend it to three months is excessive."

Lord Lester QC, a leading human rights lawyer, expressed concern that the Government was flouting human rights law and meddling with the courts.

"If the Prime Minister and other members of the Government continue to threaten to undermine the Human Rights Act and interfere with judicial independence we shall have to secure our basic human rights and freedoms with a written constitution," he said.

Lord Carlile, a deputy High Court judge, warned against the whittling away of historic civil liberties. "We have to be acute about protecting what is taken for granted as inalienable rights. In the United States the Patriot Act included a system whereby a witness to a terrorist incident can be detained for up to a year. This is in the land of the free."

The senior barrister remarked that judges had now replaced MPs as the defenders of basic human rights.

"People use d to look to their MPs as the first port of call to deal with any perceived injustice by the executive. Now there is an increasing tendency for people to look to the judges to protect their liberties," he said.

Mark Oaten, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said Tony Blair was transforming Britain into an authoritarian state. "In eight years he has dismantled centuries of judicial protection. Britain's reputation as the world's most tolerant nation is now under threat," he said.

If Mr Blair's proposed terror legislation was unamended, said Anthony Scrivener QC, "Britain would be a significant step closer to a police state". The Prime Minister spoke of "summary justice", said the lawyer: "It would be better named street justice."

This week the Law Lords will consider whether evidence obtained under torture abroad should be admissible in British courts. Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said admitting such evidence would undermine one of Britain's basic freedoms.

"The Prime Minister is trying in his own words to try to tear up the rules of the game," she said. "The rules of liberal democracy are about no torture, free speech and fair trials. Every time he denigrates these he undermines the fabric of our society."

REAL SOURCE - http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/uk_judges_liken_terror_laws_nazi_germany.htm







RECYCLED BONUS: Want to make sense of it? The S&M approach to information will destroy the rest of your B.S. fears and their ability to control you. You'll freak-out, then you'll relax, and then you'll make power-moves...


Download a classic documentary and the classic sequel, and once you realize the world is made of Jell-O, go ahead, it's okay, take another look at it...

911: the Road to Tyranny (2002)

http://www.archive.org/details/911theRoadtoTyranny


Martial Law 9/11: Rise Of The Police State (2005)

http://www.archive.org/details/MartialLaw911

(...)


BONUS: Oh what the hell, the Government is responsible for all the terrorism, blah-blah-blah, we're all screwed if we won't wake up, blah-blah-blah...

Infowars.com

More Highly Credible Whistle Blowers Identifying Global 'Al-Qaeda' Terrorism as State Controlled

Looking back at the Bali bombing and new whistleblowers

Paul Joseph Watson | October 18 2005

During an interview for an Australian documentary, former Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid unequivocally fingered the Indonesian authorities as the true culprits behind the 2002 Bali bombings.

Wahid said the authorities were acting at the behest of Western intelligence agencies.

Other sources used for the documentary were adamant that there were no Al-Qaeda affiliated terrorist groups in existence that were not controlled by intelligence agencies.

Indonesia has become renowned for rampant corruption and state involvement in terrorist atrocities. Sources told the film makers that government connected establishment figures are carrying out an agenda of depopulation in the targeted areas by lowering the value of property and resources, then buying it on the cheap.

The United States government had advance knowledge of the October 12 2002 Bali bombing. They passed that knowledge on to the Taiwanese government and told them to keep the information top secret.

Hours before the bombing took place, the US withdrew all its administrative staff and diplomats from Indonesia, citing a 'security threat'. The British government also received the same warning but this wasn't passed on to any relevant authority or the hundreds of victims carelessly making their way to a beach party.

The plastic explosives used in the attack were of military origin and were used primarily by the US military.

Immediately after the bombing, the FBI, the Australian Secret Service and British secret police swooped in to the bomb site and ruthlessly took charge of the investigation, much to the anger of the Indonesian authorities and the Balinese police.

Why were they so eager to take control? Were they attempting to cover their tracks and lead the other unwitting investigators away from any other conclusion but that the bombing was carried out by suicide bombers?

The very organization blamed by the authorities for the bombing responded by saying the attack was the work of the CIA, Mossad and Australian Secret Service.

Back in July we released an article which called for, "all governments who still operate outside of the control of the Globalists to come forward and join humanity in unveiling the real terrorists who are attempting to deform the world into a prison planet."

This was a plea for all credible whistleblowers, and especially those within government, to shine a spotlight on the true face of terrorism,

"We are calling on all whistleblowers to reveal themselves now and stand with us in the corner of truth and the future of this species. These bastards are indiscriminate killers and withholding information only paints a bigger target on your forehead. Your words need to be heard."

"On a governmental level the challenge is here before you. Either scream from the rooftops about government orchestrated terrorism or sit back and watch your country become a victim of it as it is wrestled away from your hands and placed in the domain of a black and cancerous global dictatorship."

Since this article the crescendo if credible individuals blowing the whistle on government sponsored terror has increased.

After British SAS officers were caught dressed in Arab garb, shooting at police and, according to some sources, allegedly driving a car filled to the brim with explosives, the Iranian government came out and accused the US and Britain of staging car bombings in Iraq and also being behind bombings in Iran in an attempt to destabilize the government.

Meanwhile, in the US, the so-called threat to attack the New York Subway was admitted to be a hoax. This of course was only released after Mayor Bloomberg's approval ratings had increased and sufficient attention had been distracted away from the imminent indictments of top Bush administration officials.

The Globalists are reeling and exposure of government sponsored terror has them on the ropes. Some developments might even tempt us to speculate that they have backed off using terror to attempt further seizures of power. The Globalists are like junkies, every terror attack has less and less of a fear impact on the general public. Therefore the attacks need to increase in scale to have any real impact. However, increasing the scale only increases the size of the Globalists' dirty fingerprints all over the crime. They are frozen by the fear of being caught.

Is the move to push Bird Flu as the new boogeyman a shift away from the terror paradigm? It is possible but we should never underestimate the audacity of the Globalists.

The end goal remains the same. The complete militarization of America, the confiscation of every citizen's firearms, and the brutal desecration of liberty as we know it.

REAL SOURCE - http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/credible_whistle_blowers_alqaeda_state_controlled.htm


Peace, (NOW!!!)
BK

_________________

...

Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy - http://blackkrishna.blogspot.com/

Music - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/0/blackkrishna.htm

...