Monday, March 21, 2005

Jon Stewart Stewing...

how disorienting it is to absorb info that
way
, and i think she got it and why she's messed up by some freaky
shit that just pops up and disappears and assaults us in confusing
waves...


jon stewart's fave was "when you saw the charred bodies of Uday and
Qusay Hussein
, and below the ticker read-- i swear to God, "Beyonce
says she doesn't like the word "Bootylicious!"


he's got a point man, and his interviewed evisceration of the media
was brilliant on CSPAN:

http://www.c-span.org/
Search: Jon Stewart


i may catch it actually, it's been a minit...

(...)

SOURCE - http://www.c-span.org/search/basic.asp?ResultStart=1&ResultCount=10&BasicQueryText=jon+stewart

Jon Stewart on the Presidential Election, the Media, and Politics
In New York City, NY, Host and Executive Producer of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show," Jon Stewart, talks about presidential politics and the media.
10/25/2004: NEW YORK CITY, NY: 1 hr.

(...)

Epiblogue:

(And with $2 billion/day spent and nothing really positive happening - aren't the troops are expected to stay until 2006? So... you think the New York Times should really say only...)

24 Insurgents Die in Attack Near Baghdad

By EDWARD WONG
Published: March 21, 2005
NYTimes.com > International > Middle East

AGHDAD, Iraq, March 20 - Iraqi insurgents ambushed an American military convoy in daylight outside Baghdad on Sunday, igniting a battle that left 24 of the attackers dead and 7 wounded, American military officials said. The unusually bold assault appeared to be the largest by insurgents against an American target since the Jan. 30 elections.

SOURCE - http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/21/international/middleeast/21iraq.html

(...)

(I mean, c'mon... with 150,000 troops vs. 3mm (?) "insurgents" plus carpet-bombing 24-hours a day, you tellin' me THAT's all that's going on over there?)

(Why?)

(...)

(...because...)

(...then it gets confusing when you do great stuff too...)

(...i mean...)

(...really...)

(...it's becoming quite stressful...)

(...i mean...)

(...)

X-celling Over Men

By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: March 20, 2005
NYTimes.com > Opinion

Men are always telling me not to generalize about them.

But a startling new study shows that science is backing me up here.

Research published last week in the journal Nature reveals that women are genetically more complex than scientists ever imagined, while men remain the simple creatures they appear.

"Alas," said one of the authors of the study, the Duke University genome expert Huntington Willard, "genetically speaking, if you've met one man, you've met them all. We are, I hate to say it, predictable. You can't say that about women. Men and women are farther apart than we ever knew. It's not Mars or Venus. It's Mars or Venus, Pluto, Jupiter and who knows what other planets."

Women are not only more different from men than we knew. Women are more different from each other than we knew - creatures of "infinite variety," as Shakespeare wrote.

"We poor men only have 45 chromosomes to do our work with because our 46th is the pathetic Y that has only a few genes which operate below the waist and above the knees," Dr. Willard observed. "In contrast, we now know that women have the full 46 chromosomes that they're getting work from and the 46th is a second X that is working at levels greater than we knew."

SOURCE - http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/opinion/20dowd.html?8hpib

(...)

Bush's Re-election Lifts Circulation at Liberal Magazines

By SARA IVRY
Published: March 21, 2005

Sheepish though they may be about profiting from George Bush's re-election, some liberal magazines have seen subscriptions rise during the recent political season.

"We had a huge spike in orders beginning the day after the election," said Art Stupar, vice president for circulation at The Nation, which comes out weekly. "In fact, our Web site, in the week following the election, generated 2,600 subscriptions." Typically, The Nation gets no more than 500 subscriptions a week through its Web site, he said.

Overall subscriptions to The Nation reached 184,000 at the end of December, up 24,000 from the previous year; they have doubled since 2000, with a spurt in 2003, when the war in Iraq got under way. "You could say that all the way through, for four years, we've benefited from the follies of the Bush administration," Mr. Stupar said.

SOURCE - http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/21/business/media/21mag.html

(...)

Counting of 2004 Provisional Ballots Varied Widely, Study Finds

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 20, 2005

ASHINGTON, March 19 (AP) - Two-thirds of the more than 1.6 million provisional ballots cast in last year's presidential election were counted, but there were wide differences from state to state. Alaska counted 97 percent of its provisional votes, Delaware just 6 percent.

SOURCE - http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/politics/20ballot.html?pagewanted=all

(...)

Bush Defends Offering Video News Releases

By RICHARD W. STEVENSON
Published: March 17, 2005

WASHINGTON, March 16 - President Bush on Wednesday defended his administration's practice of providing television stations with video news releases that resemble actual news reports, saying that the practice was legal and that it was up to broadcasters to make clear that any of the releases they used on the air were produced by the government.

"This has been a longstanding practice of the federal government to use these types of videos," Mr. Bush said. "The Agricultural Department, as I understand it, has been using these videos for a long period of time. The Defense Department, other departments have been doing so. It's important that they be based on the guidelines set out by the Justice Department."

Mr. Bush said it would be "helpful if local stations then disclosed to their viewers" that any portions of the releases they used were produced by the government, but he added that, "evidently, in some cases, that's not the case."

The New York Times reported on Sunday that at least 20 government agencies have made and distributed hundreds of video news releases in the last four years. Many of them were broadcast on local news programs without any public acknowledgement of the government's role in their production.

SOURCE - http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/17/politics/17video.html

(...)

"Cause I see, y'all be Chokin' on Chomsky!"

(...)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home