Monday, August 28, 2006

THE DAILY SHOW WITH JON STEWART: Living In A Police State (It's 4:20 people, smoke'em while you still got a place with no cameras... :-)

Man, these guys are awesome.

I mean, they really manage to make the journey to hell a merry adventure, and for that they should be most certainly applauded.

I mean, everybody's doing their part to make everyone else's part easier, and for that they should be most certainly applauded.

Oprah has 30 million housewives giving money to Africa. Now, she'll tell us "how" Africa is screwed up, but not "why", and that's her thing.

Michel Moore will tell us about corporate and government lies and corruption, but again - he'll tell us "how" they're corrupt, but not "why", and that's his thing.

I was watching a filmed talk by William Pepper, a well-respected journalist who'd previously been on NBC and CNN having covered the Vietnam War, and who's currently a high-profile international lawyer. He wrote a book based on several years of first-hand research called "An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King", which conclusively argues that the U.S. government ordered the assasination of Dr. King using the local mafia, and that they had a military hit team standing by as back-up.

This also encompassed two jury trials with real judges - one was even broadcast in pieces on Court TV, that acquitted James Earl Ray of the shooting. This by definition implicates the government in a cover-up, and the testimony of dozens of witness who came forward years later at considerable risk to their lives was a staggering indictment of the criminal elements of the government who wield tremendous power even today.

His good friend was a New York Times book reviewer, and he said in the 25 years he'd been working there he'd never been ordered not to review a book - until this one. The rest of the mass media shy's away as well despite the fact they all know him and are consistently friendly, and even his good friend the former U.S. Attorney General and international human rights crusader Ramsay Clark refuses to look at Pepper's evidence. It only got publised because the same company wanted to publish Dr. King's papers and recordings, and Ms. Coretta Scott King insisted that they could have them only if Mr. Pepper's book be published as well. So, he's having some trouble getting the truth out, and as he said in response to a question about whether or not he'd contacted Michael Moore:

(paraphrased) "Michael Moore does good work, and he's made some very important films, but this... this is a different animal. When you're talking about government cover-ups and military industrial complex involvement, it's not quite the same thing."

I agree, but it's very, very, very important that we understand it with the endgame being played right now, for if they change the "laws" that we need to protect us then their various security arms will merely enforce them irrespective of our cries of injustice.

SEE - The Rest Of The World.

And for Mr. Pepper's book - which has good reviews from Publisher's Weekly and Booklist on, please go to:

An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King (Hardcover)


Alex Jones has made over a dozen films on the growing police state, all exhaustively documented with insane footage of actual police doing terrible things to actual American citizens on a regular basis, and at 10 years deep in the game without being proven "wrong", he's probably right in pointing out something we should watch out for.

It's hard to believe though, I completely understand.

The PSYOP the military industrial complex is running on us (with big banking and big oil as the key players) is absolutely disgusting, and they're getting us to babble all sorts of garbage that isn't in any way addressing or slowing down the slide into endless wars and domestic tyranny.

Here's an example of their work admitting they were magnifying the stated threat of the "Zarqawi" boogeyman:

Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi

Jordanian Painted As Foreign Threat To Iraq's Stability

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 10, 2006; Page A01

For the past two years, U.S. military leaders have been using Iraqi media and other outlets in Baghdad to publicize Zarqawi's role in the insurgency. The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.


I even had a friend watch "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State" the other day, and he came back upset and disbelieving. I asked him what's wrong, and he said he didn't like the way Alex Jones attacked Michael Moore. I told him I agreed, but that didn't mean he was "wrong" in his analysis. I asked him what else he found wrong with the movie, and he said he didn't have a "pen and paper" to take everything he found "wrong" down. I asked him for at least one "smoking gun" to prove that he actually found something "wrong" as opposed to parroting PSYOP newspeak that bashes anyone not following the corporate media and government to the letter as a "conspiracy theorist". He said he didn't know. I asked him how could he be sure anything was "wrong" if nothing stuck out? How come he didn't have a "lie" to throw in my face and disprove my interest in this stuff at all?

He didn't know.

Apparently he didn't believe something that he couldn't disprove, and that's where we are today.

Anyway, if you want you can see it for yourself, it's awesome, and my "10 Reasons To Watch It" review from last summer is also copied on this page:

Martial Law 9/11 Now Available For Free Download


And now the main event, Messrs. Stewart and Colbert break down world of "A Scanner Darkly" in a far more amusing way than Richard Linklater's nonetheless brilliant (and occasionally hilarious) film.

Enjoy... :-)

The Daily Show: Living In A Police State


Peace by playing with the pieces...



Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy -

Music -


FYI - Saving The World will never be easier than this, so let's get cracking:

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert show us the media is lying and trying to make us dumber ALL the time, so check the and newswires for why. The send copies of "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism" on DVD or Google Video to everyone - NOW!!!

P.S. See the history of money and how it's used right now to herd us into a police state - "America: From Freedom to Fascism" - and pass it on - NOW!!!

P.P.S. Check this out too while you still can!

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies from deciding which Web sites you can see based on what site pays them the most -- which means most of us won't be able to afford a website – and pass it on – NOW!!!

BONUS: Even the better papers take dives...

PLEASE NOTE - The original article contains links to corroborating articles that explain some of the statements used below. That's why they assume knowledge, if you're reading the original sentence you can just click on it to check the references - Thx!



Washington Post Doesn't Answer Why No Bin Laden 9/11 Indictment

Whitewash piece seeks to dismiss questions about FBI most wanted page but doesn't address why embassy indictment took 3 months yet no 9/11 charge after 5 years

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | August 28 2006

Bin LadenA Washington Post article today attempts to refute and dismiss questions as to why the FBI's most wanted page for Osama bin Laden includes no apportion of blame for 9/11 - yet the Post fails to answer why there has been no formal indictment of bin Laden five years after 9/11 when it only took three months to charge him with the 1998 embassy bombings.

A key cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement's challenge that verifiable evidence proving the government's version of events be presented in court is the fact that bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website contains no reference to 9/11, only charging bin Laden with involvement in the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya.

In late September 2001, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI Rex Tomb told Wired News, "There's going to be a considerable amount of time before anyone associated with the attacks is actually charged."

"To be charged with a crime, this means we have found evidence to confirm our suspicions, and a prosecutor has said we will pursue this case in court."

In June 2006 investigative reporter Ed Hass contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website.

“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.

“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.

“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.

Five years later and bin Laden has not been charged as having any association with the 9/11 attacks. By the FBI's own guidelines, they have found or been provided with no evidence to connect bin Laden to the events of that day. This includes the alleged "confession tape" which was miraculously 'discovered' in a house in Jalalabad by US troops and features a bin Laden doppelganger with a rotund frame and absent the real bin Laden's slender nose. According to the FBI bin Laden is left-handed, yet the tape shows him writing a note with his right hand. In Bin Laden's first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied any involvement. This isn't like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop - terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise why bother killing people to send a political message?

The fact that the FBI does not consider the 'confession tape' as reliable evidence of involvement in 9/11 is completely dismissed by the Washington Post who say the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, "proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings."


"TerrorStorm sets a new standard in documentary filmmaking. Alex Jones knocks it out of the park yet again." -Dylan Avery, Director, "Loose Change" - Click here to get the DVD or click here to watch online now!


In July 2006, the New York Times reported that a CIA counterterror unit named Alec Station, a 10-year old subdivision tasked with finding bin Laden, had been closed down. In addition, former CIA director Buzzy Krongard told the London Times that bin Laden should stay free and it was better off for the world for him to remain at large.

On two separate occasions President Bush has publicly stated that he is no longer interested in catching bin Laden.

The Washington Post article is clearly an attempt to whitewash and dismiss further investigation into why there has been no formal indictment implicating bin Laden in the 9/11 attacks. At no point in the piece does the Post's senior journalist Dan Eggen address the question of why there has been no formal indictment - only stating that "Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001."

The embassy bombings occurred on August 7th 1998 and bin Laden was indicted for them on November 4th of the same year - less than three months after the attack. Yet we are approaching five years since 9/11 and no indictment has taken place nor has any formal court hearing been scheduled or even considered.

The Washington Post whitewash fails to answer the question of why there has been no formal indictment.

The reason that there has been no indictment in the five years since the attack and why there will never be one is because the evidence connecting nineteen incompetent pilots acting at the behest of an ailing Sheik hobbling between a cave and a kidney dialysis machine with the most infamous terror attack in history is non-existent. Any further high-profile inquiry into what happened on 9/11, even if it is a cover-up job appointed by Bush like the 9/11 Commission, will only turn up more bizarre inconsistencies which render the official story impossible.

The criminals wish for no further scrutiny of their act of mass murder and the current counter-attack against the 9/11 truth movement being run through their propaganda organs like Popular Mechanics and the Washington Post is part of that resistance.