Sunday, January 21, 2007

RAW STORY: Cheney says Washington is 'all BS,' full of 'suffering fools' + BBC: Beating the Votestapo! + CSPAN: Tarpology 101: Let's Get It





















Cheney says Washington is 'all BS,' full of 'suffering fools'

Raw Story | January 19, 2007
Michael Roston

Vice President Cheney believes Washington is full of "suffering fools" and "all BS" that should be ignored, according to a friend quoted today in the Washington Post.

The Post's David Ignatius ponders how Vice President Dick Cheney manages to retain so much power in the White House in spite of the ruinous political consequences that his policy has had for the Bush presidency. One insight Ignatius offers is that Cheney is driven by a belief that politics in the nation's capital is "all BS" that he believes should be ignored.

In his column, Ignatius suggests that "Cheney has been the political equivalent of a black hole -- exerting a powerful but mostly invisible force on decisions. The Office of the Vice President has had a gravitational weight that sucked in other personalities and entire branches of the government without emitting light or heat that would explain the decision-making process."


With this analogy in mind, the Post columnist acknowledges that Cheney's influence in the White House has sometimes waned. But an important principle has held throughout his service in the Bush White House: his "urging [of] the president to ignore politics and maintain a tough course on Iraq."

According to an old Cheney friend, Ignatius writes, in the aftermath of Watergate the vice president maintained a frame of mind in which "he got tired of suffering fools."

"He thinks it's all BS," the friend quipped.

Cheney's disregard for Washington politics then "ripened when he made enough money as chief executive of Halliburton that he didn't have to care what people in Washington thought."

Ignatius warns that Cheney's way of thinking, if it is sustained, could result in a confrontation between the White House and Congress on Iraq and other issues.


...


Cheney's Enigmatic Influence

Wall Street Journal | January 19, 2007
David Ignatius

After six years, it remains one of Washington's enduring mysteries: How does Vice President Cheney shape decisions in the tight inner circle of the Bush administration? There's a sense that Cheney's influence is on the rise again, at least with Iraq policy, but that's after many months in which his allies say his role was diminished.

To outside observers, Cheney has been the political equivalent of a black hole -- exerting a powerful but mostly invisible force on decisions. The office of the vice president has had a gravitational weight that sucked in other personalities and entire branches of the government without emitting light or heat that would explain the decision-making process.


During Bush's first term, the "OVP," as it's known in Washington, functioned as a kind of parallel national security staff. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was a strong chief of staff, and he hired talented foreign policy experts -- Eric Edelman and then Victoria Nuland -- to act, in effect, as Cheney's national security advisers. During Bush's second term, that role was taken on by John Hannah, a former policy researcher at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. But insiders say that since Libby's departure in 2005, the OVP has had less of an impact on foreign policy.

"What has defined the OVP since Scooter left is listlessness," says one Cheney ally. "For 18 months, it was defined by its torpidity. That was deeply distressing" to Cheney's conservative supporters, who feared that Bush had become captive to overly cautious advice from his senior military commanders, Gen. John Abizaid and Gen. George Casey.

This month's change in Iraq policy, in which Bush turned away from the patient strategy his military commanders had advocated, may have marked a return of Cheney's influence. But insiders caution that it's a mistake to see Cheney as some kind of puppet master on Iraq policy and that the key decisions have been made by Bush himself.

The thrust of Cheney's views -- in urging the president to ignore politics and maintain a tough course on Iraq -- surfaced in an interview he gave last weekend to Chris Wallace of Fox News. Wallace noted that Iraq was a big issue in the November elections and that exit polls showed only 17 percent of voters supported sending in more troops. What followed was this remarkable exchange:

Wallace: "By taking the policy you have, haven't you, Mr. Vice President, ignored the express will of the American people in the November election?"

The vice president: "Well, Chris, this president, and I don't think any president worth his salt, can afford to make decisions of this magnitude according to the polls. The polls change day by day."

Wallace: "This was an election, sir."

The vice president: "Polls change day by day, week by week."

Those remarks capture what Cheney's friends say is his crucial contribution to internal decisions -- a conviction that much of the political debate in Washington is just noise and should be ignored in favor of the country's long-term interests.

"Over the years, he got tired of suffering fools," says one longtime Cheney friend. "He thinks it's all BS." This contempt for Washington developed when Cheney was a top White House aide in the Ford administration during the cacophony that followed Watergate, this friend says, and it ripened when he made enough money as chief executive of Halliburton that he didn't have to care what people in Washington thought. The danger is that in encouraging Bush to ignore polls and even elections, Cheney has helped set up a confrontation between Congress and the executive branch that could undermine any hope of achieving a bipartisan approach on Iraq.

While Cheney seems to have prevailed on Iraq, he appeared to suffer a defeat in this week's White House decision to submit the warrantless surveillance program to the oversight of the FISA court. Many administration lawyers urged that course over the past several years, but it was strongly resisted by Cheney's current chief of staff, David Addington, who argued that the president had inherent authority to authorize the program under his war-making powers. "Addington clearly lost this round," says one official who met with him about the National Security Agency program.

The mystery of how Cheney operates may finally be clarified in the coming trial of Libby. The vice president will be called to testify on behalf of his former chief of staff, whom he described to Wallace last week as "one of the finest individuals I've ever known." That was pure Cheney -- the stand-up guy from Wyoming.

Cheney's testimony, in person or by affidavit, about the use of classified information will go to the heart of the Cheney puzzle: How does the most important but elusive presidential adviser in modern history use his power behind the scenes?


"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent."

- Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK

Get TerrorStorm on DVD today!



SOURCE FOR SOURCES - http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/cheney_says_washington_bs_full_of_suffering_fools.htm



BBC's Greg Palast on Stealing Elections... Forever?

::: 30 mins :::





SOURCE FOR PALASTING IMPRESSIONS - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=482230517116551910&q=greg+palast








CSPAN: Webster G. Tarpley at the American Scholars Symposium

::: 8 mins :::





SOURCE FOR TARPOLOGY 101: LET'S GET IT - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxf4EU0xI3s



Peace by pointing out the players...
BK

_______________________

...

Google: Black Krishna

...

P.S. Stewart and Colbert show us they're lying and trying to dumb us down, to find out why and help Save The World, please Google for "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism", "America: Freedom to Fascism" and "SaveTheInternet.com". Also, check the daily newswires at "Infowars.com" and "PrisonPlanet.com" -- and pass this info on to everybody -- NOW!








0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home